EP1042208B1 - Method and apparatus for detecting yarn defects during production, in particular chenille yarns - Google Patents
Method and apparatus for detecting yarn defects during production, in particular chenille yarns Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1042208B1 EP1042208B1 EP98966419A EP98966419A EP1042208B1 EP 1042208 B1 EP1042208 B1 EP 1042208B1 EP 98966419 A EP98966419 A EP 98966419A EP 98966419 A EP98966419 A EP 98966419A EP 1042208 B1 EP1042208 B1 EP 1042208B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- yarn
- optical sensor
- shadow
- defects
- array
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65H—HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
- B65H63/00—Warning or safety devices, e.g. automatic fault detectors, stop-motions ; Quality control of the package
- B65H63/02—Warning or safety devices, e.g. automatic fault detectors, stop-motions ; Quality control of the package responsive to reduction in material tension, failure of supply, or breakage, of material
- B65H63/024—Warning or safety devices, e.g. automatic fault detectors, stop-motions ; Quality control of the package responsive to reduction in material tension, failure of supply, or breakage, of material responsive to breakage of materials
- B65H63/028—Warning or safety devices, e.g. automatic fault detectors, stop-motions ; Quality control of the package responsive to reduction in material tension, failure of supply, or breakage, of material responsive to breakage of materials characterised by the detecting or sensing element
- B65H63/032—Warning or safety devices, e.g. automatic fault detectors, stop-motions ; Quality control of the package responsive to reduction in material tension, failure of supply, or breakage, of material responsive to breakage of materials characterised by the detecting or sensing element electrical or pneumatic
- B65H63/0321—Warning or safety devices, e.g. automatic fault detectors, stop-motions ; Quality control of the package responsive to reduction in material tension, failure of supply, or breakage, of material responsive to breakage of materials characterised by the detecting or sensing element electrical or pneumatic using electronic actuators
- B65H63/0324—Warning or safety devices, e.g. automatic fault detectors, stop-motions ; Quality control of the package responsive to reduction in material tension, failure of supply, or breakage, of material responsive to breakage of materials characterised by the detecting or sensing element electrical or pneumatic using electronic actuators using photo-electric sensing means, i.e. the defect signal is a variation of light energy
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65H—HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
- B65H63/00—Warning or safety devices, e.g. automatic fault detectors, stop-motions ; Quality control of the package
- B65H63/06—Warning or safety devices, e.g. automatic fault detectors, stop-motions ; Quality control of the package responsive to presence of irregularities in running material, e.g. for severing the material at irregularities ; Control of the correct working of the yarn cleaner
- B65H63/062—Electronic slub detector
- B65H63/065—Electronic slub detector using photo-electric sensing means, i.e. the defect signal is a variation of light energy
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65H—HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
- B65H2701/00—Handled material; Storage means
- B65H2701/30—Handled filamentary material
- B65H2701/31—Textiles threads or artificial strands of filaments
Definitions
- the present invention generally relates the field of textiles and more precisely it relates to a method for detecting yarn defects during production.
- the invention but not exclusively, relates to the detection of yarns defects of chenille yarns, fancy yarns and the like.
- the invention relates to an apparatus that carries out such method.
- Chenille yarns defects, as well as defects of other yarns having high count, may be classified as long defects or short defects.
- count of yarn is normally indicated the meters of yarn necessary for making 1 kg of yarn.
- the former corresponds to a concentrated decrease of the count of yarn, that in the case of chenille is due to lack of transversal yarn, whereas chenille "burl" defects are due to local thickening of transversal yarns or to transversal yarns of increased length.
- a yarn of good quality must be without both long defects and short defects. In particular, if during production defects are detected, the yarn must be cut, the machine must be stopped and the continuity of the yarn must be restored, after having eliminated the defective portion.
- a first problem that arises from these devices is the need of optical sensors, such as high-definition photodiodes having large active area and then very expensive.
- a second problem is that, in the case of chenille yarn, its helical shape does not allow the use of these devices which, since they project a shadow, detect wrongly a defect when the plane containing a portion of yarn of chenille is parallel to the light source.
- An apparatus for detecting defects of a yarn comprising a transparent curved surface on which the yarn slides thus reducing its helix effect.
- Optical sensor means are located outside the curved surface whereas within the curvature of the transparent surface a light source is arranged. This device is not suitable for detecting defects in chenille yarns.
- a slit is present transversal to the direction of the yarn, capable of increasing the precision of defect recognition.
- said slit is located between the transparent surface and the lens means and has a thickness comprised between 0,2 mm and 2 mm.
- the computing unit comprises hardware means for analysing the shadow and for operating the stop of the yarn.
- the computing unit comprises software means for analysing the shadow and for operating the stop of the yarn.
- the transparent surface is associated to lens means capable of concentrating the image projected by the light source onto the sensor means.
- the software means residing in said computing unit comprises means for storing the profile of the yarn as projected onto the sensor means versus time and means for subtracting the stored profile from the real image of the yarn as projected onto the sensor means, whereby the defects are distinguished from the comparison of the stored profile with respect to the real image.
- the method for detecting defects has the characteristic that it comprises the steps of:
- the step of detecting comprises a step of passage of the shadow through a slit transversal to the direction of the yarn, for increasing the precision of defect recognition.
- the step of detecting comprises a step of focusing the shadow on the optical sensor.
- the step of analysing the shadow of the yarn comprises the step of storing the profile versus time of the yarn as projected onto the sensor means and subtracting the stored profile from the real image of the yarn as projected onto the sensor means, whereby the defects are distinguished after the comparison of the stored profile with respect to the real image.
- an apparatus for detecting defects on a yarn 2 during production comprises a detecting device 1 and, respectively upstream and downstream of it, braking deflector means 3 of yarn 2 and cutting means 4a and 4b of yarn 2.
- apparatus 1 comprises a drum 5, located between two shoulders 6, on which yarn 2 passes.
- yarn 2 passes substantially stretched and partially wound on drum 5 so that it is pressed against its surface.
- Light emitting means 7 are provided outside drum 5, which, always according to the invention, is transparent and comprises inside an optical sensor 8. This way the light beam coming from the emitting means 7 projects yarn 2 on optical sensor 8, that detects continuously the amplitude of its shadow.
- optical sensor 8 detects an increase or decrease of transversal size of yarn 2, beyond a certain a predetermined threshold value, the yarn is stopped and cut and then joined again after having eliminated the defective portion.
- the apparatus 1 according to the present invention is particularly suitable for detecting defects on chenille yarns, as shown in figures 2A, 2B.
- a yarn of chenille which as shown is formed by a longitudinal yarn 9 from which portions 10 of yarn project transversally, extends substantially as an helix and then its image projected is not constant although the yarn is without defects.
- the stretching action of the chenille yarn 2 on drum 5 causes, as shown in figure 2B, a pressing effect on a cylindrical surface of the transversal portions 10 of yarn, that would otherwise normally arrange according to an helix. This way a substantially homogeneous strip-like shadow is created.
- optical sensor 8 comprises a support 15 for a lens 16 located between a slit 17 and an optical sensor 18.
- Sensor 18, for the presence of lens 16 does not need a very large area, even if its precision is the same as a sensor having a much larger detecting area.
- slit 17 is transversal to yarn 2 and has a width set between 0,2 and 2 mm. This way, the projection of the shadow of the yarn on the optical sensor is substantially filtered by slit 17, thus making easier the recognition of defects by the optical sensor. With width comprised between 0,4 and 0,6 mm the maximum values of precision of recognition has been met.
- a bush 19 has been added comprising a slit 19a between the transparent drum 5 and the lens 16 transversally to the yarn, in particular orthogonal to it.
- slit 19a has a width comprised between 0,2 and 2 mm. In particular with width comprised between 0,4 and 0,6 mm the maximum values of precision of recognition have been met.
- Optical sensor 18 is connected to a computing unit, not shown, comprising an detecting apparatus like that of figure 5. It has a low-pass filter 20 with adjustable frequency of cut. Filter 20, in case the speed of the chenille being detected is enough, has an input signal like that shown in figure 6 and gives the output signal of figure 7. After differentiation versus time of the signal of figure 7 by means of an operational amplifier 21, an output signal like that of figure 8 results, that can be checked by an adjustable window comparator 22, for recognising the defect of fault or of burl. This is possible, in particular, since operational amplifier 21, beyond signalling the defect, clears the mean value, thus creating an absolute reference starting from which the threshold of the comparator is set, said reference being a voltage equal to zero.
- FIG 9 a flux diagram is shown of such microprocessor comprising the successive steps for analysing each input signal of the array of digital signals coming from the photodiode. These signals, which are the output of the analogue to digital converter, are indicated as AD.
- the software means according to the flux diagram of figure 9 carry out the reduction of the helix effect of the chenille during the sliding thereof on the optical system.
- ARRAY() is a vector having N positions which has the function of storing the values AD acquired from the analogue to digital converter A/D.
- SUM is a variable that sums the values of ARRAY() and "i" is the index of the actual location of ARRAY().
- Vm of SUM is calculated and the index "i" is incremented, checking that it is not greater than the maximum dimension N of ARRAY(i).
- Vo is calculated subtracting Vm from AD.
- Vo is the value to compare with the threshold values indicated as THRESHOLD L, for the defect of "fault” and as THRESHOLD N, for the defect of "burl". If Vo is external to values THRESHOLD L and THRESHOLD N, the microprocessor operates the cut of the yarn, otherwise it continues to repeat the above indicated calculus.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Textile Engineering (AREA)
- Investigating Materials By The Use Of Optical Means Adapted For Particular Applications (AREA)
- Filamentary Materials, Packages, And Safety Devices Therefor (AREA)
- Spinning Or Twisting Of Yarns (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention generally relates the field of textiles and more precisely it relates to a method for detecting yarn defects during production. In particular the invention, but not exclusively, relates to the detection of yarns defects of chenille yarns, fancy yarns and the like.
- Moreover, the invention relates to an apparatus that carries out such method.
- Chenille yarns defects, as well as defects of other yarns having high count, may be classified as long defects or short defects. As count of yarn is normally indicated the meters of yarn necessary for making 1 kg of yarn.
- Long defects are an increase or a decrease beyond a certain rate of the nominal count of yarn measured on a long portion of yarn.
- Short defects, peculiar to chenille, may be classified as "fault" and "burl". The former corresponds to a concentrated decrease of the count of yarn, that in the case of chenille is due to lack of transversal yarn, whereas chenille "burl" defects are due to local thickening of transversal yarns or to transversal yarns of increased length.
- A yarn of good quality must be without both long defects and short defects. In particular, if during production defects are detected, the yarn must be cut, the machine must be stopped and the continuity of the yarn must be restored, after having eliminated the defective portion.
- Many devices exist to be mounted on yarn production machines capable of detecting long defects of decrease of count of yarn as well as short defects of "fault". These devices, also called "clearers", use optical sensors that detect the shadow of the yarn projected by a light source when the yarn passes at high speed (up to 600 m/min).
- A first problem that arises from these devices is the need of optical sensors, such as high-definition photodiodes having large active area and then very expensive.
- A second problem is that, in the case of chenille yarn, its helical shape does not allow the use of these devices which, since they project a shadow, detect wrongly a defect when the plane containing a portion of yarn of chenille is parallel to the light source.
- An apparatus for detecting defects of a yarn is disclosed in DE-A-4122305, comprising a transparent curved surface on which the yarn slides thus reducing its helix effect. Optical sensor means are located outside the curved surface whereas within the curvature of the transparent surface a light source is arranged. This device is not suitable for detecting defects in chenille yarns.
- All the above devices, moreover, are not capable of detecting defects of "burl".
- It is object of the present invention to provide an apparatus for detecting defects in yarns, in particular but not exclusively chenille yarns or fancy yarns, that is capable of overcoming the existing problems of the prior art above described.
- It is another object of the present invention to provide an apparatus for detecting both defects of burl and of fault as well as chenille yarns long defects that the device of the prior art are not capable of detecting all together.
- It is moreover object of the present invention to provide an apparatus for detecting defects on a yarn that carries out the method according to the previous objects.
- It is a particular object of the apparatus according to the invention the detection of defects with at least the same definition of the existing ones, but with a less expensive construction.
- These and other objects are achieved by the apparatus and by the method for detecting defects on a yarn according to the present invention.
- The apparatus is characterised in that it comprises:
- a transparent curved surface on which the yarn can slide;
- dragging means capable of causing said yarn to slide against said transparent curved surface, to reduce the helix effect of the yarn;
- optical sensor means and a light source located at opposite sides with respect to the transparent surface;
- a computing unit connected to the optical sensor means capable of analysing and controlling the shadow projected by the light source onto the optical sensor means through the transparent surface as well as of operating the stop of the yarn when defects are detected.
- Between the transparent surface and the optical sensor means a slit is present transversal to the direction of the yarn, capable of increasing the precision of defect recognition. Preferably, said slit is located between the transparent surface and the lens means and has a thickness comprised between 0,2 mm and 2 mm.
- Preferably, the computing unit comprises hardware means for analysing the shadow and for operating the stop of the yarn.
- Alternatively, the computing unit comprises software means for analysing the shadow and for operating the stop of the yarn.
- Advantageously, the transparent surface is associated to lens means capable of concentrating the image projected by the light source onto the sensor means.
- In an embodiment particularly suitable for the control of chenille, the software means residing in said computing unit comprises means for storing the profile of the yarn as projected onto the sensor means versus time and means for subtracting the stored profile from the real image of the yarn as projected onto the sensor means, whereby the defects are distinguished from the comparison of the stored profile with respect to the real image.
- The method for detecting defects has the characteristic that it comprises the steps of:
- dragging the yarn between a light source and an optical sensor;
- stretching and pressing the yarn on a curved transparent surface located between the light source and the optical sensor, the yarn sliding on the transparent curved surface;
- detecting the shadow of the yarn projected by the light source on the optical sensor through the transparent curved surface;
- checking the shadow and stopping the dragging at the detection of a defect, with cut and removal of the defective portion.
- The step of detecting comprises a step of passage of the shadow through a slit transversal to the direction of the yarn, for increasing the precision of defect recognition.
- Advantageously, the step of detecting comprises a step of focusing the shadow on the optical sensor.
- Preferably the step of analysing the shadow of the yarn comprises the step of storing the profile versus time of the yarn as projected onto the sensor means and subtracting the stored profile from the real image of the yarn as projected onto the sensor means, whereby the defects are distinguished after the comparison of the stored profile with respect to the real image.
- Further characteristics and advantages of the apparatus for detecting defects of a yarn and of the corresponding method according to the invention will be made clearer with the following, but not limitative, exemplifying description with reference to the attached drawings, wherein:
- figure 1 shows a diagrammatical view of an apparatus for detecting defects on a yarn which can be arranged on a machine for the production of said yarn;
- figures 2A and 2B show respectively an elevational and cross sectional view of a tubular transparent element on which said yarn slides;
- figures 3A and 3B show respectively a defect of "fault" and of "burl" in a yarn of chenille;
- figure 4 shows a cross sectional view of an optical apparatus comprising a lens suitable for being inserted into said tubular transparent element;
- figure 4A shows a different embodiment of the optical apparatus of figure 4 comprising a slit transversal to the yarn for filtering the light;
- figure 5 shows in a diagrammatic view the hardware of a control unit of the yarn associated to an optical sensor;
- figures 6, 7 and 8 show three types of signal respectively input, intermediate and output signals of the control unit of figure 5;
- figure 9 shows a flux diagram of software means residing in a microprocessor computing unit connected to said optical sensor means.
- With reference to figure 1, an apparatus for detecting defects on a
yarn 2 during production comprises a detecting device 1 and, respectively upstream and downstream of it, braking deflector means 3 ofyarn 2 and 4a and 4b ofcutting means yarn 2. - In more detail, apparatus 1 comprises a
drum 5, located between twoshoulders 6, on whichyarn 2 passes. - According to the invention,
yarn 2 passes substantially stretched and partially wound ondrum 5 so that it is pressed against its surface. - Light emitting means 7 are provided outside
drum 5, which, always according to the invention, is transparent and comprises inside anoptical sensor 8. This way the light beam coming from the emitting means 7projects yarn 2 onoptical sensor 8, that detects continuously the amplitude of its shadow. - When
optical sensor 8 detects an increase or decrease of transversal size ofyarn 2, beyond a certain a predetermined threshold value, the yarn is stopped and cut and then joined again after having eliminated the defective portion. - The apparatus 1 according to the present invention is particularly suitable for detecting defects on chenille yarns, as shown in figures 2A, 2B. In fact, a yarn of chenille, which as shown is formed by a
longitudinal yarn 9 from whichportions 10 of yarn project transversally, extends substantially as an helix and then its image projected is not constant although the yarn is without defects. - The stretching action of the
chenille yarn 2 ondrum 5 causes, as shown in figure 2B, a pressing effect on a cylindrical surface of thetransversal portions 10 of yarn, that would otherwise normally arrange according to an helix. This way a substantially homogeneous strip-like shadow is created. - With respect to the prior art, in which the yarn is not pressed on a surface during the step of detecting defects, according to the present invention it is possible to detect defects of "fault", as those shown in figure 3A, without the risk of confusion. Otherwise this confusion could occur in case of
transversal yarns 10 locally parallel to thelight beam 7 that illuminatesyarn 2. - The need, then, for the yarn of chenille of being projected integrally is very expensive because it requires optical sensors with large surface, for example large area photodiodes, because it is necessary to detect the whole shadow of the yarn. This aspect is particularly important for detecting the defects of "burl" of a yarn of chenille as that shown in figure 3B.
- In a preferred embodiment of the invention, shown in figure 4,
optical sensor 8 comprises asupport 15 for alens 16 located between aslit 17 and anoptical sensor 18.Sensor 18, for the presence oflens 16, does not need a very large area, even if its precision is the same as a sensor having a much larger detecting area. - Preferably, slit 17 is transversal to
yarn 2 and has a width set between 0,2 and 2 mm. This way, the projection of the shadow of the yarn on the optical sensor is substantially filtered byslit 17, thus making easier the recognition of defects by the optical sensor. With width comprised between 0,4 and 0,6 mm the maximum values of precision of recognition has been met. - As shown in figure 4A, according to a preferred embodiment of the invention, to the sensor of figure 4 a
bush 19 has been added comprising aslit 19a between thetransparent drum 5 and thelens 16 transversally to the yarn, in particular orthogonal to it. This way, the projection of the yarn shadow on the optical sensor is filtered byslit 19a, instead of slit 17 which can be of whichever larger size. Even in this embodiment, preferably, slit 19a has a width comprised between 0,2 and 2 mm. In particular with width comprised between 0,4 and 0,6 mm the maximum values of precision of recognition have been met. -
Optical sensor 18 is connected to a computing unit, not shown, comprising an detecting apparatus like that of figure 5. It has a low-pass filter 20 with adjustable frequency of cut.Filter 20, in case the speed of the chenille being detected is enough, has an input signal like that shown in figure 6 and gives the output signal of figure 7. After differentiation versus time of the signal of figure 7 by means of anoperational amplifier 21, an output signal like that of figure 8 results, that can be checked by anadjustable window comparator 22, for recognising the defect of fault or of burl. This is possible, in particular, sinceoperational amplifier 21, beyond signalling the defect, clears the mean value, thus creating an absolute reference starting from which the threshold of the comparator is set, said reference being a voltage equal to zero. - Instead of the apparatus of figure 5, according to a different embodiment of the invention, it is possible to provide software means that reside in the computing unit and that analyse a signal resulting from an analogue to digital converter and a microprocessor, known in the art. In figure 9 a flux diagram is shown of such microprocessor comprising the successive steps for analysing each input signal of the array of digital signals coming from the photodiode. These signals, which are the output of the analogue to digital converter, are indicated as AD.
- In more detail, the software means according to the flux diagram of figure 9 carry out the reduction of the helix effect of the chenille during the sliding thereof on the optical system. In a first step of the calculus the variables ARRAY(), SUM, and "i" are reset. ARRAY() is a vector having N positions which has the function of storing the values AD acquired from the analogue to digital converter A/D. SUM is a variable that sums the values of ARRAY() and "i" is the index of the actual location of ARRAY(). After having cleared the variables ARRAY(i), SUM and "i", each value of AD is stored in ARRAY(i), and is added to the previous value of SUM and of ARRAY(i). Then, the mean value Vm of SUM is calculated and the index "i" is incremented, checking that it is not greater than the maximum dimension N of ARRAY(i). Then the value Vo is calculated subtracting Vm from AD. Vo is the value to compare with the threshold values indicated as THRESHOLD L, for the defect of "fault" and as THRESHOLD N, for the defect of "burl". If Vo is external to values THRESHOLD L and THRESHOLD N, the microprocessor operates the cut of the yarn, otherwise it continues to repeat the above indicated calculus.
- The foregoing description of the specific embodiments will so fully reveal the general nature of the invention that others can, by applying current knowledge, readily modify and/or adapt for various applications such specific embodiments without undue experimentation and without departing from the generic concept, and, therefore, such adaptations and modifications should and are intended to be comprehended within the meaning and range of equivalents of the disclosed embodiments. The means and materials for carrying out various disclosed functions may take to variety of alternative forms without departing from the invention. It is to be understood that the phraseology or terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description and not of limitation.
Claims (11)
- Apparatus for detecting defects on a yarn (2,9) comprising:characterised in thata transparent curved surface (5);dragging means capable of causing said yarn (2,9) to slide against said transparent curved surface (5), to reduce the helix effect of the yarn (2,9);optical sensor means (8) and a light source (7) associated to said transparent curved surface (5);a computing unit connected to said optical sensor means (8) capable of analysing and controlling the shadow of said yarn (2,9) projected by said light source (7) on said optical sensor means (8) through said curved transparent surface (5) and to operate the stop of said dragging means and the cut of said yarn (2,9) when said defects are detected;said optical sensor means (8) and said light source (7) are located at opposite sides of said transparent curved surface (5), anda slit (17) transversal to the direction of the yarn (2,9) is arranged between said transparent curved surface (5) and said optical sensor means (8), whereby said slit (17) is capable of increasing the precision of defect recognition.
- Apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said transparent curved surface (5) is associated to lens means (16) capable of concentrating the image projected onto said sensor means (8) from said light source (7).
- Apparatus according to claim 2, wherein said slit (17) has a thickness comprised between 0,2 mm and 2 mm.
- Apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said computing unit comprises hardware means for analysing the shadow and for operating the stop of said yarn (2,9).
- Apparatus according to claim 4, wherein said hardware means comprises:a low-pass filter with adjustable frequency of cut;a first operational amplifier for differentiating versus time the output signal of said filter;a second operational amplifier for subtracting said differentiated signal from the mean value of the output signal of said filter and for recognising a defect of fault or of burl after comparing it with a threshold value.
- Apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said computing unit comprises software means residing in it for analysing the shadow of said yarn (2,9) and for operating the stop of said yarn (2,9).
- Apparatus according to claim 6, wherein said software means comprises means for storing the profile versus time of said yarn (2,9) as projected onto said sensor means (8) and means for subtracting said stored profile from the real image of said yarn (2,9) as projected on said sensor means (8), said defects being obtained from the comparison of said stored profile with respect to said real image.
- Apparatus according to claims 6 and 7, wherein said software means have a flux of calculus for the reduction of the helix effect of the yarn (2,9) according to the following steps:definition of variables ARRAY(), SUM, and "i", wherein ARRAY() is a vector having N positions and has the function of storing AD values acquired from a analogue to digital converter A/D, SUM is a variable that stores the sum of the values of ARRAY() and "i" is the index of the actual location of ARRAY();initial clearing of the variables ARRAY(), SUM and "i";association of each value of AD to ARRAY(i), and addition thereof to the previous value of SUM and of ARRAY(i);calculus of the mean value Vm of SUM and increment of the index "i", checking that it is not greater than the maximum dimension N of ARRAY();calculus of a value Vo subtracting Vm from AD;comparison of Vo with threshold values indicated with THRESHOLD L, for the defect of "fault" and with THRESHOLD N, for the defect of "burl";repetition of the calculus or operation of the cut of the yarn (2,9) if Vo is external to values THRESHOLD L and THRESHOLD N.
- Method for detecting defects on a yarn (2,9)
characterised in that it comprises the steps of:characterised in thatdragging said yarn (2,9) between a light source (7) and an optical sensor;stretching and pressing said yarn (2,9) on a curved transparent surface (5) located between said light source (7) and said optical sensor, said yarn (2,9) sliding with high speed on said transparent curved surface (5);detecting the shadow projected by said light source (7) onto said optical sensor through said transparent curved surface (5);checking said projected shadow and stopping said dragging at the detection of a said defectsaid step of detecting comprises a step of passage of said shadow through a slit (17) transversal to the direction of the yarn (2,9), for increasing the precision of defect recognition. - Method for detecting defects according to claim 9 10, wherein said step of detecting comprises a step of focusing said shadow on said optical sensor.
- Method for detecting defects according to claim 10, wherein said step of analysing said projected shadow comprises the step of storing the profile versus time of said yarn (2,9) as projected on said sensor means (8) and subtracting said stored profile from the real image of said yarn (2,9) as projected onto said sensor means (8), whereby said defects are obtained from the comparison of said stored profile with respect to said real image.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| ITPI980001 | 1998-01-02 | ||
| IT1998PI000001A IT1304528B1 (en) | 1998-01-02 | 1998-01-02 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR THE DETECTION OF YARN DEFECTS IN FASEDI PRODUCTION IN PARTICULAR CHENILLE YARNS. |
| PCT/EP1998/008510 WO1999035075A1 (en) | 1998-01-02 | 1998-12-30 | Method and apparatus for detecting yarn defects during production, in particular chenille yarns |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| EP1042208A1 EP1042208A1 (en) | 2000-10-11 |
| EP1042208B1 true EP1042208B1 (en) | 2002-09-18 |
Family
ID=11394196
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP98966419A Expired - Lifetime EP1042208B1 (en) | 1998-01-02 | 1998-12-30 | Method and apparatus for detecting yarn defects during production, in particular chenille yarns |
Country Status (8)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| EP (1) | EP1042208B1 (en) |
| AU (1) | AU2276999A (en) |
| DE (1) | DE69808137T2 (en) |
| HU (1) | HUP0100040A2 (en) |
| IT (1) | IT1304528B1 (en) |
| PL (1) | PL188682B1 (en) |
| TR (1) | TR200002006T2 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO1999035075A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP1359108A1 (en) * | 2002-04-30 | 2003-11-05 | Seltec srl | Method and compact device for detection of defects of yarns during production, in particular chenille yarns |
| ITFI20030069U1 (en) * | 2003-07-25 | 2005-01-26 | Giesse Srl | MACHINE FOR PRODUCING FILES OF CINIGLIA |
| DE10348689A1 (en) * | 2003-10-16 | 2005-05-19 | Saurer Gmbh & Co. Kg | Process for producing a fancy yarn |
| DE10352429A1 (en) * | 2003-11-10 | 2005-06-23 | Saurer Gmbh & Co. Kg | yarn clearer |
| DE102004003032A1 (en) * | 2004-01-21 | 2005-08-11 | Saurer Gmbh & Co. Kg | Process for producing a fancy yarn |
| ITMI20040252A1 (en) * | 2004-02-16 | 2004-05-16 | Tiziano Barea | DEVICE FOR THE OPTICAL ANALYSIS EVEN TWO DIMENSIONAL OF A THREAD OR YARN |
| CA2472865C (en) * | 2004-06-29 | 2015-11-17 | Instrumar Limited | Fibre monitoring apparatus and method |
| US7983785B2 (en) | 2004-06-30 | 2011-07-19 | Instrumar Limited | Fibre monitoring apparatus and method |
| WO2020214107A1 (en) * | 2019-04-17 | 2020-10-22 | Alya Teksti̇l Sanayi̇ Ti̇caret Li̇mi̇ted Şi̇rketi̇ | Device for clearing yarn faults |
Family Cites Families (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4341958A (en) * | 1979-08-21 | 1982-07-27 | Ohsawa Shiujia | Yarn-break/yarn-stop detecting device |
| JPS6337082A (en) * | 1986-07-30 | 1988-02-17 | Gunze Ltd | Thread run monitor |
| DE4122305B4 (en) * | 1991-07-05 | 2006-01-12 | Sipra Patententwicklungs- Und Beteiligungsgesellschaft Mbh | Device for optoelectronic scanning of a thread |
| CH686779A5 (en) * | 1993-10-29 | 1996-06-28 | Luwa Ag Zellweger | Apparatus for checking the winding quality of yarn packages and use of the device at a spooling or spinning machine. |
-
1998
- 1998-01-02 IT IT1998PI000001A patent/IT1304528B1/en active
- 1998-12-30 TR TR2000/02006T patent/TR200002006T2/en unknown
- 1998-12-30 EP EP98966419A patent/EP1042208B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-12-30 HU HU0100040A patent/HUP0100040A2/en unknown
- 1998-12-30 DE DE69808137T patent/DE69808137T2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1998-12-30 WO PCT/EP1998/008510 patent/WO1999035075A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1998-12-30 PL PL98341517A patent/PL188682B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1998-12-30 AU AU22769/99A patent/AU2276999A/en not_active Abandoned
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| PL188682B1 (en) | 2005-03-31 |
| TR200002006T2 (en) | 2001-07-23 |
| PL341517A1 (en) | 2001-04-23 |
| DE69808137T2 (en) | 2003-05-28 |
| IT1304528B1 (en) | 2001-03-19 |
| HUP0100040A2 (en) | 2001-06-28 |
| AU2276999A (en) | 1999-07-26 |
| DE69808137D1 (en) | 2002-10-24 |
| ITPI980001A1 (en) | 1999-07-02 |
| EP1042208A1 (en) | 2000-10-11 |
| ITPI980001A0 (en) | 1998-01-02 |
| WO1999035075A1 (en) | 1999-07-15 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| EP1042208B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for detecting yarn defects during production, in particular chenille yarns | |
| EP2883825B1 (en) | Method for operating a winding machine and a winding machine | |
| US4058962A (en) | Method and apparatus for detecting periodic yarn irregularities in a yarn between a yarn forming stage and a yarn winding stage | |
| EP3947793B1 (en) | Method of contactless optical detection of yarn at a workstation of a yarn manufacturing textile machine, an optical sensor of yarn and a textile machine | |
| EP1143236B1 (en) | Process and device for optical detection of impurities, especially fibres, in advancing yarn | |
| JP3238506B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for detecting impurities, especially foreign fibers, in elongated textile structures | |
| US4866289A (en) | Winding-form inspecting apparatus for wound-yarn packages | |
| WO2008012093A2 (en) | Method and arrangement for determining the yarn quality and/or spool quality of a running thread based on laser-doppler anemometry | |
| JP2010078427A (en) | Device for detecting foreign matter, and textile machinery and method for detecting foreign material | |
| JP4045444B2 (en) | Spinning yarn winding device | |
| EP1359108A1 (en) | Method and compact device for detection of defects of yarns during production, in particular chenille yarns | |
| JP2003155658A (en) | Monitoring of yarn | |
| GB2387434A (en) | Detecting and localising yarn defects in a moving yarn sheet | |
| EP3569538A1 (en) | Yarn cutting controlling device, yarn monitoring device, and yarn winding device | |
| EP1521085A1 (en) | Method and device for contactless determination of the speed of a running thread of yarn | |
| US5547138A (en) | Bobbin winding method and winding machines for yarn winding after controlled cutting of the yarn | |
| JP4089057B2 (en) | Film edge thickness measuring apparatus and film edge thickness measuring method | |
| US7551284B2 (en) | Method and device for the optical monitoring of a running fiber strand | |
| EP1238937B1 (en) | Method and device for clearing yarn by cutting out defects | |
| JPH0593326A (en) | Apparatus for detecting yarn defect mainly at joint part of yarn | |
| JPH062232A (en) | Method for sensing yarn breakage and yarn breakage sensor | |
| JPH05310370A (en) | Wound state monitoring method | |
| EP1518469B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for inspecting a rod of material of the tobacco industry | |
| DE102005011223A1 (en) | Bobbin orientation indicator for feeder on automatic winder uses a plane light beam produced by cylindrical lenses and a slit aperture to produce a reflected image on a sensor | |
| JPH0617340A (en) | Fiber breakage detector |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
| 17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20000801 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): BE DE ES FR GB IT NL PT |
|
| AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Free format text: RO PAYMENT 20000801 |
|
| GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
| 17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20010725 |
|
| GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
| GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
| GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
| GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
| GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): BE DE ES FR GB IT NL PT |
|
| AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Free format text: RO PAYMENT 20000801 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20020918 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20020918 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20020918 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
| REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 69808137 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20021024 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20021219 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20021230 |
|
| NLV1 | Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act | ||
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20030328 |
|
| EN | Fr: translation not filed | ||
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20030701 |
|
| PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
| GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20021230 |
|
| 26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20030619 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20111229 Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20131231 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20131230 |