CN109374452B - A method and testing device for characterization of fatigue damage status of prestressed concrete beams - Google Patents
A method and testing device for characterization of fatigue damage status of prestressed concrete beams Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN109374452B CN109374452B CN201811440739.9A CN201811440739A CN109374452B CN 109374452 B CN109374452 B CN 109374452B CN 201811440739 A CN201811440739 A CN 201811440739A CN 109374452 B CN109374452 B CN 109374452B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- prestressed concrete
- concrete beam
- fatigue
- tested
- test
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 239000011513 prestressed concrete Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 120
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 81
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 37
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 9
- 238000009661 fatigue test Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 28
- 238000011068 loading method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 21
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 claims description 30
- 230000005284 excitation Effects 0.000 claims description 22
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 abstract description 14
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 12
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 abstract description 7
- 206010016256 fatigue Diseases 0.000 description 91
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 11
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 10
- 239000004567 concrete Substances 0.000 description 9
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 9
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 8
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 7
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 7
- 230000001186 cumulative effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004568 cement Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003638 chemical reducing agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002427 irreversible effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011056 performance test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013001 point bending Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004379 similarity theory Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004575 stone Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000002435 tendon Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N3/00—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
- G01N3/32—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress by applying repeated or pulsating forces
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N29/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
- G01N29/04—Analysing solids
- G01N29/045—Analysing solids by imparting shocks to the workpiece and detecting the vibrations or the acoustic waves caused by the shocks
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2203/00—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
- G01N2203/0001—Type of application of the stress
- G01N2203/0005—Repeated or cyclic
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2203/00—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
- G01N2203/0058—Kind of property studied
- G01N2203/0069—Fatigue, creep, strain-stress relations or elastic constants
- G01N2203/0073—Fatigue
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
- Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)
Abstract
Description
技术领域Technical field
本发明属于工程结构疲劳损伤测试技术领域,尤其涉及一种预应力混凝土梁疲劳损伤状态表征方法及测试装置。The invention belongs to the technical field of fatigue damage testing of engineering structures, and in particular relates to a fatigue damage state characterization method and testing device for prestressed concrete beams.
背景技术Background technique
预应力混凝土梁广泛应用于公路铁路桥梁等土木大跨度工程结构中。这一类预应力混凝土梁在设计使用年限内将长期承受车辆疲劳荷载的反复作用。疲劳荷载作用将引起结构疲劳损伤的发生和发展,随着损伤的累积将影响结构的正常使用性能甚至危及结构的安全性。因此,预应力混凝土梁的疲劳性能,引起了国内外许多学者和工程技术人员的普遍关注。Prestressed concrete beams are widely used in long-span civil engineering structures such as highways and railway bridges. This type of prestressed concrete beam will withstand repeated vehicle fatigue loads for a long time during its design service life. Fatigue load will cause the occurrence and development of structural fatigue damage. As the damage accumulates, it will affect the normal performance of the structure and even endanger the safety of the structure. Therefore, the fatigue performance of prestressed concrete beams has attracted widespread attention from many scholars and engineering technicians at home and abroad.
传统的预应力混凝土梁疲劳性能试验中,通常采用脉动式疲劳试验机施加等幅疲劳荷载,在疲劳加载历程中的典型时刻,停机开展静力加卸载实验,从而根据预应力混凝土梁的挠度、应力和应变等静力特性推测预应力混凝土梁疲劳损伤发展过程。这些方法切入点较为单一,不能反映疲劳动力荷载作用下结构的受力特点,难以揭示预应力混凝土梁疲劳损伤的发展过程和疲劳破坏机理,亟需研究开发新的基于动力学测试手段研究预应力混凝土梁疲劳问题的新方法。In the traditional fatigue performance test of prestressed concrete beams, a pulsating fatigue testing machine is usually used to apply constant amplitude fatigue loads. At typical moments in the fatigue loading process, the machine is stopped to carry out static loading and unloading experiments, so as to determine the deflection, Stress and strain isostatic properties infer the fatigue damage development process of prestressed concrete beams. These methods have a single entry point and cannot reflect the stress characteristics of the structure under fatigue dynamic loads. It is difficult to reveal the development process and fatigue failure mechanism of fatigue damage of prestressed concrete beams. It is urgent to research and develop new dynamic testing methods to study prestressing. A new approach to fatigue problems in concrete beams.
发明内容Contents of the invention
本发明所要解决的第一个技术问题在于提供一种基于模态参数的预应力混凝土梁疲劳损伤状态表征方法。The first technical problem to be solved by the present invention is to provide a method for characterizing the fatigue damage state of prestressed concrete beams based on modal parameters.
本发明所要解决的第二个技术问题在于提供一种实现上述疲劳损伤状态表征方法的测试装置。The second technical problem to be solved by the present invention is to provide a testing device that implements the above fatigue damage state characterization method.
为解决上述第一个技术问题,本发明采用如下技术方案:In order to solve the above-mentioned first technical problem, the present invention adopts the following technical solutions:
一种预应力混凝土梁疲劳损伤状态表征方法,其特征在于,包括如下步骤:A method for characterizing the fatigue damage state of prestressed concrete beams, which is characterized by including the following steps:
步骤1:将待测预应力混凝土梁放置于两个简支支座上,首先对初始完好待测预应力混凝土梁进行动力测试,得到待测预应力混凝土梁的初始模态频率w0;Step 1: Place the prestressed concrete beam to be tested on two simply supported supports. First, perform a dynamic test on the initial intact prestressed concrete beam to be tested, and obtain the initial modal frequency w 0 of the prestressed concrete beam to be tested;
步骤2:开启疲劳试验机对待测预应力混凝土梁进行疲劳试验,疲劳循环一定次数后停机进行动力测试,得到疲劳循环次数为n万次时待测预应力混凝土梁的模态频率wn;Step 2: Turn on the fatigue testing machine to perform a fatigue test on the prestressed concrete beam to be tested. After a certain number of fatigue cycles, stop the machine for dynamic testing. Obtain the modal frequency w n of the prestressed concrete beam to be tested when the number of fatigue cycles is n million times;
步骤3:根据如下公式得到不同循环次数下待测预应力混凝土梁的损伤变量:Step 3: Obtain the damage variables of the prestressed concrete beam to be measured under different number of cycles according to the following formula:
其中:w0为初始模态频率,wN为待测预应力混凝土梁疲劳破坏时的模态频率,N为待测预应力混凝土梁疲劳破坏时的循环次数;Among them: w 0 is the initial modal frequency, w N is the modal frequency when the prestressed concrete beam is tested for fatigue failure, and N is the number of cycles when the prestressed concrete beam is tested for fatigue failure;
步骤4:对步骤3得到的不同循环次数下待测预应力混凝土梁的损伤变量进行拟合,得到基于模态频率的疲劳全过程损伤变量演化规律,由此表征待测预应力混凝土梁疲劳损伤状态。Step 4: Fit the damage variables of the prestressed concrete beam to be tested under different number of cycles obtained in step 3, and obtain the evolution law of damage variables in the entire fatigue process based on modal frequency, thereby characterizing the fatigue damage of the prestressed concrete beam to be tested. state.
进一步的,损伤变量与循环次数采用如下公式进行拟合:Furthermore, the damage variables and cycle times are fitted using the following formula:
其中:α,β为待拟合参数,n为循环次数,N为待测预应力混凝土梁疲劳破坏时的循环次数。Among them: α, β are the parameters to be fitted, n is the number of cycles, and N is the number of cycles when the fatigue failure of the prestressed concrete beam is to be measured.
进一步的,动力测试采用激振法,通过移动激振器至待测预应力混凝土梁各阶理论振型幅值最大幅值点附近进行扫频激振,通过拾振器采集加速度信号后传递至模态测试分析系统进行模态分析。Further, the dynamic test adopts the vibration excitation method. By moving the vibration exciter to the maximum amplitude point of the theoretical vibration shape of each order of the prestressed concrete beam to be tested, frequency sweep is performed to excite the vibration. The acceleration signal is collected through the vibration pickup and then transmitted to The modal testing and analysis system performs modal analysis.
进一步的,所述以模态频率定义的损伤变量选取第一阶模态频率。Further, the first-order modal frequency is selected as the damage variable defined by modal frequency.
进一步的,动力测试时,激振器与拾振器错开设置。Furthermore, during the dynamic test, the vibrator and vibration pickup were staggered.
为解决上述第二个技术问题,本发明采用如下技术方案:In order to solve the above-mentioned second technical problem, the present invention adopts the following technical solutions:
一种实现权上述表征方法的测试装置,包括相对设置在地面上的两个简支支座、设置在两个简支支座上的待测预应力混凝土梁、激振系统以及模态测试分析系统;A testing device that implements the above characterization method, including two simply supported supports set relatively on the ground, a prestressed concrete beam to be tested set on the two simply supported supports, an excitation system and a modal test analysis system;
所述激振系统包括顺次连接的激振器、功率放大器及信号放大器,激振器可自由移动的设置在待测预应力混凝土梁的下方位于两个简支支座之间;The excitation system includes an exciter, a power amplifier and a signal amplifier connected in sequence. The exciter is freely movable and is located below the prestressed concrete beam to be tested and between two simply supported supports;
所述模态测试分析系统包括顺次连接的拾振器、信号采集系统以及模态分析系统,拾振器布置在待测预应力混凝土梁的顶面。The modal testing and analysis system includes a vibration pickup, a signal acquisition system and a modal analysis system connected in sequence. The vibration pickup is arranged on the top surface of the prestressed concrete beam to be tested.
进一步的,拾振器沿待测预应力混凝土梁长度方向等长布置。Further, the vibration pickups are arranged equally along the length direction of the prestressed concrete beam to be measured.
进一步的,激振器设置在行走小车上。Further, the vibrator is installed on the walking trolley.
进一步的,待测预应力混凝土梁上方设置疲劳试验机,疲劳试验机通过反力架固定安装在地面上,待测预应力混凝土梁的顶部位于疲劳试验机作动头的下方设有荷载分配梁,疲劳试验机的作动头中心点正对着待测预应力混凝土梁中心点和荷载分配梁的中心点。Further, a fatigue testing machine is set above the prestressed concrete beam to be tested. The fatigue testing machine is fixedly installed on the ground through a reaction frame. The top of the prestressed concrete beam to be tested is located below the actuator head of the fatigue testing machine and is provided with a load distribution beam. , the center point of the actuator head of the fatigue testing machine is directly facing the center point of the prestressed concrete beam to be tested and the center point of the load distribution beam.
进一步的,待测预应力混凝土梁的两端上部位于简支支座处、梁跨中位置及荷载加载点底部均设有位移计。Furthermore, displacement meters are installed at the upper parts of both ends of the prestressed concrete beam to be measured at the simply supported supports, at the mid-span position of the beam, and at the bottom of the load loading point.
进一步的,荷载分配梁的两端通过简支支座与待测预应力混凝土梁连接。Further, both ends of the load distribution beam are connected to the prestressed concrete beam to be measured through simply supported supports.
与现有技术相比,本发明具有如下有益效果:Compared with the prior art, the present invention has the following beneficial effects:
1、本发明利用预应力混凝土梁疲劳加载和破坏过程中结构的疲劳损伤状态和模态参数存在良好的映射关系,将预应力混凝土梁结构疲劳试验与动力测试试验相结合,基于振动模态参数分析预应力混凝土梁疲劳损伤的位置及其损伤程度,从而实现了基于模态参数表征预应力混凝土梁疲劳损伤状态,为预应力混凝土梁疲劳性能研究和测试提供了一种新思路。1. The present invention utilizes the good mapping relationship between the fatigue damage state and modal parameters of the structure during the fatigue loading and failure process of prestressed concrete beams, and combines the fatigue test of the prestressed concrete beam structure with the dynamic test test, based on the vibration modal parameters. By analyzing the location and degree of fatigue damage of prestressed concrete beams, the fatigue damage state of prestressed concrete beams can be characterized based on modal parameters, which provides a new idea for the research and testing of fatigue performance of prestressed concrete beams.
2、本发明测试装置将传统固定式激振设备改进为移动式激振设备,可以根据激振点的位置快速运输,使试验的进行更加便捷,具有结构简单、测试方便的优点。2. The test device of the present invention improves the traditional fixed vibration equipment into a mobile vibration equipment, which can be quickly transported according to the location of the vibration point, making the test more convenient, and has the advantages of simple structure and convenient testing.
附图说明Description of the drawings
图1为本发明表征方法的流程图;Figure 1 is a flow chart of the characterization method of the present invention;
图2为本发明动力测试示意图一;Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of the power test of the present invention;
图3为为本发明疲劳试验过程装置示意图一;Figure 3 is a schematic diagram of the device for the fatigue test process of the present invention;
图4为本发明的截面图;Figure 4 is a cross-sectional view of the present invention;
图5为激振位置选取示意图;Figure 5 is a schematic diagram of excitation position selection;
图6为疲劳历程中实测频率退化比曲线;Figure 6 shows the measured frequency degradation ratio curve during the fatigue process;
图7为以一阶模态频率表征的预应力混凝土梁疲劳损伤演化规律图。Figure 7 shows the fatigue damage evolution diagram of prestressed concrete beams characterized by the first-order modal frequency.
具体实施方式Detailed ways
下面将结合本发明实施例中的附图,对本发明实施例中的技术方案进行清楚、完整地描述,显然,所描述的实施例仅仅是本发明一部分实施例,而不是全部的实施例。基于本发明中的实施例,本领域普通技术人员在没有作出创造性劳动前提下所获得的所有其他实施例,都属于本发明保护的范围。The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings in the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some of the embodiments of the present invention, rather than all the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by those of ordinary skill in the art without making creative efforts fall within the scope of protection of the present invention.
参见图1,一种预应力混凝土梁疲劳损伤状态表征方法,包括如下步骤:Referring to Figure 1, a method to characterize the fatigue damage state of prestressed concrete beams includes the following steps:
步骤1:将待测预应力混凝土梁放置于两个简支支座上,首先对初始完好待测预应力混凝土梁进行动力测试,得到待测预应力混凝土梁的初始模态频率w0;Step 1: Place the prestressed concrete beam to be tested on two simply supported supports. First, perform a dynamic test on the initial intact prestressed concrete beam to be tested, and obtain the initial modal frequency w 0 of the prestressed concrete beam to be tested;
步骤2:开启疲劳试验机对待测预应力混凝土梁进行疲劳试验,疲劳循环一定次数后停机进行动力测试,得到疲劳循环次数为n万次时待测预应力混凝土梁的模态频率wn;Step 2: Turn on the fatigue testing machine to perform a fatigue test on the prestressed concrete beam to be tested. After a certain number of fatigue cycles, stop the machine for dynamic testing. Obtain the modal frequency w n of the prestressed concrete beam to be tested when the number of fatigue cycles is n million times;
步骤3:根据如下公式得到不同循环次数下待测预应力混凝土梁的损伤变量:Step 3: Obtain the damage variables of the prestressed concrete beam to be measured under different number of cycles according to the following formula:
其中:w0为初始模态频率,wN为待测预应力混凝土梁疲劳破坏时的模态频率,N为待测预应力混凝土梁疲劳破坏时的循环次数;Among them: w 0 is the initial modal frequency, w N is the modal frequency when the prestressed concrete beam is tested for fatigue failure, and N is the number of cycles when the prestressed concrete beam is tested for fatigue failure;
步骤4:对步骤3得到的不同循环次数下待测预应力混凝土梁的损伤变量进行拟合,得到基于模态频率的疲劳全过程损伤变量演化规律,由此表征待测预应力混凝土梁疲劳损伤状态。Step 4: Fit the damage variables of the prestressed concrete beam to be tested under different number of cycles obtained in step 3, and obtain the evolution law of damage variables in the entire fatigue process based on modal frequency, thereby characterizing the fatigue damage of the prestressed concrete beam to be tested. state.
进一步的,损伤变量与循环次数采用如下公式进行拟合:Furthermore, the damage variables and cycle times are fitted using the following formula:
其中:α,β为待拟合参数,n为循环次数,N为待测预应力混凝土梁疲劳破坏时的循环次数。Among them: α, β are the parameters to be fitted, n is the number of cycles, and N is the number of cycles when the fatigue failure of the prestressed concrete beam is to be measured.
进一步的,动力测试采用激振法,通过移动激振器至待测预应力混凝土梁各阶理论振型幅值最大幅值点附近进行扫频激振,通过拾振器采集加速度信号后传递至模态测试分析系统进行模态分析。Further, the dynamic test adopts the vibration excitation method. By moving the vibration exciter to the maximum amplitude point of the theoretical vibration shape of each order of the prestressed concrete beam to be tested, frequency sweep is performed to excite the vibration. The acceleration signal is collected through the vibration pickup and then transmitted to The modal testing and analysis system performs modal analysis.
进一步的,所述以模态频率定义的损伤变量选取第一阶模态频率。Further, the first-order modal frequency is selected as the damage variable defined by modal frequency.
进一步的,动力测试时,激振器与拾振器错开设置。Furthermore, during the dynamic test, the vibrator and vibration pickup were staggered.
模态测试时,激振位置的选取遵循以下原则:1)将激振器移动至待测梁各阶理论振型幅值最大幅值点附近进行扫频激振;2)所述激振器放置位置应避开拾振器放置位置正下方,以避免该点测得的振动信号因过载而失真。During the modal test, the selection of the excitation position follows the following principles: 1) Move the exciter to the maximum amplitude point of the theoretical vibration shape of each order of the beam to be tested for frequency sweep excitation; 2) The exciter The placement location should avoid being directly below the vibration pickup location to avoid distortion of the vibration signal measured at this point due to overload.
模态测试分析系统选用的模态分析方法为随机子空间SSI法,该方法不用输入外部激励或外部激励不可测,可以有效地从环境激励的结构响应中提取结构模态参数。The modal analysis method selected for the modal test analysis system is the random subspace SSI method. This method does not require the input of external excitations or the external excitations are unmeasurable, and can effectively extract structural modal parameters from the structural response to environmental excitations.
参见图2-图5,一种实现上述表征方法的测试装置,包括相对设置在地面10上的两个简支支座1、设置在两个简支支座1上的待测预应力混凝土梁2、激振系统3以及模态测试分析系统4。Referring to Figures 2 to 5, a testing device for implementing the above characterization method includes two simply supported supports 1 arranged relatively on the ground 10, and a prestressed concrete beam to be tested arranged on the two simply supported supports 1. 2. Excitation system 3 and modal test analysis system 4.
具体的,激振系统3包括激振器301、与激振器301连接的功率放大器302、与功率放大器302连接的信号放大器303,激振器301可自由移动的设置在待测预应力混凝土梁2的下方位于两个简支支座1之间。模态测试分析系统4包括拾振器401、与拾振器401连接的信号采集系统402以及与信号采集系统402连接的模态分析系统403,信号采集系统402连接的模态分析系统403等部件均为现有结构,在此不追赘述。Specifically, the excitation system 3 includes an exciter 301, a power amplifier 302 connected to the exciter 301, and a signal amplifier 303 connected to the power amplifier 302. The exciter 301 is freely movable and arranged on the prestressed concrete beam to be tested. The lower part of 2 is located between two simply supported supports 1. The modal test analysis system 4 includes a vibration pickup 401, a signal acquisition system 402 connected to the vibration pickup 401, a modal analysis system 403 connected to the signal acquisition system 402, a modal analysis system 403 connected to the signal acquisition system 402, and other components. They are all existing structures and will not be described in detail here.
拾振器401布置在待测预应力混凝土梁2的顶面,拾振器401吸附在磁性支座上,磁性支座固定设置在待测预应力混凝土梁2。待测预应力混凝土梁2上方还设有作动头正对待测预应力混凝土梁2的疲劳试验机5,疲劳试验机5通过反力架6固定安装在地面上。The vibration pickup 401 is arranged on the top surface of the prestressed concrete beam 2 to be tested. The vibration pickup 401 is adsorbed on the magnetic support, and the magnetic support is fixedly installed on the prestressed concrete beam 2 to be tested. There is also a fatigue testing machine 5 with an actuator facing the prestressed concrete beam 2 to be tested above the prestressed concrete beam 2 to be tested. The fatigue testing machine 5 is fixedly installed on the ground through a reaction frame 6 .
优选的,拾振器401沿待测预应力混凝土梁2长度方向等长布置,拾振器401的输出端与信号采集系统402的输入端相连,信号采集系统402的输出端与模态分析系统403的输入端相连,信号采集系统402通过采集拾振器401测得的振动信号,并将其传至模态分析系统403,模态分析系统403经过分析处理得到待测梁模态参数。Preferably, the vibration pickups 401 are equally arranged along the length direction of the prestressed concrete beam 2 to be measured, the output end of the vibration pickup 401 is connected to the input end of the signal acquisition system 402, and the output end of the signal acquisition system 402 is connected to the modal analysis system. The input end of 403 is connected. The signal acquisition system 402 collects the vibration signal measured by the vibration pickup 401 and transmits it to the modal analysis system 403. The modal analysis system 403 obtains the modal parameters of the beam to be measured through analysis and processing.
可以想到的是,在实际设计中,激振器301设置在行走小车11上,行走小车11设置在地面上,每次模态测试,通过行走小车将激振器快速地将运输到指定激振点,使模态测试更加便捷有效。It can be imagined that in the actual design, the exciter 301 is set on the walking trolley 11, and the walking trolley 11 is set on the ground. For each modal test, the vibration exciter is quickly transported to the designated excitation site through the walking trolley. points to make modal testing more convenient and effective.
需要说明的是,在实际应用中,简支支座1包括固定安装在地面上的基座101和设置在基座101上的铰支座102,两个铰支座102用于支撑待测梁(预应力混凝土梁),基座101通过紧固螺栓固定安装在实验室地面10上。在待测预应力混凝土梁2的顶部还设有用于将疲劳试验机5施加的荷载传递给待测梁的荷载分配梁7,荷载分配梁7的两端通过铰支座8与待测预应力混凝土梁2连接,待测预应力混凝土梁的两端简支支座对应的梁上端、梁跨中位置及荷载加载点底部均设有位移计9。试验时,按照静力单调加载试验的加载程序,进行分级加载至疲劳上限荷载,量测各级荷载下的应变、裂缝、挠度等及其发展情况。It should be noted that in practical applications, the simply supported support 1 includes a base 101 fixedly installed on the ground and a hinge support 102 provided on the base 101. The two hinge supports 102 are used to support the beam to be measured. (prestressed concrete beam), the base 101 is fixedly installed on the laboratory floor 10 through fastening bolts. There is also a load distribution beam 7 on the top of the prestressed concrete beam 2 to be tested for transmitting the load applied by the fatigue testing machine 5 to the beam to be tested. Both ends of the load distribution beam 7 are connected to the prestressed concrete beam to be tested through hinge supports 8 The concrete beam 2 is connected. Displacement meters 9 are provided at the upper end of the beam, the mid-span position of the beam and the bottom of the load loading point corresponding to the simply supported supports at both ends of the prestressed concrete beam to be measured. During the test, according to the loading procedure of the static monotonic loading test, graded loading is carried out to the fatigue upper limit load, and the strains, cracks, deflections, etc. and their development under each level of load are measured.
下面将结合具体实施例对本发明作进一步的说明。The present invention will be further described below in conjunction with specific embodiments.
实施例Example
选取32m普通高度标准铁路桥梁预应力混凝土简支T梁为原型梁,根据相似理论,制作原型梁的1:6缩尺模型作为待测预应力混凝土梁3,设计参数见下表1。本实施例共制备了3根模型梁,其中一根梁(编号No.1)用于静载试验,以确定疲劳试验所需的静力极限荷载Pu,实测Pu=265kN;另外两根(编号No.2,No.3)用于疲劳试验。A 32m ordinary height standard railway bridge prestressed concrete simply supported T-beam was selected as the prototype beam. Based on the similarity theory, a 1:6 scale model of the prototype beam was made as the prestressed concrete beam to be tested 3. The design parameters are shown in Table 1 below. A total of three model beams were prepared in this example, one of which (No. 1) was used for static load testing to determine the static limit load P u required for the fatigue test. The actual measured P u =265kN; the other two ( No. 2, No. 3) are used for fatigue testing.
表1模型梁设计参数Table 1 Model beam design parameters
混凝土配合比为水泥:水:石:砂:减水剂=460:118:1092:735:4.2,各试验梁浇筑时预留混凝土试块,其力学性能测试与模型梁试验同时进行,测得力学性能见下表2:The concrete mix ratio is cement: water: stone: sand: water-reducing agent = 460: 118: 1092: 735: 4.2. Concrete test blocks are reserved when pouring each test beam, and its mechanical properties are tested at the same time as the model beam test. The measured The mechanical properties are shown in Table 2 below:
表2实测混凝土力学性能参数Table 2 Measured concrete mechanical performance parameters
纵筋采用HRB335级钢筋,直径10mm;按照铁路桥梁设计构造要求,在梁纯弯段内布置直径8mm(HPB300)、间距为100mm的箍筋,其它区段内为50mm。钢筋的实测力学性能参数见下表3:The longitudinal bars use HRB335 grade steel bars with a diameter of 10mm; according to the design and construction requirements of railway bridges, stirrups with a diameter of 8mm (HPB300) and a spacing of 100mm are arranged in the pure bend section of the beam, and 50mm in other sections. The measured mechanical property parameters of steel bars are shown in Table 3 below:
表3实测钢筋力学性能参数Table 3 Measured mechanical properties parameters of steel bars
预应力钢筋采用2束7φ5钢绞线,公称直径d=15.2mm,极限强度标准值fptk=1860MPa,采用抛物线型布置。预应力筋采用两端张拉(单孔千斤顶单根钢绞线对拉,分两次完成),张拉控制应力σcon=1116MPa,超张拉5%,张拉时混凝土龄期均超过28天。The prestressed steel bars use two bundles of 7φ5 steel strands, with a nominal diameter d = 15.2mm, a standard ultimate strength value f ptk = 1860MPa, and a parabolic layout. The prestressed tendons are tensioned at both ends (single-hole jacks and single steel strands are stretched in two steps), the tensioning control stress σ con = 1116MPa, over-tensioning 5%, and the age of the concrete during tensioning exceeds 28 sky.
一种预应力混凝土梁疲劳损伤状态表征方法,主要包括以下步骤:A method for characterizing the fatigue damage state of prestressed concrete beams, which mainly includes the following steps:
1)预应力混凝土梁的初始动力参数测定及首次静载试验:将待测预应力混凝土梁2放置于简支支座1上,首先对初始完好待测预应力混凝土梁2进行动力测试,动力试验采用激振法,通过移动激振器301至各阶理论振型幅值最大幅值点附近进行扫频激振,通过拾振器401采集加速度信号后传递至模态测试分析系统进行模态分析,得到各阶模态参数;然后按照四点弯曲加载方式布置荷载分配梁7,荷载分配梁7通过铰支座8放置于待测预应力混凝土梁2上,并保证疲劳试验机5的作动头中心点正对着待测预应力混凝土梁2中心点和荷载分配梁7的中心点;按照静力单调加载试验的加载程序,进行分级加载至疲劳上限荷载,量测各级荷载下的应变、裂缝、挠度等及其发展情况;1) Measurement of the initial dynamic parameters of the prestressed concrete beam and the first static load test: Place the prestressed concrete beam 2 to be tested on the simply supported support 1, and first perform a dynamic test on the initial intact prestressed concrete beam 2 to be tested. The test adopts the excitation method, by moving the exciter 301 to the vicinity of the maximum amplitude point of the theoretical vibration shape of each order to perform frequency sweep excitation, and collects the acceleration signal through the vibration pickup 401 and then transmits it to the modal test analysis system for modal analysis. Analyze and obtain the modal parameters of each order; then arrange the load distribution beam 7 according to the four-point bending loading method, and place the load distribution beam 7 on the prestressed concrete beam 2 to be tested through the hinge support 8, and ensure the operation of the fatigue testing machine 5 The center point of the moving head is directly opposite to the center point of the prestressed concrete beam 2 to be tested and the center point of the load distribution beam 7; according to the loading procedure of the static monotonic loading test, graded loading is carried out to the fatigue upper limit load, and the load under each level of load is measured. Strain, crack, deflection, etc. and their development;
2)疲劳加载历程中预应力混凝土梁静载试验及动力测试:完成步骤1)后,开启疲劳试验机5进行疲劳加载,在疲劳荷载循环次数达到1万次、5万次、10万次、25万次等后停机(以此类推,直至待测预应力混凝土梁2接近疲劳破坏时),分别如步骤1)所述进行一次动力测试和加载至疲劳上限荷载的静载试验;待测预应力混凝土梁2疲劳破坏后,再进行一次动力测试和静载试验。2) Static load test and dynamic test of prestressed concrete beams during the fatigue loading process: After completing step 1), start the fatigue testing machine 5 to perform fatigue loading, and the number of fatigue load cycles reaches 10,000, 50,000, 100,000, and 250,000. After the second stop (and by analogy, until the prestressed concrete beam 2 to be tested is close to fatigue failure), a dynamic test and a static load test loaded to the fatigue upper limit load are performed as described in step 1); the prestressed concrete beam to be tested is After the fatigue failure of beam 2, a dynamic test and a static load test were conducted.
疲劳试验采用等幅正弦波加载,加载频率为3.5Hz,试验主要参数见下表4,疲劳荷载下限值取Pmin=0.2Pu,疲劳荷载上限值Pmax分别取0.45Pu和0.5Pu。The fatigue test adopts constant amplitude sine wave loading with a loading frequency of 3.5Hz. The main test parameters are shown in Table 4 below. The lower limit of fatigue load is P min = 0.2P u and the upper limit of fatigue load P max is 0.45P u and 0.5 respectively. Pu .
表4模型梁试验参数及疲劳寿命Table 4 Model beam test parameters and fatigue life
3)预应力混凝土梁振动模态参数分析:如步骤1)和步骤2)所示,分别于初次静载前和疲劳历程中对初始完好待测预应力混凝土梁2进行动力测试,通过模态测试分析系统进行振动模态参数分析,得到疲劳历程中各阶模态参数。3) Analysis of vibration modal parameters of prestressed concrete beams: As shown in steps 1) and 2), perform dynamic tests on the initially intact prestressed concrete beam 2 to be tested before the initial static load and during the fatigue process. Through the modal The test analysis system conducts vibration modal parameter analysis and obtains modal parameters of each order in the fatigue process.
在初始动力参数测定时,将荷载分配梁7与简支支撑8装置撤去,将与拾振器401配套的磁性支座粘贴在待测预应力混凝土梁2上,拾振器401通过吸附在磁性支座上,从而固定在待测预应力混凝土梁2上;疲劳试验循环加载中,取下拾振器401保管,在疲劳一定次数停机进行动力测试时,取出拾振器401吸附在磁性支座上再次测量。When measuring the initial dynamic parameters, the load distribution beam 7 and the simply supported support 8 are removed, and the magnetic support matched with the vibration pickup 401 is pasted on the prestressed concrete beam 2 to be measured. The vibration pickup 401 is adsorbed on the magnetic On the support, it is fixed on the prestressed concrete beam 2 to be tested; during the fatigue test cycle loading, the vibration pickup 401 is removed and kept. When the fatigue test is stopped for a certain number of times for dynamic testing, the vibration pickup 401 is taken out and adsorbed on the magnetic support. Measure again.
模态测试分析系统选用的模态分析方法为随机子空间SSI法,该方法不用输入外部激励或外部激励不可测,可以有效地从环境激励的结构响应中提取结构模态参数。The modal analysis method selected for the modal test analysis system is the random subspace SSI method. This method does not require the input of external excitations or the external excitations are unmeasurable, and can effectively extract structural modal parameters from the structural response to environmental excitations.
4)预应力混凝土梁疲劳损伤状态评估:通过步骤3)分析得到的疲劳历程中各阶模态参数,经过相关分析进行待测预应力混凝土梁2的疲劳损伤状态评估。4) Fatigue damage status assessment of prestressed concrete beams: The modal parameters of each order in the fatigue history obtained through the analysis in step 3) are analyzed to evaluate the fatigue damage status of the prestressed concrete beam 2 to be measured.
本实施例中采用的仪器型号及生产厂家见下表5:The instrument models and manufacturers used in this example are shown in Table 5 below:
表5试验仪器Table 5 Test Instruments
基于本发明所述的一种基于模态参数的预应力混凝土梁疲劳损伤状态表征方法及测试装置,得到了两根疲劳试验梁在疲劳历程中的频率如下表6。Based on the fatigue damage state characterization method and testing device of prestressed concrete beams based on modal parameters described in the present invention, the frequencies of the two fatigue test beams in the fatigue history are obtained as shown in Table 6.
表6疲劳历程实测及退化比汇总表Table 6 Summary table of measured fatigue history and degradation ratio
定义疲劳作用下频率退化比:Define the frequency degradation ratio under fatigue:
γ(n)=wn/w0 γ(n)=w n /w 0
式中,ω0为完好梁的初始频率;ωn为疲劳n万次后梁的频率。则得到疲劳历程中前三阶实测频率的频率退化比上表6,并绘制频率退化比曲线见附图6所示。In the formula, ω 0 is the initial frequency of the intact beam; ω n is the frequency of the beam after fatigue n thousand times. Then the frequency degradation ratio of the first three measured frequencies in the fatigue history is obtained in Table 6, and the frequency degradation ratio curve is drawn as shown in Figure 6.
由上表6和附图6可见,随着疲劳次数的增加,预应力混凝土梁的前三阶频率均有所下降。加载开始,模态频率即出现较显著的降幅;进入疲劳中期后,频率下降速率变缓,以一较小的数值在逐渐降低,有波动但基本保持稳定;达到疲劳寿命时,出现一次幅值较小的降低,最终梁No.2前三阶频率降低幅值分别为19.5%,15.8%,9.0%,梁No.3前三阶频率降低幅值分别为19.4%,13.6%,7.4%。由此可见,在疲劳作用下,一阶频率的频率降低幅度最大;二阶频率次之;而三阶频率的频率降低幅度最小。It can be seen from Table 6 above and Figure 6 that as the number of fatigue times increases, the first three frequencies of prestressed concrete beams all decrease. At the beginning of loading, the modal frequency shows a significant decrease; after entering the middle stage of fatigue, the frequency decrease rate slows down and gradually decreases to a smaller value, fluctuating but basically remaining stable; when the fatigue life is reached, an amplitude appears. Smaller reduction, the final frequency reduction amplitudes of the first three orders of beam No. 2 are 19.5%, 15.8%, and 9.0% respectively, and the reduction amplitudes of the first three frequencies of beam No. 3 are 19.4%, 13.6%, and 7.4% respectively. It can be seen that under the effect of fatigue, the first-order frequency has the greatest frequency reduction; the second-order frequency follows; and the third-order frequency has the smallest frequency reduction.
从附图6中还可以看出:预应力混凝土梁模态频率的退化过程也存在类似疲劳刚度退化的三阶段规律。疲劳初期模态频率降幅较大,这是因为在加载刚开始时,混凝土裂缝的开展,以及有效预应力损失较大,使试验梁刚度有较大幅度的降低,从而使梁模态频率呈现出迅速减小的特点。进入疲劳中期后,裂缝在缓慢伸延、扩展,有效预应力损失速率减小并趋于稳定,钢筋和混凝土间出现局部粘结滑移破坏,使梁刚度呈近似线性的发展状态,模态频率也近似呈线性减小,相对发展较为稳定。疲劳末期,混凝土裂缝再次急剧扩展并出现树枝状裂缝,此时梁体刚度再次降低,故频率再次有一个下降阶段。It can also be seen from Figure 6 that the degradation process of modal frequency of prestressed concrete beams also has a three-stage law similar to fatigue stiffness degradation. The modal frequency decreases significantly in the early stage of fatigue. This is because at the beginning of loading, the development of concrete cracks and the large loss of effective prestress cause the stiffness of the test beam to decrease significantly, resulting in the modal frequency of the beam showing Characteristics of rapid reduction. After entering the middle stage of fatigue, the cracks are slowly extending and expanding, the effective prestress loss rate decreases and becomes stable, and local bond slip failure occurs between the steel bars and concrete, causing the beam stiffness to develop in an approximately linear state, and the modal frequency also decreases. It decreases approximately linearly, and the relative development is relatively stable. At the end of fatigue, concrete cracks expand sharply again and dendritic cracks appear. At this time, the stiffness of the beam body decreases again, so the frequency once again has a decreasing stage.
定义基于模态频率的损伤变量:Define damage variables based on modal frequencies:
其中:w0为初始模态频率,wN为待测预应力混凝土梁疲劳破坏时的模态频率,N为待测预应力混凝土梁疲劳破坏时的循环次数。本式定义的损伤变量D的变化范围在0~1之间;D=0对应于试验梁的无损状态;D=1对应梁完全疲劳破坏。损伤变量D为单调递增的函数,即试验梁的疲劳损伤程度随荷载循环次数的增加而增大,且损伤是不可逆的。Among them: w 0 is the initial modal frequency, w N is the modal frequency when the prestressed concrete beam is tested for fatigue failure, and N is the number of cycles when the prestressed concrete beam is tested for fatigue failure. The damage variable D defined by this formula ranges from 0 to 1; D=0 corresponds to the damage-free state of the test beam; D=1 corresponds to complete fatigue failure of the beam. The damage variable D is a monotonically increasing function, that is, the fatigue damage degree of the test beam increases with the increase in the number of load cycles, and the damage is irreversible.
考虑到实际工程的桥梁动力测试中,由于第一阶模态频率的能量等占有较大比例,具有较高的准确性,同时由前面研究发现第一阶模态频率的频率退化幅度最大,所以这里采用第一阶模态频率来定义损伤变量。综合众多学者对损伤累积拟合曲线的研究,经过比选后,选用下式进行拟合:Considering that in actual engineering bridge dynamic testing, since the energy of the first-order modal frequency occupies a larger proportion, it has higher accuracy. At the same time, it was found from previous research that the frequency degradation amplitude of the first-order modal frequency is the largest, so The first-order modal frequency is used here to define the damage variables. Based on the research of many scholars on the damage cumulative fitting curve, after comparison and selection, the following formula was selected for fitting:
其中:α,β为待拟合参数,n为循环次数,N为待测预应力混凝土梁疲劳破坏时的循环次数。由试验结果采用最小二乘法进行非线性回归分析,得到参数见下表7。两片梁的拟合度R2均接近100%,说明该模型拟合程度较好。Among them: α, β are the parameters to be fitted, n is the number of cycles, and N is the number of cycles when the fatigue failure of the prestressed concrete beam is to be measured. The test results were analyzed using the least squares method for nonlinear regression, and the parameters obtained are shown in Table 7 below. The fitting degree R2 of the two beams is close to 100%, indicating that the model fits well.
表7疲劳损伤非线性模型拟合参数Table 7 Fatigue damage nonlinear model fitting parameters
根据上述拟合曲线和拟合参数即可得到基于一阶模态频率的两根梁疲劳累积损伤演化规律,见附图7。According to the above fitting curve and fitting parameters, the fatigue cumulative damage evolution law of the two beams based on the first-order modal frequency can be obtained, as shown in Figure 7.
从附图7可以看出,各试验梁疲劳损伤演化规律具有明显的非线性。整个疲劳损伤演化可分为3个阶段。在损伤初始发展的第1阶段,疲劳累积损伤急剧增加达到稳定水平;第2阶段,疲劳累积损伤平稳缓慢增长;随着循环次数增加,疲劳累积损伤进入第3阶段,在第3阶段疲劳累积损伤在第2阶段累积损伤的基础上又开始急剧增加,直至试验梁完全破坏失去承载力。It can be seen from Figure 7 that the fatigue damage evolution law of each test beam has obvious nonlinearity. The entire fatigue damage evolution can be divided into three stages. In the first stage of the initial development of damage, the cumulative fatigue damage increases sharply and reaches a stable level; in the second stage, the cumulative fatigue damage increases steadily and slowly; as the number of cycles increases, the cumulative fatigue damage enters the third stage, and in the third stage, the cumulative fatigue damage On the basis of the accumulated damage in the second stage, it began to increase sharply until the test beam was completely destroyed and lost its bearing capacity.
对比两根梁疲劳损伤演化曲线还可以看出,疲劳应力幅越大,其损伤发展越剧烈。疲劳前期,应力幅较大的梁No.2损伤发展程度较梁No.3更迅速,在两根梁分别达到数值约为0.68和0.56的损伤阈值时,进入损伤稳定发展的疲劳中期;损伤末期梁No.2的阈值约为0.85,大于梁No.3的阈值0.82。纵观整个发展过程,应力幅较大的梁损伤发展总是超前于应力幅较小的梁,而相比而言的大应力幅梁的低寿命特性也显示了此演化规律的合理性。Comparing the fatigue damage evolution curves of the two beams, it can also be seen that the greater the fatigue stress amplitude, the more severe the damage development. In the early stage of fatigue, the damage of beam No. 2 with larger stress amplitude develops more rapidly than that of beam No. 3. When the two beams reach the damage thresholds of approximately 0.68 and 0.56 respectively, they enter the middle fatigue stage in which damage develops stably; at the end of the damage period The threshold value of beam No.2 is about 0.85, which is larger than the threshold value of beam No.3, 0.82. Throughout the entire development process, the damage development of beams with larger stress amplitude is always ahead of that of beams with smaller stress amplitude. In comparison, the low life characteristics of beams with large stress amplitude also show the rationality of this evolution law.
本实施例以一阶固有频率为损伤变量,有效地模拟了预应力混凝土梁三阶段非线性疲劳损伤演化规律。由此可见,通过对疲劳损伤累积曲线的研究,结合疲劳损伤三阶段阈值的识别,可为结构性能退化程度判定及剩余寿命预测提供研究基础,具有一定应用前景,为预应力混凝土梁疲劳性能研究提供了新思路。This embodiment uses the first-order natural frequency as the damage variable to effectively simulate the three-stage nonlinear fatigue damage evolution law of prestressed concrete beams. It can be seen that through the study of the fatigue damage accumulation curve, combined with the identification of the three-stage fatigue damage threshold, it can provide a research basis for the determination of the degree of structural performance degradation and the prediction of the remaining life. It has certain application prospects and provides a basis for research on the fatigue performance of prestressed concrete beams. Provides new ideas.
上述实施例仅仅是清楚地说明本发明所作的举例,而非对实施方式的限定。对于所属领域的普通技术人员来说,在上述说明的基础上还可以做出其它不同形式的变化或变动。这里也无需也无法对所有的实施例予以穷举。而由此所引申出的显而易见的变化或变动仍处于本发明的保护范围之中。The above-described embodiments are merely examples to clearly illustrate the present invention, rather than limiting the implementation. For those of ordinary skill in the art, other different forms of changes or modifications can be made based on the above description. An exhaustive list of all embodiments is neither necessary nor possible. However, obvious changes or modifications derived therefrom are still within the protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (9)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201811440739.9A CN109374452B (en) | 2018-11-29 | 2018-11-29 | A method and testing device for characterization of fatigue damage status of prestressed concrete beams |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201811440739.9A CN109374452B (en) | 2018-11-29 | 2018-11-29 | A method and testing device for characterization of fatigue damage status of prestressed concrete beams |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN109374452A CN109374452A (en) | 2019-02-22 |
| CN109374452B true CN109374452B (en) | 2023-11-10 |
Family
ID=65374613
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201811440739.9A Active CN109374452B (en) | 2018-11-29 | 2018-11-29 | A method and testing device for characterization of fatigue damage status of prestressed concrete beams |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN109374452B (en) |
Families Citing this family (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN110082080B (en) * | 2019-04-11 | 2021-03-26 | 中铁大桥局集团第二工程有限公司 | PC track beam static load test pedestal suitable for different beam lengths and curvatures |
| CN110132511B (en) * | 2019-05-30 | 2020-10-27 | 山东省建筑科学研究院有限公司 | Bridge structure monitoring and evaluating method based on dynamic deflection attenuation law |
| CN110455650A (en) * | 2019-07-10 | 2019-11-15 | 河海大学 | A rapid method for determining the fatigue life of precast cracked concrete beams |
| CN110987661B (en) * | 2019-11-25 | 2021-08-27 | 中南大学 | Method for improving Harris distributed structural surface shear damage constitutive model |
| CN113092290B (en) * | 2021-03-26 | 2022-05-20 | 太原理工大学 | External prestress reinforced concrete beam fatigue test device and method |
| CN113218789B (en) * | 2021-04-13 | 2022-09-20 | 同济大学 | Reinforced concrete beam post-crack fatigue performance testing system and method |
| CN115270541B (en) * | 2022-06-06 | 2025-08-26 | 湖北省路桥集团有限公司 | A method for analyzing the damage law of the overall joints of suspension bridges |
Citations (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5327358A (en) * | 1991-08-07 | 1994-07-05 | The Texas A&M University System | Apparatus and method for damage detection |
| GB0227382D0 (en) * | 2001-12-18 | 2002-12-31 | Visteon Global Tech Inc | Fatigue sensitivity determination procedure |
| GB201104864D0 (en) * | 2011-03-23 | 2011-05-04 | Rolls Royce Plc | Device for fatigue testing a specimen |
| NL2010556C2 (en) * | 2013-04-03 | 2014-10-06 | Onderzoekscentrum Voor Aanwending Van Staal N V | Fatigue testing of a test specimen. |
| CN104297456A (en) * | 2014-10-11 | 2015-01-21 | 陈振富 | Method for recognizing meso-structure parameter of dynamic performance of radiation shield concrete |
| CN104931364A (en) * | 2015-06-04 | 2015-09-23 | 浙江大学 | Reinforced concrete structure fatigue test method and device based on piezomagnetic effect |
| JP2016102323A (en) * | 2014-11-28 | 2016-06-02 | 大成建設株式会社 | Design method of prestress concrete girder |
| CN106404914A (en) * | 2016-08-26 | 2017-02-15 | 四川省建筑科学研究院 | Method used for measuring structure damages and safety conditions of Ying county buddha tower |
| CN209167040U (en) * | 2018-11-29 | 2019-07-26 | 中南大学 | A kind of prestressed concrete beam fatigue damage test device |
Family Cites Families (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6843128B2 (en) * | 2002-12-04 | 2005-01-18 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Method for determining automotive brake structure vibration damping and friction material bonding |
| US7555951B2 (en) * | 2006-05-24 | 2009-07-07 | Honeywell International Inc. | Determination of remaining useful life of gas turbine blade |
| US8577628B2 (en) * | 2009-04-10 | 2013-11-05 | University Of South Carolina | System and method for modal identification using smart mobile sensors |
-
2018
- 2018-11-29 CN CN201811440739.9A patent/CN109374452B/en active Active
Patent Citations (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5327358A (en) * | 1991-08-07 | 1994-07-05 | The Texas A&M University System | Apparatus and method for damage detection |
| GB0227382D0 (en) * | 2001-12-18 | 2002-12-31 | Visteon Global Tech Inc | Fatigue sensitivity determination procedure |
| GB201104864D0 (en) * | 2011-03-23 | 2011-05-04 | Rolls Royce Plc | Device for fatigue testing a specimen |
| NL2010556C2 (en) * | 2013-04-03 | 2014-10-06 | Onderzoekscentrum Voor Aanwending Van Staal N V | Fatigue testing of a test specimen. |
| CN104297456A (en) * | 2014-10-11 | 2015-01-21 | 陈振富 | Method for recognizing meso-structure parameter of dynamic performance of radiation shield concrete |
| JP2016102323A (en) * | 2014-11-28 | 2016-06-02 | 大成建設株式会社 | Design method of prestress concrete girder |
| CN104931364A (en) * | 2015-06-04 | 2015-09-23 | 浙江大学 | Reinforced concrete structure fatigue test method and device based on piezomagnetic effect |
| CN106404914A (en) * | 2016-08-26 | 2017-02-15 | 四川省建筑科学研究院 | Method used for measuring structure damages and safety conditions of Ying county buddha tower |
| CN209167040U (en) * | 2018-11-29 | 2019-07-26 | 中南大学 | A kind of prestressed concrete beam fatigue damage test device |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
| Title |
|---|
| 损伤梁动力特性的空间有限元分析;杜金龙;郭少华;;铁道科学与工程学报(第02期);全文 * |
| 曲轴疲劳裂纹扩展速率测量的扫频法;周迅;俞小莉;;浙江大学学报(工学版)(第11期);全文 * |
| 深水测试管柱-隔水管耦合涡激疲劳分析;刘红兵;陈国明;刘康;孟文波;韩彬彬;刘秀全;;中国石油大学学报(自然科学版)(第01期);全文 * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN109374452A (en) | 2019-02-22 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN109374452B (en) | A method and testing device for characterization of fatigue damage status of prestressed concrete beams | |
| CN110031312B (en) | An in-situ testing method for mechanical properties of rusted prestressed tendons | |
| CN209167040U (en) | A kind of prestressed concrete beam fatigue damage test device | |
| Schumacher et al. | Estimating operating load conditions on reinforced concrete highway bridges with b-value analysis from acoustic emission monitoring | |
| CN111855405B (en) | Method for predicting FRP-concrete beam interface crack length under variable amplitude fatigue | |
| CN104020056B (en) | The loading method of concrete creep test under the effect of a kind of curved scissors pressure compound stress | |
| CN104880369A (en) | Damaged prestressed concrete flexural member decompression moment test method | |
| Akramov et al. | Method of experimental research of concrete beams with fiberglass reinforcement for bending | |
| Vázquez-Herrero et al. | Evaluation of strand bond properties along the transfer length of prestressed lightweight concrete members | |
| CN104122109B (en) | A kind of system identifying bridge structure stiffness injury | |
| CN104034609B (en) | A kind of test method of stress gradient on the impact of beams of concrete Creep Characteristics of studying | |
| Li et al. | Time-dependent behaviours of railway prestressed concrete sleepers in a track system | |
| Deng et al. | Monitoring damage evolution of steel strand using acoustic emission technique and rate process theory | |
| CN114112671A (en) | Creep test piece for simultaneously measuring component-level multi-stress sections and test method thereof | |
| CN117782376A (en) | A method for detecting the engineering quality of assembled anchor rods or anchor cable frame beams and its application | |
| Zhang et al. | Health monitoring-based assessment of reinforcement with prestressed steel strand for cable-stayed bridge | |
| CN105784566A (en) | Device and method for monitoring deformation evolution of concrete pores under continuous tension/compression stress | |
| Mazars et al. | Behavior and assessment of massive structures: an overview of the french research programs CEOS. fr and VeRCoRs | |
| CN104458401A (en) | Continuous beam testing method | |
| CN105045944B (en) | A kind of engineering prestressing technique use state appraisal procedure | |
| CN204228372U (en) | Be applicable to the integrated apparatus that small bridge is fast and safely diagnosed | |
| TW202317960A (en) | Method for identifying prestress force in single-span or multi-span pci girder-bridges | |
| Zhang | Flexural simulation analysis of RC T-girders strengthed with polyurethane cement-prestressed steel wire ropes | |
| Kytinou et al. | An innovative health-monitoring approach for fiber-reinforced polymer debonding diagnosis through pullout and shear tests | |
| Liu et al. | Effect of diagonal cracks on shear stiffness of pre-stressed concrete beam |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |