Short et al., 2018 - Google Patents
Conceptual design of sacrificial sub-systems: failure flow decision functionsShort et al., 2018
View DOC- Document ID
- 16764063685206397711
- Author
- Short A
- Lai A
- Van Bossuyt D
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Research in Engineering Design
External Links
Snippet
This paper presents a method to conceptually model sacrificing non-critical sub-systems, or components, in a failure scenario to protect critical system functionality through a functional failure modeling technique. Understanding the potential benefits and drawbacks of choosing …
- 238000000034 method 0 abstract description 33
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/50—Computer-aided design
- G06F17/5009—Computer-aided design using simulation
- G06F17/5018—Computer-aided design using simulation using finite difference methods or finite element methods
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
- G06Q10/063—Operations research or analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTER SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N5/00—Computer systems utilising knowledge based models
- G06N5/02—Knowledge representation
- G06N5/022—Knowledge engineering, knowledge acquisition
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/07—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring responding to the occurence of a fault, e.g. fault tolerance
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTER SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N99/00—Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
- G06N99/005—Learning machines, i.e. computer in which a programme is changed according to experience gained by the machine itself during a complete run
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/04—Forecasting or optimisation, e.g. linear programming, "travelling salesman problem" or "cutting stock problem"
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTER SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N3/00—Computer systems based on biological models
- G06N3/02—Computer systems based on biological models using neural network models
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B17/00—Systems involving the use of models or simulators of said systems
- G05B17/02—Systems involving the use of models or simulators of said systems electric
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2217/00—Indexing scheme relating to computer aided design [CAD]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
- G05B2219/30—Nc systems
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B23/00—Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
- G05B23/02—Electric testing or monitoring
- G05B23/0205—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
- G05B23/0218—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults
- G05B23/0243—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults model based detection method, e.g. first-principles knowledge model
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Short et al. | Conceptual design of sacrificial sub-systems: failure flow decision functions | |
| Liu et al. | Algorithms for verifying deep neural networks | |
| Clarkson et al. | Predicting change propagation in complex design | |
| Otto et al. | Global views on modular design research: linking alternative methods to support modular product family concept development | |
| Humphreys et al. | Advancing fusion with machine learning research needs workshop report | |
| Guariniello et al. | Supporting design via the system operational dependency analysis methodology | |
| Kurtoglu et al. | A functional failure reasoning methodology for evaluation of conceptual system architectures | |
| Collopy et al. | Value-driven design | |
| Moullec et al. | Toward system architecture generation and performances assessment under uncertainty using Bayesian networks | |
| Hulse et al. | Quantifying the resilience-informed scenario cost sum: A value-driven design approach for functional hazard assessment | |
| Staack et al. | A holistic engineering approach to aeronautical product development | |
| Ahmad et al. | Towards formal fault tree analysis using theorem proving | |
| Saxena et al. | Requirements specification for prognostics performance-an overview | |
| Lu et al. | An Investigation of Functionalities of Future Tool‐chain for Aerospace Industry | |
| Abeywickrama et al. | AERoS: assurance of emergent behaviour in autonomous robotic swarms | |
| Dabney et al. | Trustworthy autonomy for gateway vehicle system manager | |
| Selva et al. | A rule-based method for scalable and traceable evaluation of system architectures | |
| Alonso Fernández et al. | Modeling technical risk propagation using field-effects in automotive technology infusion design studies | |
| Arlitt et al. | A generative human-in-the-loop approach for conceptual design exploration using flow failure frequency in functional models | |
| Perez | Application of MBSE to risk-informed design methods for space mission applications | |
| Hulse et al. | Synthetic fault mode generation for resilience analysis and failure mechanism discovery | |
| Kaur | System Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability | |
| Rizzo et al. | Use of Bayesian networks for qualification planning: a predictive analysis framework for a technically complex systems engineering problem | |
| Hulse | A computational framework for resilience-informed design | |
| Madni | Affordable resilience |