[go: up one dir, main page]

Li et al., 2000 - Google Patents

Quantitative evaluation of surgical task performance by remote-access endoscopic telemanipulation

Li et al., 2000

Document ID
8880644310752426811
Author
Li R
Jensen J
Hill J
Bowersox J
Publication year
Publication venue
Surgical endoscopy

External Links

Snippet

Background: The performance limitations inherent in minimally invasive surgery may be overcome by using an interface that provides intuitive orientation for video display and tool manipulation. A prototype remote-access endoscopic telemanipulator was designed to fulfill …
Continue reading at link.springer.com (other versions)

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/00234—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets for minimally invasive surgery
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/34—Trocars; Puncturing needles
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
    • G09B23/00—Models for scientific, medical, or mathematical purposes, e.g. full-sized devices for demonstration purposes
    • G09B23/28—Models for scientific, medical, or mathematical purposes, e.g. full-sized devices for demonstration purposes for medicine
    • G09B23/285—Models for scientific, medical, or mathematical purposes, e.g. full-sized devices for demonstration purposes for medicine for injections, endoscopy, bronchoscopy, sigmoidscopy, insertion of contraceptive devices or enemas
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/28—Surgical forceps
    • A61B17/29—Forceps for use in minimally invasive surgery
    • A61B2017/2926—Details of heads or jaws
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/11—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets for performing anastomosis; Buttons for anastomosis
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B1/00—Instruments for performing medical examinations of the interior of cavities or tubes of the body by visual or photographical inspection, e.g. endoscopes; Illuminating arrangements therefor
    • A61B1/005—Flexible endoscopes
    • A61B1/0051—Flexible endoscopes with controlled bending of insertion part
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B1/00—Instruments for performing medical examinations of the interior of cavities or tubes of the body by visual or photographical inspection, e.g. endoscopes; Illuminating arrangements therefor
    • A61B1/00002—Operational features of endoscopes
    • A61B1/00043—Operational features of endoscopes provided with signal output arrangements
    • A61B1/00045—Display arrangement
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B8/00—Diagnosis using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Guthart et al. The Intuitive/sup TM/telesurgery system: overview and application
Sung et al. Robotic laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of the da Vinci and Zeus systems
Bethea et al. Application of haptic feedback to robotic surgery
Hill et al. Telepresence surgery demonstration system
Freschi et al. Technical review of the da Vinci surgical telemanipulator
Horgan et al. Robots in laparoscopic surgery
Bowersox et al. Vascular applications of telepresence surgery: initial feasibility studies in swine
Rassweiler et al. Telesurgical Laparoscopic Radical ProstatectomyInitial Experience
GILL et al. ROBOTIC REMOTE LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY AND ADRENALECTOMY:: THE INITIAL EXPERIENCE
Prasad et al. The effect of robotic assistance on learning curves for basic laparoscopic skills
Rassweiler et al. Robotics and telesurgery–an update on their position in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
Perkins et al. Learning to use minimal access surgical instruments and 2-dimensional remote visual feedback: how difficult is the task for novices?
Lorincz et al. Robotics and the pediatric surgeon
Broeders et al. Robotics revolutionizing surgery: The intuitive surgical “da Vinci” system
Lai et al. Evaluating control modes for constrained robotic surgery
Kakeji et al. Robotic laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: a comparison of the da Vinci and Zeus systems
Li et al. Quantitative evaluation of surgical task performance by remote-access endoscopic telemanipulation
Narula et al. Robotic surgical systems
Shah et al. Performance of basic manipulation and intracorporeal suturing tasks in a robotic surgical system: single-versus dual-monitor views
Klein et al. LAP
Rassweiler, T. Frede, O. Seemann, C. Stock, L. Sentker Telepresence surgery: first experiences with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
De Smet et al. Multimodal Robot-Assisted Instrument Interaction for Solo Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
Hodgson et al. The effects of physical constraints in laparoscopic surgery
EP4607495A1 (en) Medical training system and method for medical training
Schurr et al. Systems technology in the operating theatre: a prerequisite for the use of advanced devices in surgery