QUIC Cloud Reviews & Product Details

Best CDN if used with Litespeed server and Litespeed cache plugin. Top level speed booster for WordPress websites. Includes page and image optimization along with UCSS/CCSS generation. Advanced security features available to save web server from bots and hackers. Customer support is good, replying quickly but hardly get any final solution. Asked me to hire them for $1000/site. Also easy to integate and implementation is quick. No need to be a techy guy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Prebuilt system to block Bad Bots and User Agents are not available. Users need to manually include. for that reason CDN bandwidth exhausts quickly leading to buy credits. Available Security features may enough but site level security also needed.

I am using Openlitespeed Server + Lightspeed Cache Plugin + QUIC,cloud cdn for my website https://cbshop.in where the speed is excellent and showing very good pagespeed score but one disadvantage of QUIC CDN is that some ISP (Internet Service Provider) blocked the IPs of QUIC CDN. That's why my website is not accessible from that ISP. It's very frustrating and lead to the doubt in respect of QUIC CDN security and trust. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I have been using Quic.cloud for a long time and it works amazing for WordPress websites. I use it on my name websites in my daily life, and they all work amazingly. The best things about quic.cloud are its full-page caching, Free DNS and fantastic compatibility with the LiteSpeed cache plugin.

Also, customer support is good and it is ticket based. The best part of it is we can use it with Cloudflare DNS. We can easily set up Quic cloud with Cloudflare DNS or any other DNS. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Support is good but the response time on the ticket is huge. It takes around 24hr that is not good for this type of business.

The pricing in Asia region is very high compared to other services like Bunny and Cloudflare.

Also, need to improve its UCSS and other semiler services. On-the-fly-image optimization is also missing here. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Easy to understand, with a good work-flow.

If there are any areas that need attention the platform makes them easy to fix.

Like how you can determine which geographical areas get the benefit of the CDN, wherever you get your traffic from.

Very easy to integrate within the WordPress environment. If you are a beginneer to CDN's then you will like the ease of implementation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

None spring to mind. Have used the platform with all my WordPress installations running on LiteSpeed server for over 3 years. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use QUIC.Cloud to supercharge my LiteSpeed WordPress clients to optimise for speed and reliability. It is incredible because I can always use the free plan combined with bespoke purchases of new specific optimisations. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really would love its CDN to be faster. I tried so much to make it work, but could not. Despite that, sometimes it will lose synch with the LiteSpeed plugin for WordPress, which can literally block all optimisations from happening and the pages will barely load. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

When used properly with a Litespeed server and Litespeed plugin on a WordPress site, page speed scores were higher than while using Cloudflare with an identical build. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Too many individual possible charges if you wish to keep your website at the top of the pile. QUIC needs to implement a simpler payment model.

More complex interface and integration than Cloudflare. A simpler interface needs implemented. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The speed once configured and the amount of functionality available is great. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Difficult to set up. Too many options and not enough guidance. I don't want to spend days reading FAQs and Knowledge Bases when other caching plugins do this for me. Lack of clear information when errors/warnings occur, too much technical language. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.