CircleCI Reviews & Product Details - Page 2

Intuitive and easy to navigate, and after working with it, I got used to it.

At our place, we use it for builds on every commit push and deploy jobs to different envs.

It's fairly simple, has slack and github integration, setup is easy (way easier than Jenkins at least) Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes there's a timeout or page doesn't refresh telling you the status of a build.

Apart from that, not many issues. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Since we moved to circle CI we have saved many hours of work. It even allows to do this concurantly which allows our deployes to be event faster.

We have checked out many other platform, but just love the service and pricing Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We really lack the ability to cancel a job when we start a new one, altough this is possible on a project settings it is not possible on a per branch or workflow. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Its seamless integration with popular version control systems like GitHub and Bitbucket. This allows developers to quickly set up and configure continuous integration and delivery pipelines for their projects.CircleCI also provides excellent scalability and performance, allowing for efficient parallel execution of tests and builds. Overall, CircleCI offers a reliable and robust CI/CD solution that dramatically simplifies the process of automating software builds, tests, and deployments. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

CircleCI primarily focuses on cloud-based CI/CD workflows, which may not align well with specific local development or on-premises deployment scenarios. This can be a limitation for organizations with specific requirements. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We use CircleCI as a pre-check on commits, before doing the actual code review, integrated to phabricator. As our codebase grows, running lint checkers and tests locally before opening a code review takes a long time, so we usually do not do it locally and leave it to the CI, trading our time in running automatic checks for focusing on other tasks. It also help us locate adjusts to our commits before the actual code review, the CI will indicate and error on the commit and not send it to the next step, peer review. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I am not in charge of configuration and maintenance of the CI on my company, but sometimes we have problems where the automation stops working, sometimes it would run the tests we delegated to it but not make a post-test change on the commit status (would not change it to ready to review) Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The web interface is simple and clear, yet extraordinarily powerful. I find I can do pretty much whatever I want in just a few clicks. Where there are issues with my pipelines, they are easy to identify, and therefore resolve. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes the documentation is a little bit sparse / downright unclear. CircleCI is by no means the only offender here, and they hacve excellent support to fill in any gaps. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's a promising CI/CD pipeline for early detection of build errors in code.

Also, it gives failed or error notifications and can be easily configurable and is very user interactive Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Even a small syntax error causes the pipeline to fail.

It will be good to have a tool to verify whether the code for circle ci is syntactically correct.

Also if CircleCI could make the deployment code run faster Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is really simple to use, integrate with other technologies, and has great documentation to follow.

Someone coming from the DevOps/Sysadmin role, with a little knowledge can easily connect the dots on what CircleCI offers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The docker layer cache and IP ranges seem to be a bit too expensive for usage. I'm not saying it doesn't work actually, it does, but the price is kinda expensive Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Straightforward and relatively simple to configure. Very powerful extensibility. A+ documentation and community support. Great UI and command line tools. Very pleased with almost all facets of CirclCI. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Billing and monthly usage are a little convoluted. Can be hard (or maybe impossible) to fully test your configuration locally. There have been a few downtime incidents in the 2 years since we've been clients. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like the ease of use of the platform. I also like able to get ssh shell into the docker image to help troubleshoot pipelines. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes the documentation can be all over, lacking concrete examples that are up to date with its platform changes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The Insights help pinpoint and monitor slow and flaky tests, and keep build times under control. The configuration options are straightforward and well documented, giving lots of control with a quick ramp. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The charts in Insights can be confusing. Some examples are showing the last 100 builds instead of time-series makes it hard to identify when a config change occurred and what impacts it had on build times / failures. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.