Börjesson et al., 2015 - Google Patents
Bioenergy futures in Sweden–system effects of CO 2 reduction and fossil fuel phase‐out policiesBörjesson et al., 2015
View PDF- Document ID
- 8581953735578083332
- Author
- Börjesson M
- Athanassiadis D
- Lundmark R
- Ahlgren E
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Gcb Bioenergy
External Links
Snippet
Bioenergy could contribute both to the reduction of greenhouse gases and to increased energy security, but the extent of this contribution strongly depends on the cost and potential of biomass resources. For Sweden, this study investigates how the implementation of …
- 230000001603 reducing 0 title abstract description 51
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
- G06Q10/063—Operations research or analysis
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GASES [GHG] EMISSION, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E50/00—Technologies for the production of fuel of non-fossil origin
- Y02E50/10—Biofuels
- Y02E50/12—Gas turbines for biofeed
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GASES [GHG] EMISSION, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E50/00—Technologies for the production of fuel of non-fossil origin
- Y02E50/30—Fuel from waste
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Thengane et al. | Market prospects for biochar production and application in California | |
| Cuong et al. | Renewable energy from biomass surplus resource: potential of power generation from rice straw in Vietnam | |
| Börjesson et al. | Bioenergy futures in Sweden–system effects of CO 2 reduction and fossil fuel phase‐out policies | |
| Seabra et al. | Life cycle assessment of Brazilian sugarcane products: GHG emissions and energy use | |
| Whitaker et al. | Sources of variability in greenhouse gas and energy balances for biofuel production: a systematic review | |
| Börjesson et al. | Biofuel futures in road transport–A modeling analysis for Sweden | |
| Ahtikoski et al. | Economic viability of utilizing biomass energy from young stands—The case of Finland | |
| Mai‐Moulin et al. | Sourcing overseas biomass for EU ambitions: assessing net sustainable export potential from various sourcing countries | |
| Vera et al. | Supply potential of lignocellulosic energy crops grown on marginal land and greenhouse gas footprint of advanced biofuels—A spatially explicit assessment under the sustainability criteria of the Renewable Energy Directive Recast | |
| Mourad et al. | The energy balance of soybean biodiesel in Brazil: a case study | |
| Shafie et al. | Rice straw supply chain for electricity generation in Malaysia: economical and environmental assessment | |
| Van Der Hilst et al. | Spatiotemporal cost‐supply curves for bioenergy production in Mozambique | |
| Beach et al. | Modeling bioenergy, land use, and GHG emissions with FASOMGHG: model overview and analysis of storage cost implications | |
| Kalinichenko et al. | Feasibility study of biogas project development: technology maturity, feedstock, and utilization pathway | |
| Weldu et al. | Evaluating the environmental sustainability of biomass-based energy strategy: Using an impact matrix framework | |
| Chala et al. | Biomass energy in malaysia-A SWOT analysis | |
| Szulczyk et al. | Bioelectricity in Malaysia: economic feasibility, environmental and deforestation implications | |
| Rentizelas | Biomass supply chains | |
| Meisel et al. | Quo Vadis, Biomass? Long‐Term Scenarios of an Optimal Energetic Use of Biomass for the German Energy Transition | |
| Garoma et al. | Comparative resource analyses for ethanol produced from corn and sugarcane in different climatic zones | |
| Silalertruksa et al. | Sustainability assessment of palm biodiesel production in Thailand | |
| Börjesson et al. | Sustainable vehicle fuels-do they exist? | |
| Kurowska et al. | Determinants of biomass production for energy purposes in North-Eastern Poland | |
| Jozami et al. | Techno-economic assessment of biomass gasification of Spartina argentinensis | |
| Korhaliller | The UK’s biomass energy development path |