[go: up one dir, main page]

MARGASON et al., 1985 - Google Patents

Subsonic panel methods-a comparison of several production codes

MARGASON et al., 1985

Document ID
285367345836678719
Author
MARGASON R
KJELGAARD S
SELLERS, III W
MORRIS, JR C
WALKEY K
Shields E
Publication year
Publication venue
23rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting

External Links

Snippet

The purpose of this paper is to assess the capability of five production surface panel methods to predict the subsonic characteristics of a series of configurations. The surface panel methods were the HESS, VSAERO, QUADPAN, MCAERO and PAN AIR codes. Three …
Continue reading at arc.aiaa.org (other versions)

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/50—Computer-aided design
    • G06F17/5009—Computer-aided design using simulation
    • G06F17/5018—Computer-aided design using simulation using finite difference methods or finite element methods
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02T—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
    • Y02T50/00—Aeronautics or air transport
    • Y02T50/10—Drag reduction

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
MARGASON et al. Subsonic panel methods-a comparison of several production codes
Maskew Prediction of subsonic aerodynamic characteristics: a case for low-order panel methods
Erickson Panel methods: An introduction
Burdette et al. Performance evaluation of a morphing trailing edge using multipoint aerostructural design optimization
Phillips et al. Predicting maximum lift coefficient for twisted wings using lifting-line theory
Smith et al. Computation of induced drag for elliptical and crescent-shaped wings
Suciu et al. Nonlinear steady incompressible lifting-surface analysis with wake roll-up
Bilanin et al. Estimation of velocities and roll-up in aircraft vortex wakes
Mendenhall et al. Effect of symmetrical vortex shedding on the longitudinal aerodynamic characteristics of wing-body-tail combinations
Epstein et al. Multigrid Euler solver about arbitrary aircraft configurations with Cartesian grids and local refinement
MORTARA et al. A method for the prediction of induced drag for planar and nonplanarwings
Henne et al. Wing analysis using a transonic potential flow computational method
Phillips et al. Estimating the subsonic aerodynamic center and moment components for swept wings
Moorthamers et al. Accuracy of Küchemann's Prediction for the Locus of Aerodynamic Centers on Swept Wings
Thomas et al. Evaluation of factors determining the accuracy of linearized subsonic panel methods
Moorthamers et al. Aerodynamic center at the root of swept, elliptic wings in inviscid flow
Epps et al. A quasi-continuous vortex lattice method for unsteady aerodynamics analysis
Arslan et al. Integrated determination of sensitivity derivatives for an aeroelastic transonic wing
Filotas Approximate transfer functions for large aspect ratio wings in turbulent flow
Boppe et al. Stars & Stripes' 87; Computational Flow Simulations for Hydrodynamic Design
Church et al. Lifting-Line Predictions for Lift and Twist Distributions to Minimize Induced Drag in Ground Effect
Van Dam et al. Calculation and measurement of induced drag at low speeds
Han et al. Optimization of bluff-body rear-end shape for minimum drag in groundproximity
MASON Wing-canard aerodynamics at transonic speeds-Fundamental considerations on minimum drag spanloads
KJELGAARD Evaluation of a surface panel method coupled with several boundary layer analyses