Wegmüller et al., 2021 - Google Patents
Consumer vs. high-end 3D printers for guided implant surgery—an in vitro accuracy assessment study of different 3D printing technologiesWegmüller et al., 2021
View HTML- Document ID
- 3633703496526764259
- Author
- Wegmüller L
- Halbeisen F
- Sharma N
- Kühl S
- Thieringer F
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Journal of clinical medicine
External Links
Snippet
This study evaluates the accuracy of drill guides fabricated in medical-grade, biocompatible materials for static, computer-aided implant surgery (sCAIS). The virtually planned drill guides of ten completed patient cases were printed (n= 40) using professional (Material …
- 239000007943 implant 0 title abstract description 67
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for a specific business sector, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/22—Health care, e.g. hospitals; Social work
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
- G06F19/34—Computer-assisted medical diagnosis or treatment, e.g. computerised prescription or delivery of medication or diets, computerised local control of medical devices, medical expert systems or telemedicine
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
- G06F19/32—Medical data management, e.g. systems or protocols for archival or communication of medical images, computerised patient records or computerised general medical references
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Wegmüller et al. | Consumer vs. high-end 3D printers for guided implant surgery—an in vitro accuracy assessment study of different 3D printing technologies | |
| Sharma et al. | Effects of steam sterilization on 3D printed biocompatible resin materials for surgical guides—an accuracy assessment study | |
| Park et al. | Flexural strength of 3D-printing resin materials for provisional fixed dental prostheses | |
| Msallem et al. | Evaluation of the dimensional accuracy of 3D-printed anatomical mandibular models using FFF, SLA, SLS, MJ, and BJ printing technology | |
| Schnutenhaus et al. | Accuracy of dynamic computer-assisted implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and in vitro studies | |
| Yoo et al. | Dimensional accuracy of dental models for three-unit prostheses fabricated by various 3D printing technologies | |
| Chamo et al. | Accuracy assessment of molded, patient-specific polymethylmethacrylate craniofacial implants compared to their 3D printed originals | |
| Pieralli et al. | How accurate is oral implant installation using surgical guides printed from a degradable and steam-sterilized biopolymer? | |
| Scribante et al. | Properties of CAD/CAM 3D printing dental materials and their clinical applications in orthodontics: where are we now? | |
| Czajkowska et al. | Comparison of dental stone models and their 3D printed acrylic replicas for the accuracy and mechanical properties | |
| Lo Russo et al. | Effect of fabrication technology on the accuracy of surgical guides for dental-implant surgery | |
| Patzelt et al. | In vitro time efficiency, fit, and wear of conventionally-versus digitally-fabricated occlusal splints | |
| Paradowska-Stolarz et al. | Comparison of the compression and tensile modulus of two chosen resins used in dentistry for 3D printing | |
| Tanveer et al. | Systematic review of clinical applications of CAD/CAM technology for craniofacial implants placement and manufacturing of orbital prostheses | |
| Pop et al. | Effects of disinfection and steam sterilization on the mechanical properties of 3D SLA-and DLP-printed surgical guides for orthodontic implant placement | |
| Oh et al. | In vitro comparison between metal sleeve-free and metal sleeve-incorporated 3D-printed computer-assisted implant surgical guides | |
| Chen et al. | Accuracy of full-guided and half-guided surgical templates in anterior immediate and delayed implantation: a retrospective study | |
| Oh et al. | Influence of scanning-aid materials on the accuracy and time efficiency of intraoral scanners for full-arch digital scanning: an in vitro study | |
| Anunmana et al. | In vitro comparison of surgical implant placement accuracy using guides fabricated by three different additive technologies | |
| Im et al. | Assessment of compatibility between various intraoral scanners and 3D printers through an accuracy analysis of 3D printed models | |
| Aretxabaleta et al. | Accuracy evaluation of additively and subtractively fabricated palatal plate orthodontic appliances for newborns and infants–an in vitro study | |
| Lo Russo et al. | Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Surgical guides for Static Computer-aided Implant surgery: a systematic review | |
| Lim et al. | Effects of groove sealing of the posterior occlusal surface and offset of the internal surface on the internal fit and accuracy of implant placements using 3D-printed surgical guides: an in vitro study | |
| D’haese et al. | Accuracy of guided implant surgery in the edentulous jaw using desktop 3D-printed mucosal supported guides | |
| Schnutenhaus et al. | Accuracy of computer-assisted dynamic navigation as a function of different intraoral reference systems: An in vitro study |