[go: up one dir, main page]

Sikder, 2025 - Google Patents

Fused filament fabrication of patient-specific multifunctional implants for orthopedics

Sikder, 2025

Document ID
3098506475387612261
Author
Sikder P
Publication year
Publication venue
Advances in 3D and 4D Printing of Medical Robots and Devices

External Links

Snippet

Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is one of the most well-known high-performance polymers in the biomaterials industry for developing implants requiring high strength and durability. PEEK's impressive strength and durability, combined with its favorable biocompatibility and …
Continue reading at www.sciencedirect.com (other versions)

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, E.G. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/02—Prostheses implantable into the body
    • A61F2/30—Joints
    • A61F2/3094—Designing or manufacturing processes
    • A61F2/30942—Designing or manufacturing processes for designing or making customized prostheses, e.g. using templates, CT or NMR scans, finite-element analysis or CAD-CAM techniques
    • A61F2002/30952—Designing or manufacturing processes for designing or making customized prostheses, e.g. using templates, CT or NMR scans, finite-element analysis or CAD-CAM techniques using CAD-CAM techniques or NC-techniques
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, E.G. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/02—Prostheses implantable into the body
    • A61F2/30—Joints
    • A61F2/3094—Designing or manufacturing processes
    • A61F2002/3097—Designing or manufacturing processes using laser

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Attarilar et al. 3D printing technologies in metallic implants: a thematic review on the techniques and procedures
Calignano et al. Design of additively manufactured structures for biomedical applications: a review of the additive manufacturing processes applied to the biomedical sector
Honigmann et al. Patient‐specific surgical implants made of 3D printed PEEK: material, technology, and scope of surgical application
Limaye et al. Assessing biocompatibility & mechanical testing of 3D-printed PEEK versus milled PEEK
Gleadall et al. Review of additive manufactured tissue engineering scaffolds: relationship between geometry and performance
Sonaye et al. Patient-specific 3D printed Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) dental implant system
Ferrage et al. A review of the additive manufacturing (3DP) of bioceramics: Alumina, zirconia (PSZ) and hydroxyapatite
Petrovskaya et al. 3D printed biocompatible polylactide-hydroxyapatite based material for bone implants
Chang et al. 3D printing bioceramic porous scaffolds with good mechanical property and cell affinity
Caulfield et al. Dependence of mechanical properties of polyamide components on build parameters in the SLS process
Rodriguez Colon et al. The presence of 3D printing in orthopedics: A clinical and material review
Jeyachandran et al. Mechanical behaviour of additively manufactured bioactive glass/high density polyethylene composites
Bagudanch et al. Customized cranial implant manufactured by incremental sheet forming using a biocompatible polymer
Thieringer et al. Patient specific implants from a 3D printer–an innovative manufacturing process for custom PEEK implants in cranio-maxillofacial surgery
Shaikh et al. Revolutionising orthopaedic implants—a comprehensive review on metal 3D printing with materials, design strategies, manufacturing technologies, and post-process machining advancements
Molinar-Díaz et al. Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) biomaterials and composites: challenges, progress, and opportunities
Sikder Fused filament fabrication of patient-specific multifunctional implants for orthopedics
Sankar et al. Fused filament fabricated PEEK based polymer composites for orthopaedic implants: a review
Sonaye et al. A comprehensive analysis of high-temperature material extrusion 3D printing parameters on fracture patterns and strength of polyetheretherketone cranial implants
Bose et al. 3D Printing of Bone Implants and Replacements: Careful tailoring of the chemistry and structure of biomaterials is leading to the production of devices that can help repair or replace damaged tissue
Sahal et al. 3DP materials and methods for orthopedic, dental and maxillofacial implants: a brief comparative report
Pisaneschi Numerical and experimental exploration of patient-specific cranial implants with 3D-printed PEKK via Arburg Plastic Freeforming
Husain et al. On process capability of single screw extruder for fabricating PVDF composite matrix
Das et al. Metal 3D printing of biometals for prostheses and implants: a review
Sultan et al. Optimization of PETG 3D printing parameters for the design and development of biocompatible bone implants