Nobody on our team wants to edit. Everybody can kind of do it, but nobody was hired to do that. So projects that need peer review or 'a quick glance' get sidelined for days and then nobody is happy. Having a destination where we can send everything and trust that it's been thoroughly reviewed makes it so much easier to push content through a repeatable process.
Their team is constantly updating the product and dashboard experience and open to feedback on how we integrate it with the rest of our editorial pipeline. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Like all productized services your team has to get used to submitting projects and then following up on them, but that would be true of any other editing process we introduced, too.
It's also hard to distinguish sometimes what type of editing can and can't be outsourced. It's unreasonable for us to expect EditorNinja to fact check high expertise content, but, can be hard to teach each team member the difference between proofreading and structural edits and fact checking, etc. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Validated through a business email account
Organic review. This review was written entirely without invitation or incentive from G2, a seller, or an affiliate.