[go: up one dir, main page]

Narayanaswami, 2017 - Google Patents

The spectrum of functional rating scales in neurology clinical trials

Narayanaswami, 2017

View HTML
Document ID
711324675135942394
Author
Narayanaswami P
Publication year
Publication venue
Neurotherapeutics

External Links

Snippet

The selection of an appropriate outcome measure is crucial to the success of a clinical trial, in order to obtain accurate results, which, in turn, influence patient care and future research. Outcomes that can be directly measured are mortality/survival. More frequently, neurology …
Continue reading at www.sciencedirect.com (HTML) (other versions)

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • G06F19/34—Computer-assisted medical diagnosis or treatment, e.g. computerised prescription or delivery of medication or diets, computerised local control of medical devices, medical expert systems or telemedicine
    • G06F19/345—Medical expert systems, neural networks or other automated diagnosis
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • G06F19/34—Computer-assisted medical diagnosis or treatment, e.g. computerised prescription or delivery of medication or diets, computerised local control of medical devices, medical expert systems or telemedicine
    • G06F19/3431—Calculating a health index for the patient, e.g. for risk assessment
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • G06F19/34—Computer-assisted medical diagnosis or treatment, e.g. computerised prescription or delivery of medication or diets, computerised local control of medical devices, medical expert systems or telemedicine
    • G06F19/3487—Medical report generation
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • G06F19/32—Medical data management, e.g. systems or protocols for archival or communication of medical images, computerised patient records or computerised general medical references
    • G06F19/322—Management of patient personal data, e.g. patient records, conversion of records or privacy aspects
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • G06F19/36—Computer-assisted acquisition of medical data, e.g. computerised clinical trials or questionnaires
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups
    • G01N33/48—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/68—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving proteins, peptides or amino acids
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/10—Bioinformatics, i.e. methods or systems for genetic or protein-related data processing in computational molecular biology
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using infra-red, visible or ultra-violet light
    • G01N21/17—Systems in which incident light is modified in accordance with the properties of the material investigated

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Narayanaswami The spectrum of functional rating scales in neurology clinical trials
Chaturvedi et al. Evaluation of inter-rater agreement and inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview of concepts and methods
Gold DSM-5 and the assessment of functioning: the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0)
Schwartz et al. Measurement of fatigue: determining minimally important clinical differences
Wyrwich Minimal important difference thresholds and the standard error of measurement: is there a connection?
Abbott et al. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale was valid for group-level change comparisons and between-group discrimination
Monticone et al. Responsiveness of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia in Italian subjects with chronic low back pain undergoing motor and cognitive rehabilitation
Martinez-Martin Composite rating scales
Naik et al. Evaluating fatigue in patients recovering from COVID-19: validation of the fatigue severity scale and single item screening questions
Chuang et al. Reliability and validity of a vertical numerical rating scale supplemented with a faces rating scale in measuring fatigue after stroke
Arrondo et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis: clinical utility of continuous performance tests for the identification of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
Ferro et al. Health-related quality of life in children with and without physical–mental multimorbidity
Leske et al. Test–retest reliability of health-related quality-of-life questionnaires in adults with strabismus
Taghizadeh et al. King’s Parkinson’s disease pain scale cut-off points for detection of pain severity levels: a reliability and validity study
Chapman et al. Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease using neuropsychological testing improved by multivariate analyses
Lopez et al. Measuring the reliability of proxy respondents in behavioural assessments: an open question
Edavalath et al. Methodology for developing and evaluating diagnostic tools in Ayurveda–a review
Villepinte et al. Validation of French upper limb Erasmus modified Nottingham Sensory Assessment in stroke
Egashira et al. The Japan Frailty Scale is a promising screening test for frailty and pre-frailty in Japanese elderly people
Globe et al. Psychometric properties of the asthma symptom diary (ASD), a diary for use in clinical trials of persistent asthma
Koscik et al. Longitudinal standards for mid-life cognitive performance: Identifying abnormal within-person changes in the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer’s Prevention
Whiteneck Issues affecting the selection of participation measurement in outcomes research and clinical trials
Emert et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Insomnia Severity Index in US college students
Prins et al. Availability and usability of data for medical practice assessment
Metz et al. Validity of patient-reported health-related quality of life global ratings of change using structural equation modeling