[go: up one dir, main page]

Perez et al., 2013 - Google Patents

Cues for scent intensification in debugging

Perez et al., 2013

View PDF
Document ID
17241331280458017250
Author
Perez A
Abreu R
Publication year
Publication venue
2013 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)

External Links

Snippet

Information foraging is a theory to understand how people search for information. In this theory, information scent is the perceived likelihood by the “predator” that a cue will lead to a “prey”. The better the cues, the better the information scent. In automatic debugging, it is the …
Continue reading at repositorio.inesctec.pt (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/36Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
    • G06F11/3668Software testing
    • G06F11/3672Test management
    • G06F11/3676Test management for coverage analysis
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/36Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
    • G06F11/3668Software testing
    • G06F11/3672Test management
    • G06F11/3688Test management for test execution, e.g. scheduling of test suites
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/36Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
    • G06F11/3604Software analysis for verifying properties of programs
    • G06F11/3608Software analysis for verifying properties of programs using formal methods, e.g. model checking, abstract interpretation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/36Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
    • G06F11/3604Software analysis for verifying properties of programs
    • G06F11/3612Software analysis for verifying properties of programs by runtime analysis
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/36Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
    • G06F11/3668Software testing
    • G06F11/3696Methods or tools to render software testable
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/36Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
    • G06F11/362Software debugging
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/07Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring responding to the occurence of a fault, e.g. fault tolerance
    • G06F11/0703Error or fault processing not based on redundancy, i.e. by taking additional measures to deal with the error or fault not making use of redundancy in operation, in hardware, or in data representation
    • G06F11/0706Error or fault processing not based on redundancy, i.e. by taking additional measures to deal with the error or fault not making use of redundancy in operation, in hardware, or in data representation the processing taking place on a specific hardware platform or in a specific software environment
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/50Computer-aided design
    • G06F17/5009Computer-aided design using simulation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/36Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
    • G06F11/3664Environments for testing or debugging software
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F8/00Arrangements for software engineering
    • G06F8/30Creation or generation of source code
    • G06F8/34Graphical or visual programming
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F8/00Arrangements for software engineering
    • G06F8/70Software maintenance or management
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06NCOMPUTER SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    • G06N5/00Computer systems utilising knowledge based models
    • G06N5/02Knowledge representation
    • G06N5/022Knowledge engineering, knowledge acquisition
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/22Detection or location of defective computer hardware by testing during standby operation or during idle time, e.g. start-up testing
    • G06F11/2257Detection or location of defective computer hardware by testing during standby operation or during idle time, e.g. start-up testing using expert systems
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/30Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Gouveia et al. Using HTML5 visualizations in software fault localization
Ko et al. Designing the whyline: a debugging interface for asking questions about program behavior
de Souza et al. Spectrum-based software fault localization: A survey of techniques, advances, and challenges
Daka et al. Modeling readability to improve unit tests
Campos et al. Gzoltar: an eclipse plug-in for testing and debugging
Korel PELAS-program error-locating assistant system
Deransart et al. Analysis and visualization tools for constraint programming: constraint debugging
Ang et al. Revisiting the practical use of automated software fault localization techniques
Wong et al. Software fault localization: An overview of research, techniques, and tools
Singh et al. A formal approach to rigorous development of critical systems
Perez et al. Cues for scent intensification in debugging
Ferrari et al. On transforming model‐based tests into code: A systematic literature review
Predoaia et al. Tree-based versus hybrid graphical-textual model editors: An empirical study of testing specifications
Perez et al. Framing program comprehension as fault localization
Zhu et al. A systematic literature review of how mutation testing supports test activities
Abreu The bumpy road of taking automated debugging to industry
Goldstein et al. Structured planning and debugging: a linguistic theory of design
Li et al. A requirements inspection method based on scenarios generated by model mutation and the experimental validation
Perez Dynamic code coverage with progressive detail levels
Ko Debugging by asking questions about program output
ABDALLAH A Weighted Grid for Measuring Program Robustness
Zeller Causes and effects in computer programs
Ceballos et al. Model-based software debugging
Mehrpour et al. Programming tools for working with design decisions in code
Hierons et al. Mutation testing for robochart