[go: up one dir, main page]

Carvalho Neto et al., 2021 - Google Patents

Assessment of the angle of progression and distance perineum-head in the prediction of type of delivery and duration of labor using intrapartum ultrasonography

Carvalho Neto et al., 2021

View PDF
Document ID
7168217800549124801
Author
Carvalho Neto R
Viana Junior A
Moron A
Araujo Junior E
Carvalho F
Feitosa H
Publication year
Publication venue
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine

External Links

Snippet

Objective To evaluate the relevance of the angle of progression (AOP) and head-perineum distance (HPD) for predicting the type of delivery and duration of the second stage of labor using intrapartum ultrasonography. Methods In total, 221 women in labor with a single …
Continue reading at www.academia.edu (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/43—Detecting, measuring or recording for evaluating the reproductive systems
    • A61B5/4306—Detecting, measuring or recording for evaluating the reproductive systems for evaluating the female reproductive systems, e.g. gynaecological evaluations
    • A61B5/4343—Pregnancy and labour monitoring, e.g. for labour onset detection
    • A61B5/435—Assessing cervix alteration or dilation
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B8/00—Diagnosis using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves
    • A61B8/08—Detecting organic movements or changes, e.g. tumours, cysts, swellings
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups
    • G01N33/48—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/68—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving proteins, peptides or amino acids
    • G01N33/689—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving proteins, peptides or amino acids related to pregnancy or the gonads
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B8/00—Diagnosis using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves
    • A61B8/52—Devices using data or image processing specially adapted for diagnosis using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves
    • A61B8/5215—Devices using data or image processing specially adapted for diagnosis using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves involving processing of medical diagnostic data
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/02—Detecting, measuring or recording pulse, heart rate, blood pressure or blood flow; Combined pulse/heart-rate/blood pressure determination; Evaluating a cardiovascular condition not otherwise provided for, e.g. using combinations of techniques provided for in this group with electrocardiography or electroauscultation; Heart catheters for measuring blood pressure
    • A61B5/024—Detecting, measuring or recording pulse rate or heart rate
    • A61B5/02411—Detecting, measuring or recording pulse rate or heart rate of foetuses
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • G06F19/32—Medical data management, e.g. systems or protocols for archival or communication of medical images, computerised patient records or computerised general medical references
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/01—Measuring temperature of body parts; Diagnostic temperature sensing, e.g. for malignant or inflammed tissue
    • A61B5/015—By temperature mapping of body part
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • G06F19/34—Computer-assisted medical diagnosis or treatment, e.g. computerised prescription or delivery of medication or diets, computerised local control of medical devices, medical expert systems or telemedicine
    • G06F19/3487—Medical report generation
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/48—Other medical applications
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/04—Detecting, measuring or recording bioelectric signals of the body of parts thereof
    • A61B5/0402—Electrocardiography, i.e. ECG
    • A61B5/0444—Foetal cardiography
    • A61B5/0448—Electrodes specially adapted therefor, e.g. scalp electrodes
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B10/00—Other methods or instruments for diagnosis, e.g. instruments for taking a cell sample, for biopsy, for vaccination diagnosis; Sex determination; Ovulation-period determination; Throat striking implements
    • A61B10/0012—Ovulation-period determination
    • A61B2010/0016—Ovulation-period determination based on measurement of electric currents, e.g. conductivity tests
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B8/00—Diagnosis using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves
    • A61B8/48—Diagnostic techniques

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Carvalho Neto et al. Assessment of the angle of progression and distance perineum-head in the prediction of type of delivery and duration of labor using intrapartum ultrasonography
Dziadosz et al. Uterocervical angle: a novel ultrasound screening tool to predict spontaneous preterm birth
Eggebø et al. A model to predict vaginal delivery in nulliparous women based on maternal characteristics and intrapartum ultrasound
Malvasi et al. Occiput posterior position diagnosis: vaginal examination or intrapartum sonography? A clinical review
Sainz et al. Utility of intrapartum transperineal ultrasound to predict cases of failure in vacuum extraction attempt and need of cesarean section to complete delivery
Malvasi et al. Intrapartum sonography for fetal head asynclitism and transverse position: sonographic signs and comparison of diagnostic performance between transvaginal and digital examination
Chan et al. Is intrapartum translabial ultrasound examination painless?
Eggebø et al. Can ultrasound measurements replace digitally assessed elements of the Bishop score?
Chor et al. Prediction of labor outcome using serial transperineal ultrasound in the first stage of labor
Alouini et al. Diagnosis and management of placenta previa and low placental implantation
Luechathananon et al. Uterocervical angle and cervical length as a tool to predict preterm birth in threatened preterm labor
Plasencia et al. Comparative study of transabdominal and transvaginal uterine artery Doppler pulsatility indices at 11–13+ 6 weeks
Sainz et al. Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound as a predictor of instrumentation difficulty with vacuum-assisted delivery in primiparous women
Chan et al. Relationship between intrapartum transperineal ultrasound measurement of angle of progression and head–perineum distance with correlation to conventional clinical parameters of labor progress and time to delivery
Wiafe et al. Intrapartum ultrasound assessment of cervical dilatation and its value in detecting active labor
Youssef et al. Dynamic changes of fetal head descent at term before the onset of labor correlate with labor outcome and can be improved by ultrasound visual feedback
Antonio Sainz et al. Intrapartum translabial ultrasound with pushing used to predict the difficulty in vacuum-assisted delivery of fetuses in non-occiput posterior position
Kamel et al. Reliability of transperineal ultrasound for the assessment of the angle of progression in labor using parasagittal approach versus midsagittal approach
Comas et al. Ultrasound examination at term for predicting the outcome of delivery in women with a previous cesarean section
Gauthier et al. Transperineal versus transvaginal ultrasound cervical length measurement and preterm labor
Kim et al. A longitudinal study investigating cervical changes during labor using a wireless ultrasound device
Ginsberg et al. It is about time. The advantage of transabdominal cervical length screening
Dimassi et al. Agreement between digital vaginal examination and intrapartum ultrasound for labour monitoring
Ghi et al. Sonographic assessment of fetal occiput position during the second stage of labor: how reliable is the transperineal approach?
Weitzner et al. Can sonographic measurements and changes in cervical length during pregnancy predict preterm labour in an asymptomatic low-risk population?