[go: up one dir, main page]

Franklin Jr et al., 2005 - Google Patents

Safety and efficacy of the use of bioabsorbable seamguard in colorectal surgery at the Texas endosurgery institute

Franklin Jr et al., 2005

Document ID
2328088598019552559
Author
Franklin Jr M
Berghoff K
Arellano P
Trevino J
Abrego-Medina D
Publication year
Publication venue
Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques

External Links

Snippet

Bioabsorbable Seamguard (BSG) is a random-fiber web of polyglycolic acid/trimethylene carbonate. It is completely absorbed within 6 months or less due to its constitution of a bioabsorbable membrane with polyester braided suture. It has been used in obesity surgery …
Continue reading at journals.lww.com (other versions)

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/04—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets for suturing wounds; Holders or packages for needles or suture materials
    • A61B17/06—Needles ; Sutures; Needle-suture combinations; Holders or packages for needles or suture materials
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/11—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets for performing anastomosis; Buttons for anastomosis
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/12—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets for ligaturing or otherwise compressing tubular parts of the body, e.g. blood vessels, umbilical cord
    • A61B17/12009—Implements for ligaturing other than by clamps or clips, e.g. using a loop with a slip knot
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/00234—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets for minimally invasive surgery
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/04—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets for suturing wounds; Holders or packages for needles or suture materials
    • A61B17/0469—Suturing instruments for use in minimally invasive surgery, e.g. endoscopic surgery
    • A61B2017/0475—Suturing instruments for use in minimally invasive surgery, e.g. endoscopic surgery using sutures having a slip knot
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B2017/00743—Type of operation; Specification of treatment sites
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/064—Surgical staples, i.e. penetrating the tissue
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B18/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods for transferring non-mechanical forms of energy to or from the body

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Franklin Jr et al. Safety and efficacy of the use of bioabsorbable seamguard in colorectal surgery at the Texas endosurgery institute
Banerjee et al. Endoscopic closure devices
Manta et al. Endoscopic treatment of gastrointestinal fistulas using an over-the-scope clip (OTSC) device: case series from a tertiary referral center
Luján et al. Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass in the treatment of morbid obesity: a randomized prospective study
Fan et al. Biliary reconstruction and complications of right lobe live donor liver transplantation
Holcomb III et al. Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula: a multi-institutional analysis
Lacy et al. Revisional surgery after sleeve gastrectomy
Ryou et al. Transluminal closure for NOTES: an ex vivo study comparing leak pressures of various gastrotomy and colotomy closure modalities
Kim et al. Reconstruction of esophagojejunostomies using endoscopic linear staplers in totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy: report of 139 cases in a large-volume center
Esen et al. Totally robotic versus totally laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer
Palanivelu et al. Review of various liver retraction techniques in single incision laparoscopic surgery for the exposure of hiatus
Man et al. Anastomotic technique—How to optimize success and minimize leak rates
Kim Laparoscopic surgery for perforated duodenal ulcer disease: analysis of 70 consecutive cases from a single surgeon
Miura et al. Esophagojejunostomy with linear staplers in laparoscopic total gastrectomy: experience with 168 cases in 5 consecutive years
Tanimura et al. Intracorporeal Billroth 1 reconstruction by triangulating stapling technique after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer
Chowbey et al. Elective laparoscopy in diagnosis and treatment of recurrent small bowel obstruction
Srikanth et al. Single incision laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy for neuroendocrine tumor of the tail of pancreas
Di Lorenzo et al. Bariatric reduction system–BARS: device, technique and first clinical experience
Ahn et al. Surgical clips found at the hepatic duct after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a possible case of clip migration
Tang et al. Clinical application of “Double R” anastomosis technique in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy procedure
Kim et al. The applicability of laparoscopic gastrectomy in the surgical treatment of giant duodenal ulcer perforation
Tsao et al. Adequate venous drainage: the most critical factor for a successful free jejunal transfer
Siow et al. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers: the sutured omental patch and focused sequential lavage technique
Kim et al. Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with an intracorporeal gastroduodenostomy using a circular stapler
Levitzky et al. Endoscopic management in the bariatric surgical patient