Young et al., 2022 - Google Patents
Examination of a foot mounted IMU-based methodology for a running gait assessmentYoung et al., 2022
View HTML- Document ID
- 11679768215657557019
- Author
- Young F
- Mason R
- Wall C
- Morris R
- Stuart S
- Godfrey A
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
External Links
Snippet
Gait assessment is essential to understand injury prevention mechanisms during running, where high-impact forces can lead to a range of injuries in the lower extremities. Information regarding the running style to increase efficiency and/or selection of the correct running …
- 238000000034 method 0 title abstract description 21
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
- G06F19/34—Computer-assisted medical diagnosis or treatment, e.g. computerised prescription or delivery of medication or diets, computerised local control of medical devices, medical expert systems or telemedicine
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
- A61B5/1121—Determining geometric values, e.g. centre of rotation or angular range of movement
- A61B5/1122—Determining geometric values, e.g. centre of rotation or angular range of movement of movement trajectories
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/68—Arrangements of detecting, measuring or recording means, e.g. sensors, in relation to patient
- A61B5/6801—Arrangements of detecting, measuring or recording means, e.g. sensors, in relation to patient specially adapted to be attached to or worn on the body surface
- A61B5/6813—Specially adapted to be attached to a specific body part
- A61B5/6829—Foot or ankle
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/68—Arrangements of detecting, measuring or recording means, e.g. sensors, in relation to patient
- A61B5/6801—Arrangements of detecting, measuring or recording means, e.g. sensors, in relation to patient specially adapted to be attached to or worn on the body surface
- A61B5/6802—Sensor mounted on worn items
- A61B5/681—Wristwatch-type devices
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/1036—Measuring load distribution, e.g. podologic studies
- A61B5/1038—Measuring plantar pressure during gait
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/45—For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
- A61B5/4528—Joints
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T7/00—Image analysis
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Young et al. | Examination of a foot mounted IMU-based methodology for a running gait assessment | |
| Norris et al. | Method analysis of accelerometers and gyroscopes in running gait: A systematic review | |
| Sheerin et al. | The one-week and six-month reliability and variability of three-dimensional tibial acceleration in runners | |
| Mentiplay et al. | Three-dimensional assessment of squats and drop jumps using the Microsoft Xbox One Kinect: Reliability and validity | |
| DeJong et al. | Validation of foot-strike assessment using wearable sensors during running | |
| Millour et al. | A literature overview of modern biomechanical-based technologies for bike-fitting professionals and coaches | |
| Fokkenrood et al. | Physical activity monitoring in patients with peripheral arterial disease: validation of an activity monitor | |
| Callaghan et al. | The relationship between inertial measurement unit-derived ‘force signatures’ and ground reaction forces during cricket pace bowling | |
| Baroudi et al. | Estimating walking speed in the wild | |
| Young et al. | Just find it: The Mymo approach to recommend running shoes | |
| Kim et al. | Assessing physical abilities of sarcopenia patients using gait analysis and smart insole for development of digital biomarker | |
| Donahue et al. | Estimation of gait events and kinetic waveforms with wearable sensors and machine learning when running in an unconstrained environment | |
| Garcia-Pinillos et al. | Influence of RunScribe™ placement on the accuracy of spatiotemporal gait characteristics during running | |
| Pohl et al. | Classification of functional and non-functional arm use by inertial measurement units in individuals with upper limb impairment after stroke | |
| Mason et al. | Wearables for running gait analysis: A study protocol | |
| Kozinc et al. | The reliability of wearable commercial sensors for outdoor assessment of running biomechanics: the effect of surface and running speed | |
| Mason et al. | Validity and reliability of the DANU sports system for walking and running gait assessment | |
| Worsey et al. | Automatic classification of running surfaces using an ankle-worn inertial sensor | |
| Kenneally-Dabrowski et al. | Are accelerometers a valid tool for measuring overground sprinting symmetry? | |
| Muzaffar et al. | Self-synchronized, continuous body weight monitoring using flexible force sensors and ground reaction force signal processing | |
| Patoz et al. | Comparison of different machine learning models to enhance sacral acceleration-based estimations of running stride temporal variables and peak vertical ground reaction force | |
| Baker et al. | Predicting overstriding with wearable IMUs during treadmill and overground running | |
| Zignoli et al. | Indoor running temporal variability for different running speeds, treadmill inclinations, and three different estimation strategies | |
| Kamnardsiri et al. | Computer vision-based instantaneous speed tracking system for measuring the subtask speed in the 100-meter sprinter: Development and concurrent validity study | |
| Patoz et al. | Examination of running pattern consistency across speeds |