[go: up one dir, main page]

Lien et al., 2022 - Google Patents

On preventing attention capture: Is singleton suppression actually singleton suppression?

Lien et al., 2022

Document ID
12116529380501991475
Author
Lien M
Ruthruff E
Hauck C
Publication year
Publication venue
Psychological research

External Links

Snippet

It is commonly assumed that salient singletons generate an “attend-to-me signal” which causes suppression to develop over time, eventually preventing capture. Despite this assumption and the name “singleton suppression,” a causal link between salience and …
Continue reading at link.springer.com (other versions)

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
    • G09B7/00—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers
    • G09B7/02—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers of the type wherein the student is expected to construct an answer to the question which is presented or wherein the machine gives an answer to the question presented by a student
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
    • G09B5/00—Electrically-operated educational appliances
    • G09B5/02—Electrically-operated educational appliances with visual presentation of the material to be studied, e.g. using film strip
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
    • G09B7/00—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers
    • G09B7/06—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers of the multiple-choice answer-type, i.e. where a given question is provided with a series of answers and a choice has to be made from the answers
    • G09B7/07—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers of the multiple-choice answer-type, i.e. where a given question is provided with a series of answers and a choice has to be made from the answers providing for individual presentation of questions to a plurality of student stations
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
    • G09B5/00—Electrically-operated educational appliances
    • G09B5/06—Electrically-operated educational appliances with both visual and audible presentation of the material to be studied
    • G09B5/065—Combinations of audio and video presentations, e.g. videotapes, videodiscs, television systems
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F3/00—Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
    • G06F3/01—Input arrangements or combined input and output arrangements for interaction between user and computer
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00—Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02—Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • G06Q30/0202—Market predictions or demand forecasting
    • G06Q30/0203—Market surveys or market polls
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for a specific business sector, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10—Services
    • G06Q50/20—Education
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
    • G09B19/00—Teaching not covered by other main groups of this subclass
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06K—RECOGNITION OF DATA; PRESENTATION OF DATA; RECORD CARRIERS; HANDLING RECORD CARRIERS
    • G06K9/00—Methods or arrangements for reading or recognising printed or written characters or for recognising patterns, e.g. fingerprints

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Lien et al. On preventing attention capture: Is singleton suppression actually singleton suppression?
Sturm Decreasing unethical decisions: The role of morality-based individual differences
Müller et al. Locus of dimension weighting: Preattentive or postselective?
Slattery et al. The influence of text legibility on eye movements during reading
Hennessee et al. The effects of value on context-item associative memory in younger and older adults.
LaPointe et al. Semantically incongruent objects attract eye gaze when viewing scenes for change
Nothdurft Salience and target selection in visual search
Normand et al. Does evaluative pressure make you less or more distractible? Role of top-down attentional control over response selection.
Wall et al. Identifying relationships between cognitive processes across tasks, contexts, and time
Sarmiento et al. Audiovisual interactions depend on context of congruency
Rajsic et al. Learned value and object perception: Accelerated perception or biased decisions?
Ramezani et al. The effectiveness of a ToM training program in promoting empathy between married couples
Meinhardt-Injac et al. Holistic face perception in young and older adults: effects of feedback and attentional demand
Jun et al. Perceptual and response factors in the gradual onset continuous performance tasks
Rizzo et al. Change blindness, aging, and cognition
Barnes et al. Neural coding of visual objects rapidly reconfigures to reflect subtrial shifts in attentional focus
Riccardi Perceptual presence: An attentional account
Kondyli et al. How do drivers mitigate the effects of naturalistic visual complexity? On attentional strategies and their implications under a change blindness protocol
Vida et al. The influences of face inversion and facial expression on sensitivity to eye contact in high-functioning adults with autism spectrum disorders
Bowden et al. Improving prospective memory with contextual cueing
Stahl et al. Evaluative conditioning of pattern-masked nonwords requires perceptual awareness.
Stanković et al. Task-irrelevant valence-preferred colors boost visual search for a singleton-shape target
Pickel et al. The transfer of location-based control requires location-based conflict
Lleras et al. Can we “apply” the findings of Forster and Lavie (2008)? On the generalizability of attentional capture effects under varying levels of perceptual load.
Barber et al. Age-differences in interpreting the valence of ambiguous facial expressions: evidence for multiple contributing processes