[go: up one dir, main page]

File: FAQ.legal

package info (click to toggle)
coin3 3.1.3-2.2
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: wheezy
  • size: 48,368 kB
  • sloc: cpp: 314,329; ansic: 15,927; sh: 13,635; makefile: 8,772; perl: 2,149; lex: 1,302; lisp: 1,247; yacc: 184; xml: 175; sed: 68
file content (278 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 11,385 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (2)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
	T H E   C O I N   L I C E N S I N G   F A Q


	0 .   G e n e r a l    q u e s t i o n s


Q 0.0:  Coin is under the GNU General Public License ("GPL").
	Can I use it in my proprietary, commercially sold application?

A:      No, the GNU GPL restricts the applications that can use Coin to
	have to be Free Software, and otherwise compatible with the GNU
	GPL.

	The distribution and availability of the Coin library under the
	GNU GPL is primarily meant to be a service for those who write
	other Free Software libraries or applications. If you write
	proprietary software and would like to use the Coin library, see
	the next question.


Q 0.1:  Is it possible to use the Coin library without the restrictions
	of the GNU GPL?

A:      Yes, as a service for those who would like to use the Coin library
	in proprietary software, we at Kongsberg Oil & Gas Technologies
        offer the "Coin Professional Edition License" which buys
	developers that are license holders the option to use the
	library with no strings attached.  The "Coin Professional
	Edition License" covers all the Coin libraries, unless
	otherwise specified.

	By "no strings attached", we of course mean that you as a
	software developer would not have to obey the restrictions of
	the GNU GPL, as you would use the Coin library under our
	"Professional Edition" license instead.

	The Coin Professional Edition License additionally covers
	other libraries in the "Coin family" for no extra cost,
	including all the GUI toolkits (SoQt, SoWin, SoGtk, SoXt,
	Sc21) and Kongsberg Oil & Gas Technologies 3D file format
	libraries Dime and Profit.

	See <URL:http://www.coin3d.org> for more information about the
	details of these libraries.

	Prioritized support services is also part of the package -- your
	support requests will be sent straight to the top of the
	todo-stack of our developers. The developers used as first-tier
	support for our Coin Professional Edition License holders are
	the same people who have written all the sourcecode of the
	library in the first place, so you will be in very good hands.

	We take pride in giving our customers excellent support, and
	since the Coin libraries are what our developers love to work with,
	it's given with a smile.  :-)

	Oh, and one additional benefit from being a Coin Professional
	Edition License holder: you are allowed to cut'n'paste from our
	sourcecode and use it in your own applications without having to
	worry about licensing issues. This is for instance very
	convenient when writing extension components for Coin, like new
	nodes or action types.

	You may also cut'n'paste code from all our example programs in
	the same manner (these are also originally under the GNU GPL, by
	the way).


Q 0.2:  How can you sell a "Professional Edition License" when the
	library is released under the GNU GPL? Wouldn't that be
	disallowed by the GNU GPL?

A:      Kongsberg Oil & Gas Technologies can do this dual licensing
	"trick" with Coin because we are full copyright holders -- ie
	we own every single line of code written for the Coin
	library. Therefore we are able to license the Coin library
	both as Free Software aswell as under a special purpose
	license for proprietary software vendors. (If you are familiar
	with TrollTech's "Qt" library, they use the same strategy.)


Q 0.3:  What happens if I don't renew my Coin PEL? Can I still continue
	using Coin?

A:      Yes. You can continue development using the last version of
	Coin (or any earlier version, if you want) that was released
	while you were a registered PEL holder. Version in this context
	means "release with a unique version number", so for instance
	1.0.0 and 1.0.1 count as different versions.

	Of course you are not allowed to use any version of Coin that
	was released after the expiry date, and you will not get any
	more developer support.


Q 0.4:  Can't I just use the Coin Free Edition to develop my software
	in-house, and then get a PEL and switch to a non-Free license
	just before I release it?

A:      From a strictly legal point of view, this is possible. As
	long as you do not release binaries, you do not need to
	release the source code either, so you can work on a piece of
	software under the terms of the GPL, and then re-license it
	before releasing it.

	We strongly discourage this approach, though, for several
	reasons. First, the Free Edition of Coin is intended for Free
	Software developers, and using it for proprietary development
	obviously is against this intention.

	Second, the PEL is meant to be a per-developer license, taking
	into account that you are likely to need professional support
	when doing your development. By getting a PEL when you start
	developing your software, you can benefit from our priority
	support when you actually need it - during development.

	Third, note that even if you never release the in-house GPL
	version to the public, the terms of the GPL are valid for all
	the people involved in the project. That means that everybody
	with access to the software has the irrevokable right to get
	the source code and distribute it to whomever they want,
	including posting it on public websites etc. - and this would
	be perfectly legal. This is the freedom granted by the GPL,
	and it intentionally clashes with proprietary development.


	I .  C o n c e r n i n g   t h e   n e w   P E L  ( v 2 )


Q 1.0:  I am a Coin PEL holder. What does the new Coin PEL (v2) change for
	me?

A:      Nothing. The new Coin PEL is merely a more detailed specification
	of the currently valid rights and conditions.


Q 1.1:  So then why did you bother making a new one?

A:      In the previous license, many points were either not covered at
	all, or not in enough detail. The many questions that we
	received concerning the actual rights and restrictions showed
	us the importance of clearly stating these things, and the
	Coin-2 release was a good opportunity to put the new license
	in place.


Q 1.2:  So, how about a summary in English instead of Legalese?


A:      My pleasure - here you go. Paragraph by paragraph (note: everything
	that is said about Coin below also applies to the So*
	libraries and Dime/Profit):

	After the definition of what the license is about, and whom it
	concerns, it is stated that SIM is and remains the copyright
	holder and owner of Coin - the license gives you the right to
	use the software, we do not sell it to you.

	You are getting a license for one individual - you, or
	somebody in your company. We are deliberately not restrictive
	about this "in your company", so it's perfectly okay to
	acquire a company license and have an external consultant be
	the actual Coin developer. The important part is the idea that
	it is a personal developer license, not a "site license" or a
	company-wide license. So one license is needed for each
	developer working on Coin-related development.

	The license is valid for one year, after which you will get a
	renewal offer from us.

	You are allowed to use Coin to develop your product, whatever
	that is - except if you are developing a directly competing product.

	You can ship binary version of Coin - modified or unmodified -
	with your product. You are also allowed to distribute the
	source code, but only in unmodified form. If you have changed
	anything, you must distribute the original source code plus
	patches. (See also next question.)

	You will get one year of free upgrades, and you are entitled
	to developer support for that period.

	Now if you don't extend your license after one year, you can
	of course still ship your product. You are also allowed to
	continue doing development using the last version of Coin that
	was released while you had a valid license. You will not get
	any more updates, and you will not get any more support.

	The rest is off-the-shelf legal provisions - standard clauses
	in the (unexpected) case of a lawsuit, statement that we don't
	take any warranty (you are responsible for e.g. loss of data)
	etc.


Q 1.3:  I am allowed to modify the Coin library itself?!

A:      Yup. You are allowed to do that, for instance in order to fix bugs
	or adapt it to your special needs. You are of course not
	allowed to make a modified version of Coin and sell it as your
	own product.  Note that if you have made modifications to the
	Coin library, you are not allowed to distribute the modified
	source code - you have to use source code diffs (patches). You
	are free to distribute a binary of the changed version without
	the need to disclose your source code, but then you can't name
	that binary "Coin". This is necessary to avoid conflicts and
	confusion.


Q 1.4:  If I distribute the Coin source code, under what license is it for
	my customers?

A:      Under the GPL and PEL. The license is connected to
	copyrightable material (in our case, the Coin source code),
	not the modus of distribution. So regardless of how you get
	the source - from SIM, from somebody else's website, from a
	Debian CD, from Santa Claus - it will always be under both the
	GPL and the PEL.  That means that your customers can use the
	Coin source for Free Software development as covered by the
	GPL. For any proprietary development, they must acquire a PEL.



      I I .  C o n c e r n i n g   t h e   F r e e   E d i t i o n  -
	  t h e   s w i t c h   f r o m   L G P L   t o   G P L


Q 2.0:  I am a Coin PEL holder. What does the change from LGPL to GPL
	mean for me?

A:      Nothing at all. Your rights as PEL user are not in any way
	affected by the LGPL or GPL version of Coin.


Q 2.1:  I was using Coin under the LGPL. What does the change from
	LGPL to GPL mean for me?

A:      Both the GPL and the LGPL are Free Software licenses. The
	main difference is that, given that one fulfills a set of
	restrictions on how the executable is distributed, the LGPL
	permits the use of the library in proprietary programs, while
	the GPL does not allow that under any circumstances.

	In the concrete case of Coin, this comes down to:

	If you write a Free Software application, licensed under the
	GPL or another compatible Free Software license, you are
	allowed to link against Coin. If you write a proprietary
	application, you are not allowed to use Coin under the GPL -
	you have to acquire a PEL.


Q 2.2:  Why are you switching from LGPL to GPL?

A:      There two main reasons why we are switching from LGPL to GPL.

	First of all, we strongly believe in Free Software. The idea
	behind the Free Edition is not to give away Coin - we want to
	share our work with the Free Software community, to the
	benefit of those who want to share /their/ software with the
	community. So if you want to develop Free Software, that's
	great, and for that purpose, you are welcome and encouraged to
	use Coin. If you do not develop Free Software, the Free
	Edition simply does not apply to you; that's what the Coin
	Professional Edition is for.

	Secondly, using the GPL instead of the LGPL fits better with
	our business model. Development costs money :) so of course we
	don't want people to develop products (non-Free Software, that
	is) based on Coin without contributing anything to the Coin
	development and maintenance costs.



References:

  PEL |  http://www.coin3d.org/licensing/coin3d/Coin-PEL.txt
  GPL |  http://www.fsf.org/licenses/gpl.txt
 LGPL |  http://www.fsf.org/licenses/lgpl.txt