Hofmann et al., 2025 - Google Patents
Marginal Quality and Wear of Bulk-Fill Composites: Differences Between DentitionsHofmann et al., 2025
View HTML- Document ID
- 5570575747071813340
- Author
- Hofmann M
- Wolf E
- Lücker S
- Frankenberger R
- Wöstmann B
- Krämer N
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry
External Links
Snippet
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the marginal quality and wear of bulk-fill composite resins (BFs) for Class-II restorations of primary and permanent molars in comparison to a conventionally layered composite resin (RC) and to compare the results of …
- 210000004513 dentition 0 title abstract description 8
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL, OR TOILET PURPOSES
- A61K6/00—Preparations for dentistry
- A61K6/02—Use of preparations for artificial teeth, for filling or for capping teeth
- A61K6/08—Use of natural or synthetic resins
- A61K6/083—Compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL, OR TOILET PURPOSES
- A61K6/00—Preparations for dentistry
- A61K6/02—Use of preparations for artificial teeth, for filling or for capping teeth
- A61K6/08—Use of natural or synthetic resins
- A61K6/087—Compounds obtained otherwise than by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C19/00—Dental auxiliary appliances
- A61C19/04—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry
- A61C19/05—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry for determining occlusion
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL, OR TOILET PURPOSES
- A61K6/00—Preparations for dentistry
- A61K6/007—Preparations for dentistry characterized by the presence of inorganic additives
- A61K6/0073—Fillers
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL, OR TOILET PURPOSES
- A61K6/00—Preparations for dentistry
- A61K6/02—Use of preparations for artificial teeth, for filling or for capping teeth
- A61K6/027—Use of non-metallic elements or compounds thereof, e.g. carbon
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL, OR TOILET PURPOSES
- A61K6/00—Preparations for dentistry
- A61K6/10—Compositions for taking dental impressions
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL, OR TOILET PURPOSES
- A61K6/00—Preparations for dentistry
- A61K6/0023—Chemical means for temporarily or permanently fixing teeth, palates or the like
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL, OR TOILET PURPOSES
- A61K6/00—Preparations for dentistry
- A61K6/0002—Compositions characterised by physical properties
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL, OR TOILET PURPOSES
- A61K6/00—Preparations for dentistry
- A61K6/0047—Preparations for dentistry characterised by the presence of organic or organo-metallic additives
- A61K6/0067—Medicaments; Drugs
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C5/00—Filling or capping teeth
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C13/00—Dental prostheses; Making same
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL, OR TOILET PURPOSES
- A61K9/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
- A61K9/0012—Galenical forms characterised by the site of application
- A61K9/0053—Mouth and digestive tract, i.e. intraoral and peroral administration
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL, OR TOILET PURPOSES
- A61K31/00—Medicinal preparations containing organic active ingredients
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL, OR TOILET PURPOSES
- A61K39/00—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C7/00—Orthodontics, i.e. obtaining or maintaining the desired position of teeth, e.g. by straightening, evening, regulating, separating, or by correcting malocclusions
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C8/00—Means to be fixed to the jaw-bone for consolidating natural teeth or for fixing dental prostheses thereon; Dental implants; Implanting tools
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Heintze et al. | Clinical efficacy of resin-based direct posterior restorations and glass-ionomer restorations–An updated meta-analysis of clinical outcome parameters | |
| Frankenberger et al. | Marginal integrity: is the clinical performance of bonded restorations predictable in vitro? | |
| Hahn et al. | Influence of resin cement viscosity on microleakage of ceramic inlays | |
| van Dijken et al. | Randomized 3-year clinical evaluation of Class I and II posterior resin restorations placed with a bulk-fill resin composite and a one-step self-etching adhesive | |
| Mounajjed et al. | Effect of different resin luting cements on the marginal fit of lithium disilicate pressed crowns | |
| Toman et al. | Clinical evaluation of 121 lithium disilicate all-ceramic crowns up to 9 years. | |
| Isufi et al. | Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with a bulkfill flowable material and a resin composite | |
| Atabek et al. | Two-year clinical performance of sonic-resin placement system in posterior restorations. | |
| Aggarwal et al. | Effect of cyclic loading on marginal adaptation and bond strength in direct vs indirect class II MO composite restorations | |
| Frascino et al. | Randomized prospective clinical trial of class II restorations using low-shrinkage flowable resin composite | |
| Kar et al. | Effect of different ferrule length on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: An in vitro study | |
| Naumann et al. | The effect of alveolar bone loss on the load capability of restored endodontically treated teeth: a comparative in vitro study | |
| Oberländer et al. | Clinical evaluation of packable composite resins in Class-II restorations | |
| Kaur et al. | Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with different core build-up materials: An in vitro study | |
| Teymoornezhad et al. | Evaluating the microshear bond strength and microleakage of flowable composites containing zinc oxide nano-particles | |
| Karaarslan et al. | Clinical evaluation of direct composite restorations and inlays: Results at 12 months | |
| Aboelenein et al. | Effect of a self-etch adhesive containing nanobioglass on postoperative sensitivity of posterior composite restorations-a randomized trial | |
| Al Sheikh | Marginal adaptation of different bulk-fill composites: a microcomputed tomography evaluation | |
| Al-Nahedh | Effects of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and flowable bulk-fill base on the fracture resistance of class II restorations: an original laboratory experimental study | |
| Hofmann et al. | Marginal Quality and Wear of Bulk-Fill Composites: Differences Between Dentitions | |
| Mehesen et al. | Scan electron microscope evaluation of marginal adaptation of alkasite, bulk-fil resin composite, resin modified glass ionomer, and high viscosity glass ionomer restorative materials | |
| Burke et al. | Fifty years of glass ionomers (GICs). Are the latest GICs suitable for restoring back teeth? | |
| Cerutti et al. | Clinical performance of posterior microhybrid resin composite restorations applied using regular and high-power mode polymerization protocols according to USPHS and SQUACE criteria: 10-year randomized controlled split-mouth trial | |
| Yildiz et al. | Fracture strength of restorations in proximal cavities of primary molars | |
| Borges et al. | Compressive strength recovery by composite onlays in primary teeth: Substrate treatment and luting agent effects |