Hernandez et al., 2020 - Google Patents
Effects of kV, filtration, dose, and object size on soft tissue and iodine contrast in dedicated breast CTHernandez et al., 2020
View PDF- Document ID
- 7670059685181698160
- Author
- Hernandez A
- Abbey C
- Ghazi P
- Burkett G
- Boone J
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Medical physics
External Links
Snippet
Purpose Clinical use of dedicated breast computed tomography (bCT) requires relatively short scan times necessitating systems with high frame rates. This in turn impacts the x‐ray tube operating range. We characterize the effects of tube voltage, beam filtration, dose, and …
- 210000000481 Breast 0 title abstract description 85
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/02—Devices for diagnosis sequentially in different planes; Stereoscopic radiation diagnosis
- A61B6/03—Computerised tomographs
- A61B6/032—Transmission computed tomography [CT]
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/48—Diagnostic techniques
- A61B6/482—Diagnostic techniques involving multiple energy imaging
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/50—Clinical applications
- A61B6/507—Clinical applications involving determination of haemodynamic parameters, e.g. perfusion CT
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T11/00—2D [Two Dimensional] image generation
- G06T11/003—Reconstruction from projections, e.g. tomography
- G06T11/005—Specific pre-processing for tomographic reconstruction, e.g. calibration, source positioning, rebinning, scatter correction, retrospective gating
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/58—Testing, adjusting or calibrating devices for radiation diagnosis
- A61B6/582—Calibration
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T11/00—2D [Two Dimensional] image generation
- G06T11/003—Reconstruction from projections, e.g. tomography
- G06T11/006—Inverse problem, transformation from projection-space into object-space, e.g. transform methods, back-projection, algebraic methods
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/42—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment with arrangements for detecting radiation specially adapted for radiation diagnosis
- A61B6/4291—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment with arrangements for detecting radiation specially adapted for radiation diagnosis the detector being combined with a grid or grating
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/40—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment with arrangements for generating radiation specially adapted for radiation diagnosis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2211/00—Image generation
- G06T2211/40—Computed tomography
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
- G06T2207/10—Image acquisition modality
- G06T2207/10072—Tomographic images
- G06T2207/10084—Hybrid tomography; Concurrent acquisition with multiple different tomographic modalities
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Tzedakis et al. | The effect of overscanning on patient effective dose from multidetector helical computed tomography examinations | |
| Miéville et al. | Iterative reconstruction methods in two different MDCT scanners: physical metrics and 4-alternative forced-choice detectability experiments–a phantom approach | |
| Samei et al. | Assessment of the dose reduction potential of a model‐based iterative reconstruction algorithm using a task‐based performance metrology | |
| Sechopoulos | A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part I. The image acquisition process | |
| Hernandez et al. | Effects of kV, filtration, dose, and object size on soft tissue and iodine contrast in dedicated breast CT | |
| Zhao et al. | Experimental validation of a three‐dimensional linear system model for breast tomosynthesis | |
| Prakash et al. | Task‐based modeling and optimization of a cone‐beam CT scanner for musculoskeletal imaging | |
| Siewerdsen et al. | The influence of antiscatter grids on soft‐tissue detectability in cone‐beam computed tomography with flat‐panel detectors: antiscatter grids in cone‐beam CT | |
| Lai et al. | Visibility of microcalcification in cone beam breast CT: Effects of x‐ray tube voltage and radiation dose | |
| Massoumzadeh et al. | Validation of CT dose‐reduction simulation | |
| Raupach et al. | Performance evaluation of x‐ray differential phase contrast computed tomography (PCT) with respect to medical imaging | |
| Yang et al. | Noise power properties of a cone‐beam CT system for breast cancer detection | |
| Persson et al. | Upper limits of the photon fluence rate on CT detectors: case study on a commercial scanner | |
| Petersilka et al. | Strategies for scatter correction in dual source CT | |
| Wang et al. | Scatter correction for cone‐beam computed tomography using moving blocker strips: a preliminary study | |
| Sechopoulos | X‐ray scatter correction method for dedicated breast computed tomography | |
| Wang et al. | Low‐dose preview for patient‐specific, task‐specific technique selection in cone‐beam CT | |
| Richard et al. | Quantitative imaging in breast tomosynthesis and CT: Comparison of detection and estimation task performance | |
| Chen et al. | Feasibility of volume‐of‐interest (VOI) scanning technique in cone beam breast CT—a preliminary study | |
| Das et al. | Evaluation of a variable dose acquisition technique for microcalcification and mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis | |
| Bartolac et al. | A local shift‐variant Fourier model and experimental validation of circular cone‐beam computed tomography artifacts | |
| Mettivier et al. | Cone‐beam breast computed tomography with a displaced flat panel detector array | |
| Hernandez et al. | Average glandular dose coefficients for pendant‐geometry breast CT using realistic breast phantoms | |
| Sanchez et al. | Task‐based optimization of dedicated breast CT via Hotelling observer metrics | |
| Hernandez et al. | Updated breast CT dose coefficients (Dg NCT) using patient‐derived breast shapes and heterogeneous fibroglandular distributions |