_Shevek_ wrote:
Thanks a lot to both of you. I uninstalled WithSecure and removed the leftover stuff of Sophos (it's so difficult to completely uninstall that guy from Mac, I did a clean Uninstall at the time but it failed). Performances immediately improved and another run of EtreCheckPro confirmed that (attached).
Until all its system-altering components are identified and completely eradicated the Mac's performance will remain less than optimal. Most people are astounded at how well their Macs work after they get rid of the junk.
However, those astounded users are the ones who actually come to this site seeking assistance, a minority that eliminates the overwhelming number of Mac users who don't. That majority of Mac users might contact Apple Support for help instead, but Apple will never tell someone to uninstall something they installed. They leave that decision to the user for sound reasons. It's their Mac and what they choose to install on it is their business.
It's a lose-lose situation for Apple because to fix a user's problems Apple have to convince the user whatever they bought / installed was junk, which always meets with resistance.
Worse, as a highly visible lucrative target, if they were to do that Apple would face the wrath of junk product developers who make a living selling garbage products that should never be installed to begin with. Apple's legal counsel would ensure they'd never, ever go down that road. It's a nonstarter. Instead, the hapless user becomes easily convinced their Macs are just too old and it's time to replace them. And the cycle continues. Win-win for Apple.
Macs work just fine, if you let them. It's also the reason I often state "rule 1 of Macs is don't install junk" because it never ends well.
Think before you click. Installing is easy. Recovery, if attempted long after the fact, becomes difficult and (short of completely erasing the Mac) can be impossible.
etresoft wrote:
OK. That makes sense. It isn't unusual for uninstallers to fail to work properly. Some developers just ignore uninstallation altogether.
When I installed the product in question a while ago, I determined its uninstaller was almost completely ineffective. Numerous components required manual deletion. Some (like the contents of its Application Support folder) just occupied needless space, while others continually attempted to launch apps or processes that no longer existed. Obviously, that Mac continued to operate poorly.
This is a typical characteristic of "junk" software. However, the converse is not always true. One notoriously bad product that continues to be marketed and sold has an uninstallation procedure that is completely effective. That does not mean it's "beneficial" software. It's still junk.