A public good: every Supreme Court Oral Argument since 2010. Making the Highest Court more accessible for a modern audience. The DC Bar blog's piece about this podcast can be found here: https://www.tinyurl.com/scotuspod. If you'd like to support the law student who created this project instead of studying you can do so here: https://www.tinyurl.com/scotusguy. Thanks for listening! Patreon
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
The latest news and analysis about key cases and critical arguments before the Supreme Court. (Updated periodically) PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy
…
continue reading
Unedited English audio of oral arguments at the Supreme Court of Canada. Created as a public service to promote public access and awareness of the workings of Canada’s highest court. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the Court. Original archived webcasts can be found on the Court’s website at scc-csc.ca. Feedback welcome: podcast at scchearings dot ca.
…
continue reading
Audio from oral arguments in the Supreme Court of the United States (beg. Oct. 2010)
…
continue reading
In depth explanations of Supreme Court Cases New Jersey v T.L.O, Mapp v Ohio, and Miranda v Arizona.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Supreme Court Season episodes will include all arguments that occur from October 01st to April/May. You can listen to the sidebar version of each Supreme Court Case https://thesidebar.transistor.fm/
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
A podcast feed for the audio of Supreme Court oral arguments and decision announcements. Short case descriptions are reproduced from Oyez.org under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license. This feed is not approved, managed, or affiliated with Oyez.org. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
…
continue reading
We will dive into the astounding stories of the Supreme Court.
…
continue reading
Following what the Supreme Court is actually doing can be daunting. Reporting on the subject is often only done within the context of political narratives of the day -- and following the Court's decisions and reading every new case can be a non-starter. The purpose of this Podcast is to make it as easy as possible for members of the public to source information about what is happening at the Supreme Court. For that reason, we read every Opinion Syllabus without any commentary whatsoever. Fur ...
…
continue reading
Opinion announcements from the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Podcast by Hemant Mehta
…
continue reading
The Queens Supreme Court podcast is the hilarious spinoff of the hit online series “The Queens Supreme Court” with Ts Madison. The premise of the weekly satirical show is to discuss pop culture and all the hot social media trends, topics and gossip THEN try them as cases, render judgements and sentence the crimes accordingly to determine the ultimate fate of each celebrity!
…
continue reading
In under 30 minutes. Do you want to understand specific cases? We are here to provide commentary on every Supreme Court case.
…
continue reading
Looking for entertaining basketball content without the drama? Check out The Supreme Court: A Basketball Podcast! Join Robaire, Chris, and Henri every Wednesday for the latest NBA headlines, news, and transactions.
…
continue reading
Brett and Nazim are two attorneys who hate being attorneys. Each week, they discuss current Supreme Court cases with the intent to make the law more accessible to the average person, while ruminating on what makes the law both frustrating and interesting. This podcast is not legal advice and is for entertainment purposes only. If anything you hear leads you to believe you need legal advice, please contact an attorney immediately
…
continue reading
Throughout the years the Supreme Court has evolved much like the rest of the federal government. This would not be without landmark rulings, which will be the main focus of this podcast. Landmark rulings lay the groundwork for laws to be overturned or upheld and allow for the United States to work toward major goals. Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/aaron-larson2/support
…
continue reading
This study, A Christian Response to the Supreme Court Decision, exposes the foreboding Danger that this ruling will bring upon our nation if things don’t turn around very quickly. You will also be thoroughly equipped to give a loving Biblical apologetic response to 15 different accusations made against Christians regarding this issue.
…
continue reading
1
Richard Leonard Walker v. His Majesty the King (41703)
35:50
35:50
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
35:50During the course of an investigation under the Traffic Safety Act, a police officer attempted to effect a warrantless arrest of the applicant for obstruction under s. 129(a) of the Criminal Code. In a pre-trial application, the trial judge found that the police officer was not executing a lawful arrest, and therefore breached the applicant’s s. 9 …
…
continue reading
1
What the justices signaled in a Supreme Court case that could reshape electoral maps
7:22
7:22
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
7:22The Supreme Court’s conservative majority signaled it could upend a central pillar of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. The question at the heart of arguments is whether lawmakers can use race as a factor when drawing congressional districts. Ali Rogin discussed the case's potential to reshape electoral maps with News Hour Supreme Court analyst and SCOTU…
…
continue reading
Case v. Montana | 10/15/25 | Docket #: 24-62424-624 CASE V. MONTANADECISION BELOW: 553 P.3d 985CERT. GRANTED 6/2/2025QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether law enforcement may enter a home without a search warrant based on less than probable cause that an emergency is occurring, or whether the emergency-aid exception requires probable cause.LOWER COURT CASE NU…
…
continue reading
1
Ellingburg v. United States
1:04:17
1:04:17
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
1:04:17A case in which the Court will decide whether criminal restitution under the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act (MVRA) is penal for purposes of the Ex Post Facto Clause.
…
continue reading
1
His Majesty the King v. Thi Huyen Nguyen, et al. (41400)
2:20:22
2:20:22
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
2:20:22A police investigation into the production of marijuana led to criminal proceedings against 11 individuals. A stay of proceedings was entered for the respondents in light of unreasonable delays. The Court of Québec dismissed the motion to dismiss the motion for forfeiture pursuant to ss. 491.1 and 462.37(2) of the Cr. C. and s. 16(2) of the CDSA. T…
…
continue reading
1
Glen L. Resler, in his capacity as Chief Electoral Officer v. Joseph V. Anglin (41298)
2:37:33
2:37:33
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
2:37:33Mr. Anglin was a member of the Legislative Assembly of Alberta from 2012 until 2015, when he was unsuccessful in his re-election bid. He accepts the result of the election, but alleges that the Chief Electoral Officer interfered with the fairness of the election and, by doing so, injured his chances of being elected. He seeks damages for the allege…
…
continue reading
1
Patrick Street Holdings Limited v. 11368 NL Inc. (41296)
2:07:20
2:07:20
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
2:07:2011368 NL Inc. was the owner of commercial real estate known as Kenmount Terrace. Patrick Street Holdings Limited is part of a group of related companies that, through loans secured by mortgages, financed development projects undertaken by a group of related companies including 11368 NL Inc. In early 2016, two mortgages known as Mortgage 608132 and …
…
continue reading
1
Former Justice Anthony Kennedy on political division and the state of the Supreme Court
10:27
10:27
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
10:27Former Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy served on the nation’s highest court for three decades. He was often described as the swing vote in landmark decisions from marriage equality to campaign finance. It’s a label he’s long resisted, even years after his 2018 retirement. He explained why when he sat down with Geoff Bennett to discuss his new…
…
continue reading
Ellingburg v. United States | 10/14/25 | Docket #: 24-48224-482 ELLINGBURG V. UNITED STATESDECISION BELOW: 113 F.4th 839JOHN F. BASH, ESQUIRE, OF AUSTIN, TEXAS, IS INVITED TO BRIEF AND ARGUE THIS CASE, AS AMICUS CURIAE, IN SUPPORT OF THE JUDGMENT BELOW.CERT. GRANTED 4/7/2025QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether criminal restitution under the Mandatory Victim …
…
continue reading
Bowe v. United States | 10/14/25 | Docket #: 24-543824-5438 BOWE V. UNITED STATESDECISION BELOW: CA 11 ORDER 6/27/2024KASDIN M. MITCHELL, ESQUIRE, OF DALLAS, TEXAS, IS INVITED TO BRIEF AND ARGUE THIS CASE, AS AMICUS CURIAE, IN SUPPORT OF THE JUDGMENT BELOW AS TO QUESTION 1 PRESENTED BY THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI.CERT. GRANTED 1/17/2025QU…
…
continue reading
1
Chief of the Edmonton Police Service v. John McKee, et al. (Day 2/2) (41110)
1:05:36
1:05:36
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
1:05:36In 2015, a finding of misconduct was made against an Edmonton Police Service (EPS) detective, and was recorded in a document entitled “Decision of Hearing”. The EPS provided the respondent, His Majesty the King in Right of Canada (hereafter, the “Crown”), with a copy of the Decision of Hearing in July 2015 in relation to a prosecution. The finding …
…
continue reading
1
Chief of the Edmonton Police Service v. John McKee, et al. (Day 1/2) (41110)
2:07:19
2:07:19
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
2:07:19In 2015, a finding of misconduct was made against an Edmonton Police Service (EPS) detective, and was recorded in a document entitled “Decision of Hearing”. The EPS provided the respondent, His Majesty the King in Right of Canada (hereafter, the “Crown”), with a copy of the Decision of Hearing in July 2015 in relation to a prosecution. The finding …
…
continue reading
USPS v. Konan | 10/08/25 | Docket #: 24-35124-351 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE V. KONANDECISION BELOW: 96 F.4th 799CERT. GRANTED 4/21/2025QUESTION PRESENTED:The Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), ch. 753, 60 Stat. 842 (28 U.S.C. 1346(b), 2671 et seq.), generally waives the United States' sovereign immunity for suits seeking damages "for injury or loss…
…
continue reading
Bost v. IL Bd. of Elections | 10/08/25 | Docket #: 24-56824-568 BOST V. ILLINOIS BOARD OF ELECTIONSDECISION BELOW: 114 F.4th 634CERT. GRANTED 6/2/2025QUESTION PRESENTED:Federal law sets the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November as the federal Election Day. 2 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 7; and 3 U.S.C. § 1. Several states, including Illinois, have en…
…
continue reading
1
Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections
1:43:43
1:43:43
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
1:43:43A case in which the Court will decide whether federal candidates have Article III standing to challenge state election laws that extend the deadline for receiving and counting mail-in ballots beyond Election Day when they allege vote dilution and increased campaign costs from monitoring extended ballot counting.…
…
continue reading
1
United States Postal Service v. Konan
1:06:54
1:06:54
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
1:06:54A case in which the Court will decide whether a claim that Postal Service employees intentionally refused to deliver mail to a designated address arises out of “the loss” or “miscarriage” of postal matter under the Federal Tort Claims Act’s postal-matter exception.
…
continue reading
1
What Supreme Court justices signaled in arguments over Colorado’s conversion therapy ban
5:26
5:26
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
5:26על ידי PBS News
…
continue reading
…
continue reading
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment permits two sentences for an act that violates 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) and (j).
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will decide whether a Colorado law banning “conversion therapy”—i.e., attempts to “convert” someone’s sexual orientation or gender identity—violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment.
…
continue reading
1
A look at Colorado’s conversion therapy ban as it faces a Supreme Court challenge
9:20
9:20
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
9:20על ידי PBS News
…
continue reading
…
continue reading
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will decide whether a Delaware law providing that a complaint must be dismissed unless it is accompanied by an expert affidavit must be applied in federal court.
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will decide whether a trial court violates a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel by banning discussion of the defendant’s ongoing testimony with counsel during an overnight recess.
…
continue reading
1
A look at the major cases the Supreme Court will take up in its new term
8:17
8:17
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
8:17The Supreme Court begins a new term on Monday following a summer-long recess shaped by legal battles over the Trump administration’s agenda. William Brangham discussed the high-profile cases with News Hour Supreme Court analyst and SCOTUSBlog cofounder Amy Howe, and Stephen Vladeck, constitutional law professor at Georgetown University. PBS News is…
…
continue reading
1
Legal scholar analyzes key court rulings on Trump’s immigration agenda
5:43
5:43
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
5:43For a legal perspective on new developments regarding President Trump’s immigration agenda, Geoff Bennett spoke with William Banks, professor emeritus of law at Syracuse University. PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacyעל ידי PBS News
…
continue reading
1
Trump policies stalled by series of rulings, likely setting up Supreme Court fight
5:20
5:20
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
5:20A federal court rejected the Trump administration's use of an 18th-century wartime law, known as the Alien Enemies Act, to deport Venezuelans accused of being gang members. It's another legal setback for the White House, which has also seen courts curtail its authority to impose tariffs and send troops into U.S. cities. William Brangham discussed m…
…
continue reading
1
Kagan criticizes fellow justices over lack of explanation in recent Supreme Court rulings
6:47
6:47
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
6:47The Supreme Court has handled a flood of appeals from the Trump administration on its emergency docket, also known as the shadow docket. In the first six months of Trump’s term, the conservatives on the court have sided with him on several key policies, but the decisions have come with little to no explanation for their rationale. Geoff Bennett dis…
…
continue reading
1
Goldey v. Field (Bivens / Excessive Force)
5:31
5:31
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
5:31Send us a text Goldey v. Fields PER CURIAM. In Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U. S. 388 (1971), this Court recognized an implied cause of action for damages against federal officers for certain alleged violations of the Fourth Amendment. The Court subsequently recognized two additional contexts where implied Bivens causes of actio…
…
continue reading
1
Trump v. CASA, Inc. (Universal Injunction / Birthright Citizenship)
14:21
14:21
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
14:21Send us a text Trump v. CASA, Inc. Held: Universal injunctions likely exceed the equitable authority that Congress has given to federal courts. The Court grants the Government’s applications for a partial stay of the injunctions entered below, but only to the extent that the injunctions are broader than necessary to provide complete relief to each …
…
continue reading
1
Kennedy v. Braidwood Management, Inc. (Appointments Clause)
13:58
13:58
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
13:58Send us a text Kennedy v. Braidwood Management, Inc. In 1984, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) created the U. S. Preventive Services Task Force, a body that formulates evidence-based recommendations regarding preventive healthcare services. Congress codified the Task Force’s role in 1999, establishing it as an entity within the Age…
…
continue reading
1
FCC v. Consumer Research (Nondelegation Doctrine)
15:53
15:53
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
15:53Send us a text FCC v. Consumers’ Research The Communications Act of 1934 established the FCC and instructed it to make available to “all the people of the United States,” reliable communications services “at reasonable charges.” 47 U. S. C. §151. That objective is today known as “universal service.” The universal-service project arose from the conc…
…
continue reading
1
Mahmoud v. Taylor (LGBTQ+ Books / Parental Opt-Out)
14:35
14:35
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
14:35Send us a text Held: Parents challenging the Board’s introduction of the “LGBTQ+-inclusive” storybooks, along with its decision to withhold opt outs, are entitled to a preliminary injunction. Read by Jeff Barnum.על ידי Jake Leahy
…
continue reading
1
Birthright Citizenship and Skrmetti
54:09
54:09
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
54:09The Supreme Court's term is over so it's time to panic. This week's episode covers Trump v. CASA, which doesn't really talk about birthright citizenship, but maybe does something even worse. This episode also covers Skrmetti v. US, which is maybe not as bad as it could have been. It's a mixed bag, folks. Law starts at (07:14).…
…
continue reading
1
Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton (Texas Pornography Regulation)
9:35
9:35
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
9:35Send us a text Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton Texas, like many States, prohibits distributing sexually explicit content to children. In 2023, Texas enacted H. B. 1181, requiring certain commercial websites publishing sexually explicit content that is obscene to minors to verify that visitors are 18 or older. Knowing violations subject covere…
…
continue reading
Send us a text Hewitt v. United States Before the First Step Act was enacted in 2018, federal judges were required to sentence first-time offenders convicted of violating 18 U. S. C. §924(c)—a law that criminalizes possessing a firearm while committing other crimes—to “stacked” 25-year periods of incarceration. The First Step Act eliminated this ha…
…
continue reading
1
Medina v. Planned Parenthood (Medicaid Funding)
11:23
11:23
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
11:23Send us a text Median v. Planned Parenthood Held: Section 1396a(a)(23)(A) does not clearly and unambiguously confer individual rights enforceable under §1983.על ידי Jake Leahy
…
continue reading
1
How the Supreme Court ruling on nationwide injunctions affects presidential powers
10:12
10:12
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
10:12The Supreme Court delivered a major decision Friday that limits federal judges’ power to block the president’s agenda nationwide. Stemming from a case over Trump’s order on birthright citizenship, the ruling says that individual judges cannot grant nationwide injunctions against presidential policies. Supreme Court analyst Amy Howe and law professo…
…
continue reading