Dror et al., 2010 - Google Patents
The use of technology in human expert domains: challenges and risks arising from the use of automated fingerprint identification systems in forensic scienceDror et al., 2010
View PDF- Document ID
- 5101163605371999682
- Author
- Dror I
- Mnookin J
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Law, Probability & Risk
External Links
Snippet
Cognitive technologies have increased in sophistication and use, to the point of interactively collaborating and distributing cognition between technology and humans. The use of Automated Fingerprint Identification Systems (AFIS), computerized databases of fingerprints …
- 238000005516 engineering process 0 title abstract description 119
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Dror et al. | The use of technology in human expert domains: challenges and risks arising from the use of automated fingerprint identification systems in forensic science | |
| Grother et al. | Face recognition vendor test (fvrt): Part 3, demographic effects | |
| Garrett et al. | How jurors evaluate fingerprint evidence: The relative importance of match language, method information, and error acknowledgment | |
| Tan et al. | Social desirability and sexual offenders: A review | |
| Dror et al. | The impact of human–technology cooperation and distributed cognition in forensic science: Biasing effects of AFIS contextual information on human experts | |
| Haber et al. | Scientific validation of fingerprint evidence under Daubert | |
| Mnookin | The courts, the NAS, and the future of forensic science | |
| Thompson et al. | How cross‐examination on subjectivity and bias affects jurors’ evaluations of forensic science evidence | |
| Hofmann et al. | Treatment of inconclusives in the AFTE range of conclusions | |
| Paone et al. | Double trouble: Differentiating identical twins by face recognition | |
| Sutrop et al. | From identity verification to behavior prediction: Ethical implications of second generation biometrics | |
| Searston et al. | Putting bias into context: The role of familiarity in identification. | |
| Shoewu et al. | Biometric-based attendance system: LASU Epe campus as case study | |
| Neumann et al. | Statistical support for conclusions in fingerprint examinations | |
| Hu et al. | Person recognition: Qualitative differences in how forensic face examiners and untrained people rely on the face versus the body for identification | |
| Cino et al. | The oracle testifies: Facial recognition technology as evidence in criminal courtrooms | |
| Eldridge | The shifting landscape of latent print testimony: an American perspective | |
| Kaasa et al. | Statistical inference and forensic evidence: Evaluating a bullet lead match | |
| Girelli | Laterally Reversed Fingerprints Detected in Fake Documents. | |
| Cole et al. | Certainty, Indvidualisation and the Subjective Nature of Expert Fingerprint Evidence | |
| Jeckeln et al. | Confidence judgments are associated with face identification accuracy: Findings from a confidence forced-choice task | |
| JP6792751B2 (en) | Classification system | |
| Neumann et al. | Forensic examination of fingerprints: past, present, and future | |
| Kaye et al. | Latent Print Examination and Human Factors: Improving the Practice Through a Systems Approach: The Report of the Expert Working Group on Human Factors in Latent Print Analysis | |
| Pena et al. | The effects of cognitive bias, examiner expertise, and stimulus material on forensic evidence analysis |