[go: up one dir, main page]

JP2000205213A - Method of joining high strength steel sheet with excellent fatigue properties and high strength steel sheet for joining - Google Patents

Method of joining high strength steel sheet with excellent fatigue properties and high strength steel sheet for joining

Info

Publication number
JP2000205213A
JP2000205213A JP11007161A JP716199A JP2000205213A JP 2000205213 A JP2000205213 A JP 2000205213A JP 11007161 A JP11007161 A JP 11007161A JP 716199 A JP716199 A JP 716199A JP 2000205213 A JP2000205213 A JP 2000205213A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
steel sheet
strength
strength steel
joining
rivet
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP11007161A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP3958883B2 (en
Inventor
Hatsuhiko Oikawa
初彦 及川
Masahiro Obara
昌弘 小原
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Nippon Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Steel Corp filed Critical Nippon Steel Corp
Priority to JP00716199A priority Critical patent/JP3958883B2/en
Publication of JP2000205213A publication Critical patent/JP2000205213A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3958883B2 publication Critical patent/JP3958883B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Connection Of Plates (AREA)
  • Insertion Pins And Rivets (AREA)

Abstract

(57)【要約】 【課題】 疲労特性に優れた高強度鋼板の接合方法とこ
の接合に用いる高強度鋼板を提供する。 【解決手段】 引張強さが490〜1000MPa で、オ
ーステナイト、マルテンサイト、ベイナイトの1種以上
の組織とフェライト組織を含む複合組織を有する高強度
鋼板を被接合材とし、重ね合わせた該被接合材にリベッ
トを打ち込んで機械的に接合することを特徴とし、この
接合方法および接合用材料を用いれば、従来一般に用い
られてきたスポット溶接法に比べて高強度鋼板の接合部
で高い疲労強度が得られる。
(57) [Problem] To provide a joining method of a high-strength steel sheet excellent in fatigue characteristics and a high-strength steel sheet used for this joining. SOLUTION: A high-strength steel sheet having a tensile strength of 490 to 1000 MPa and a composite structure including at least one of austenite, martensite, and bainite and a ferrite structure is used as a material to be joined, and the material to be joined is overlapped. This method is characterized by using rivets and mechanical joining to achieve high fatigue strength at the joints of high-strength steel sheets, compared to the spot welding method generally used conventionally. Can be

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、車体の軽量化、衝
突安全特性向上を目的として用いられる高強度鋼板の接
合方法およびこの接合に用いる高強度鋼板に関するもの
である。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a method for joining high-strength steel sheets used for the purpose of reducing the weight of a vehicle body and improving collision safety characteristics, and a high-strength steel sheet used for the joining.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】最近、大気中でのCO2 の増加による地
球の温暖化が環境問題として大きく取り上げられるよう
になり、自動車、鉄道車両、船舶、などを軽量化し、C
2 の排出量を軽減させようという動きがある。このよ
うな動きに対応して、自動車分野では、高強度鋼板を用
いることにより板厚を低減し、車体の重量を低減させよ
うという試みが成されている。一方、これとは別に、最
近、自動車の衝突安全特性の問題が大きくクローズアッ
プされるようになり、衝突安全特性を向上させるため
に、高強度鋼板を適用することが検討されている。この
ように、自動車分野においては、高強度鋼板に対するニ
ーズが高まっているが、高強度鋼板の溶接では、以下の
ような問題がある。
2. Description of the Related Art Recently, global warming due to an increase in CO 2 in the atmosphere has come to be taken up as an environmental problem.
There is a movement to reduce the amount of O 2 emission. In response to such movements, in the field of automobiles, attempts have been made to reduce the thickness of the vehicle body by using a high-strength steel plate and reduce the weight of the vehicle body. On the other hand, separately from this, recently, the problem of the collision safety characteristics of automobiles has come to be greatly highlighted, and application of a high-strength steel plate has been studied in order to improve the collision safety characteristics. As described above, in the field of automobiles, needs for high-strength steel sheets are increasing. However, welding of high-strength steel sheets has the following problems.

【0003】従来、自動車の組立行程では、スポット溶
接が主に使われており、高強度鋼板の溶接でもスポット
溶接が使われている。鋼板同士をスポット溶接した場
合、鋼板の引張強さが増加すると継手の引張せん断強さ
も増加する。しかし、継手の引張せん断方向の疲労強度
は、鋼板の引張強さが増加しても、ほとんど増加しない
のである。例を上げるなら、引張強さが290MPa の軟
鋼板の代わりに、引張強さが590MPa の高強度鋼板を
用いれば、スポット溶接継手の引張せん断強さはほぼ2
倍になるが、引張せん断方向の疲労強度(例えば、2×
106 回における疲労強度)は2倍にはならず、軟鋼板
の場合とほぼ同じ値を示すのである。これは、従来、報
告されているように、スポット溶接部のノッチ形状が原
因であるものと考えられる。
[0003] Conventionally, spot welding is mainly used in the assembly process of automobiles, and spot welding is also used in welding high-strength steel sheets. When the steel plates are spot-welded, if the tensile strength of the steel plates increases, the tensile shear strength of the joint also increases. However, the fatigue strength in the tensile shear direction of the joint hardly increases even if the tensile strength of the steel sheet increases. To give an example, if a high-strength steel sheet with a tensile strength of 590 MPa is used instead of a mild steel sheet with a tensile strength of 290 MPa, the tensile shear strength of a spot welded joint will be almost 2
Although it is doubled, the fatigue strength in the tensile shear direction (for example, 2 ×
Fatigue strength at 10 6 times) should not doubled, it exhibits almost the same value as that of mild steel plate. This is thought to be due to the notch shape of the spot weld as previously reported.

【0004】すなわち、図1に示すように、鋼板1の間
に存在するナゲット(溶接部)2の部分がノッチ形状に
なっているため、引張せん断方向(矢印方向)に負荷さ
れて疲労試験を行った場合、引張強さの高い鋼板を用い
ても、このノッチ効果によって疲労強度が向上しないの
である。特に、高強度鋼板を用いた場合には、軟鋼板を
用いた場合に比べて、ナゲット部の硬さが増加するた
め、このノッチ効果は顕著になる。負荷の方向が剥離方
向(矢印と垂直な方向)になっても、この傾向は同じで
あり、この場合には、ナゲット部で応力集中が起こるた
め、引張せん断方向に比べて、疲労強度の値が低下す
る。
That is, as shown in FIG. 1, since a portion of a nugget (welded portion) 2 existing between steel plates 1 has a notch shape, a fatigue test is performed by applying a load in a tensile shear direction (arrow direction). In this case, even if a steel plate having a high tensile strength is used, the fatigue strength is not improved by the notch effect. In particular, when a high-strength steel sheet is used, the hardness of the nugget part is increased as compared with the case where a mild steel sheet is used, so that the notch effect is remarkable. This tendency is the same even when the load direction is the peeling direction (the direction perpendicular to the arrow). In this case, the stress concentration occurs at the nugget part, so that the fatigue strength value is lower than the tensile shear direction. Decrease.

【0005】高強度鋼板のスポット溶接部の疲労強度を
向上させる手段としては、例えば、鉄と鋼、68巻(1
982年)第9号、P1444〜P1451にあるよう
に、スポット溶接後にテンパー通電を行うことによって
ナゲット部を焼鈍し、また、残留応力を変化させ、スポ
ット溶接部の疲労強度を向上させる方法が知られてい
る。しかし、この方法では、最適なテンパー通電の条件
が非常に狭く、再現性が乏しいという問題がある。ま
た、めっき鋼板を連続的に打点した時のように、打点数
の増加に伴って、めっきと電極との合金化反応によって
電極先端が劣化し、電極先端径が増大するような場合に
は、電流密度が低下して通電状況が変化するため、最適
な通電条件からずれて、継手の疲労強度が向上しないと
いう問題もある。
[0005] Means for improving the fatigue strength of the spot-welded portion of a high-strength steel plate include, for example, iron and steel, Vol. 68 (1).
982) No. 9, P1444 to P1451, a method of annealing a nugget part by applying a tempering current after spot welding and changing a residual stress to improve the fatigue strength of the spot welded part is known. Have been. However, in this method, there is a problem that the optimum conditions for the tempering are very narrow and the reproducibility is poor. Further, as in the case where a plated steel sheet is continuously hit, as the number of hit points increases, the electrode tip deteriorates due to an alloying reaction between the plating and the electrode, and when the electrode tip diameter increases, Since the current density decreases and the energization state changes, there is also a problem that the fatigue strength of the joint is not improved due to deviation from the optimal energization condition.

【0006】一方、上記で述べたテンパー通電を行う方
法とは別に、図2に示すように、重ね合わせた2枚の高
強度鋼板1にリベット3を打ち込んで両者を機械的に接
合し、継手の疲労強度を向上させる方法が、Hahn.O. an
d Schulte.A.:Europaische Forschungsgesellschaft fu
r Blechverarbeitung, Band T17, EFB-Kolloquim, Leic
htbau d. intelligente Blechverarbeitung, Fellbach,
1997.と、 Hahn.O.,Kurzok.J.R. and Schulte.A.:Tagu
ngsband,,Innovative Fugetechniken fur Leichbaukons
truktionen, 7-8, November, 1996 in Paderborn, Freu
ndeskreis desLaboratoriums fur Werkstoff-und Fuget
echnik e.V.,Paderborn, 1997.で知られている。しか
し、この方法では、リベットを打ち込むために、ダイス
側での鋼板の変形が非常に厳しくなり、高強度鋼板のダ
イス側で割れが発生するという問題がある。また、2×
106 回における疲労強度を比較すると、スポット溶接
に比べれば、リベット打ち込み方式による接合の方が疲
労強度は高くなるが、同じリベット打ち込み方式の継手
で高強度鋼板と軟鋼板の疲労強度を比べると、ほとんど
差がない(約1.1倍程度向上)という問題がある。
On the other hand, separately from the above-described method of conducting the tempering, as shown in FIG. 2, a rivet 3 is driven into two superposed high-strength steel sheets 1 to mechanically join the two, and a joint is formed. Hahn.O. an
d Schulte.A .: Europaische Forschungsgesellschaft fu
r Blechverarbeitung, Band T17, EFB-Kolloquim, Leic
htbau d. intelligente Blechverarbeitung, Fellbach,
1997. and Hahn.O., Kurzok.JR and Schulte.A.:Tagu
ngsband ,, Innovative Fugetechniken fur Leichbaukons
truktionen, 7-8, November, 1996 in Paderborn, Freu
ndeskreis desLaboratoriums fur Werkstoff-und Fuget
echnik eV, Paderborn, 1997. However, in this method, since the rivet is driven, the deformation of the steel sheet on the die side becomes extremely severe, and there is a problem that cracks occur on the die side of the high-strength steel sheet. Also, 2 ×
10 Comparing the fatigue strength at 6 times, compared to the spot welding, the fatigue strength towards the joining by riveting system is high, at the joint of the same riveting system than the fatigue strength of high-strength steel sheet and mild steel plate And there is almost no difference (about 1.1 times improvement).

【0007】[0007]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】上記のように、軟鋼板
の代わりに高強度鋼板を用いても、継手の疲労強度は向
上しない。したがって、高強度鋼板の板厚を薄くして軽
量化するためには、溶接点数を増やすことが必要とな
る。しかし、これは生産時間の増加を招き、ひいては、
コスト上昇の原因となる。また、設計の自由度もかなり
制限されるものと考えられる。本発明は、このような問
題を解決しようとしたものであり、疲労特性に優れた高
強度鋼板の接合方法とその方法に適した高強度鋼板を提
供するものである。
As described above, even if a high-strength steel sheet is used instead of a mild steel sheet, the fatigue strength of the joint is not improved. Therefore, it is necessary to increase the number of welding points in order to make the high-strength steel sheet thinner and lighter. However, this leads to an increase in production time and, consequently,
It causes cost increase. Also, the degree of freedom in design is considered to be considerably limited. The present invention has been made to solve such a problem, and provides a joining method of a high-strength steel sheet having excellent fatigue characteristics and a high-strength steel sheet suitable for the method.

【0008】[0008]

【課題を解決するための手段】高強度鋼板の接合部の疲
労強度を向上させる方法としては、大きく分けて2つあ
る。すなわち、スポット溶接後にテンパー通電を行う方
法とリベットを打ち込んで機械的に接合する方法であ
る。前者の方法は、電極の劣化とともに、テンパー通電
条件が変化するため、再現性良く疲労強度を向上させる
ことは難しいものと考えられる。一方、後者の方法は、
ナゲット部のノッチ効果が無くなるため、疲労強度を向
上させる方法としてはかなり期待が持てる。したがっ
て、上記2つの方法の内、再現性良く疲労強度を向上さ
せるためには、後者の方法を用いる方が望ましいものと
考えられる。一方、リベット打ち込み方式の機械的接合
法で継手の疲労強度を向上させるためには、リベットを
打ち込んだ際にダイス側で割れが発生しないような、こ
の方式に適した高強度鋼板を用いることが重要であるも
のと考えられる。
Means for Solving the Problems There are roughly two methods for improving the fatigue strength at the joint of high strength steel sheets. In other words, there are a method in which tempering is performed after spot welding and a method in which rivets are driven and mechanically joined. In the former method, it is considered that it is difficult to improve the fatigue strength with good reproducibility because the tempering condition changes with the deterioration of the electrode. On the other hand, the latter method
Since the notch effect of the nugget part is lost, there is considerable expectation as a method for improving the fatigue strength. Therefore, in order to improve the fatigue strength with good reproducibility among the above two methods, it is considered that the latter method is more preferable. On the other hand, in order to improve the fatigue strength of the joint by the rivet driving mechanical joining method, it is necessary to use a high-strength steel sheet suitable for this method so that cracks do not occur on the die side when driving rivets. It is considered important.

【0009】このような観点から、高強度鋼板の継手の
疲労強度を向上させるために、本発明者らは鋭意研究を
重ねた結果、被接合材として複合組織鋼板を用い、これ
にリベットを打ち込んで機械的に接合することにより、
継手の疲労強度を向上させ得ることを見い出した。
From such a viewpoint, the present inventors have conducted intensive studies in order to improve the fatigue strength of a joint of a high-strength steel sheet. As a result, the present inventors have used a composite structure steel sheet as a material to be joined, and set rivets into it. By mechanically joining with
It has been found that the fatigue strength of the joint can be improved.

【0010】すなわち、本発明の要旨とするところは、 (1) 引張強さが490〜1000MPa で、オーステ
ナイト、マルテンサイト、ベイナイトの1種以上の組織
とフェライト組織を含む複合組織を有する高強度鋼板を
被接合材とし、重ね合わせた該被接合材にリベットを打
ち込んで機械的に接合することを特徴とする疲労特性に
優れた高強度鋼板の接合方法。 (2) 0.2%耐力、引張強さ、ビッカース硬さの値
が下記の式で表されるリベットを用いることを特徴とす
る前記(1)に記載の疲労特性に優れた高強度鋼板の接
合方法。 1.2YP0.2M≦YP0.2R≦2.5YP0.2M 1.2TSM ≦TSR ≦2.5TSM 1.2HvM ≦HvR ≦2.5HvM ただし、 YP0.2M:被接合材の0.2%耐力、YP0.2R:リベッ
トの0.2%耐力 TSM :被接合材の引張強さ、 TSR :リベット
の引張強さ HvM :被接合材のビッカース硬さ、HvR :リベット
のビッカース硬さ (3) 前記(1)または(2)に記載の接合方法に用
いる高強度鋼板であって、引張強さが490〜1000
MPa で、オーステナイト、マルテンサイト、ベイナイト
の1種以上の組織とフェライト組織を含む複合組織を有
するリベット接合用高強度鋼板。である。
That is, the gist of the present invention is as follows: (1) A high-strength steel sheet having a tensile strength of 490 to 1000 MPa and a composite structure including at least one of austenite, martensite, and bainite and a ferrite structure. A method for joining high-strength steel sheets excellent in fatigue characteristics, wherein rivets are driven into the joined joined members and mechanically joined. (2) A high-strength steel sheet having excellent fatigue properties according to (1), wherein a rivet having a 0.2% proof stress, a tensile strength, and a Vickers hardness value represented by the following formula is used. Joining method. 1.2YP 0.2M ≤YP 0.2R ≤2.5YP 0.2M 1.2TS M ≤TS R ≤2.5TS M 1.2Hv M ≤Hv R ≤2.5Hv M where YP 0.2M : 0 of the material to be joined .2% proof stress, YP 0.2R : 0.2% proof stress of rivet TS M : Tensile strength of material to be joined, TS R : Tensile strength of rivet Hv M : Vickers hardness of material to be joined, Hv R : Rivet (3) A high-strength steel sheet used in the joining method according to (1) or (2), wherein the tensile strength is 490 to 1000.
A high-strength steel sheet for rivet bonding having a composite structure including at least one of austenite, martensite, and bainite and a ferrite structure at MPa. It is.

【0011】[0011]

【発明の実施の形態】次に、図面を用いて、本発明に係
る接合方法およびこれに用いる接合用材料について、作
用とともに具体的に説明する。図2は、本発明に係る機
械的接合方法を説明するための図である。図2(a)に
示したように、被接合材である2枚の高強度鋼板1を重
ね合わせ、ポンチ4でリベット3を上方から打ち込み、
打ち込み時にダイス5でリベット3の先端を図2(b)
のように変形させ、2枚の高強度鋼板を機械的に接合す
る。
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS The joining method according to the present invention and the joining material used in the joining method according to the present invention will be specifically described below with reference to the drawings. FIG. 2 is a diagram for explaining the mechanical joining method according to the present invention. As shown in FIG. 2 (a), two high-strength steel sheets 1, which are materials to be joined, are overlapped, and a rivet 3 is driven from above with a punch 4,
The tip of the rivet 3 is set with the die 5 at the time of driving, as shown in FIG.
And mechanically join the two high-strength steel sheets.

【0012】機械的接合に用いるリベットの材質として
は、被接合材である高強度鋼板より0.2%耐力、引張
強さ、硬さの値が高いものであれば良い。すなわち、そ
れぞれの値が下記の式を満たすものであれば良い。 1.2YP0.2M≦YP0.2R≦2.5YP0.2M 1.2TSM ≦TSR ≦2.5TSM 1.2HvM ≦HvR ≦2.5HvM ただし、 YP0.2M:被接合材の0.2%耐力、YP0.2R:リベッ
トの0.2%耐力 TSM :被接合材の引張強さ、 TSR :リベット
の引張強さ HvM :被接合材のビッカース硬さ、HvR :リベット
のビッカース硬さ
The material of the rivet used for mechanical joining may be any material as long as it has a 0.2% proof stress, tensile strength, and hardness higher than that of a high-strength steel plate as a material to be joined. That is, it is sufficient that each value satisfies the following equation. 1.2YP 0.2M ≤YP 0.2R ≤2.5YP 0.2M 1.2TS M ≤TS R ≤2.5TS M 1.2Hv M ≤Hv R ≤2.5Hv M where YP 0.2M : 0 of the material to be joined .2% proof stress, YP 0.2R : 0.2% proof stress of rivet TS M : Tensile strength of material to be joined, TS R : Tensile strength of rivet Hv M : Vickers hardness of material to be joined, Hv R : Rivet Vickers hardness

【0013】0.2%耐力、引張強さ、硬さの値を上記
の値以上に設定したのは、打ち込み時にリベットが破断
しないように確実に高強度鋼板を打ち抜くためであり、
また、疲労試験時にリベットで破断が起こらないように
するためである。また、0.2%耐力、引張強さ、硬さ
の値を上記の値以下に設定したのは、あまり強度の高い
リベットを用いると、打ち込み時やダイス側での変形時
にリベットで割れが発生するからである。具体的な材質
としては、炭素鋼(S45C、SK4、など)や複合組
織鋼(2相組織鋼、TRIP鋼)などを用いれば良い。
リベットの直径(鋼板に打ち込まれる部分の直径)と長
さは、高強度鋼板の板厚によって適宜選択すれば良い
が、直径3〜6mm、長さ4〜14mm程度のものを用いれ
ば良い。ダイスの形状としては、リベットで割れが生じ
ない形状であれば良い。
The values of the 0.2% proof stress, tensile strength, and hardness are set to be equal to or more than the above values in order to reliably punch a high-strength steel sheet so that the rivet does not break at the time of driving.
It is also to prevent the rivet from breaking during the fatigue test. Also, the values of 0.2% proof stress, tensile strength, and hardness were set to the above values or less because if rivets with too high strength were used, cracks occurred in the rivets during driving or deformation on the die side. Because you do. As a specific material, carbon steel (S45C, SK4, etc.), composite structure steel (two-phase structure steel, TRIP steel) or the like may be used.
The diameter of the rivet (the diameter of the portion to be driven into the steel plate) and the length may be appropriately selected according to the thickness of the high-strength steel plate, and a rivet having a diameter of about 3 to 6 mm and a length of about 4 to 14 mm may be used. The shape of the die may be any shape as long as it does not crack with rivets.

【0014】本発明で用いる高強度鋼板は、オーステナ
イト、マルテンサイト、ベイナイトの1種以上の組織と
フェライト組織を含む複合組織を有する鋼板である。具
体的には、フェライト中にマルテンサイトを含む2相組
織鋼(Dual Phase鋼)、フェライト中に残留
オーステナイトを含む加工誘起変態型の高残留オーステ
ナイト鋼(TRIP鋼)、フェライト中にベイナイトを
含む高バーリング鋼、などが上げられる。機械的特性と
しては、引張強さが、490〜1000MPa のものであ
る。複合組織鋼板は延性に優れているため、リベット打
ち込み時に、ダイス側で割れが発生し難い。したがっ
て、その他の機械的特性については特に制限を設けない
が、リベット打ち込み時におけるダイス側での割れの発
生を出来るだけ回避するため、伸び、r値は高い方が望
ましい。製造法は、熱間圧延法でも冷間圧延法でも良
い。板厚は一般的に自動車などで使う鋼板の板厚、例え
ば、0.4mm〜4.0mm程度で良い。
The high-strength steel sheet used in the present invention is a steel sheet having a composite structure including at least one of austenite, martensite, and bainite and a ferrite structure. Specifically, a dual phase steel containing martensite in ferrite (Dual Phase steel), a work-induced transformation type high residual austenitic steel containing retained austenite in ferrite (TRIP steel), and a high phase containing bainite in ferrite. Burring steel, etc. are raised. The mechanical properties are those having a tensile strength of 490 to 1000 MPa. Since the composite structure steel sheet is excellent in ductility, cracks hardly occur on the die side during rivet driving. Therefore, other mechanical properties are not particularly limited, but it is desirable that the elongation and the r-value are high in order to avoid cracks on the die side during rivet driving as much as possible. The manufacturing method may be a hot rolling method or a cold rolling method. The plate thickness may be generally the thickness of a steel plate used in an automobile or the like, for example, about 0.4 mm to 4.0 mm.

【0015】[0015]

【実施例】(実施例1)被接合材として、表1に示した
厚さ1.0mmの6種類の高強度鋼板と1種類の軟鋼板
(試験片形状:40×150mm)を用いた。この鋼板
を、同種材同士の組み合わせで、ラップしろ40mmで重
ね合わせ、図2に示した要領で、直径5.0mm、長さ
6.0mmのリベット(材質;SK4)を片面から打ち込
み、逆側のダイスでリベットを変形させて機械的に接合
した。また、比較のため、これらの鋼板をナゲット径が
5.0mmになる条件でスポット溶接した。
EXAMPLES (Example 1) Six types of high-strength steel sheets having a thickness of 1.0 mm and one type of mild steel sheet (test piece shape: 40 × 150 mm) shown in Table 1 were used as materials to be joined. This steel plate is overlapped with a combination of similar materials with a lap margin of 40 mm, and a rivet (material: SK4) having a diameter of 5.0 mm and a length of 6.0 mm is driven from one side in the manner shown in FIG. The rivet was deformed with a die and mechanically joined. For comparison, these steel sheets were spot-welded under the condition that the nugget diameter became 5.0 mm.

【0016】これらの継手について、JIS引張せん断
疲労試験法に基づき疲労試験を実施した。疲労試験は片
振り試験で行い、応力比;0.05、周波数;5Hzの
条件で行った。2×106 回における疲労強度を表1に
示す。スポット溶接では、鋼板の強度が増加しても、疲
労強度は増加していない。一方、固溶型、Nb析出型、
Ti析出型の高強度鋼板を用いた場合には、機械的接合
を用いても、疲労強度の上昇はわずかであった。これに
対して、2相組織鋼板、TRIP鋼板、高バーリング鋼
板を用いた場合には、機械的接合法を用いることによ
り、継手の疲労強度は、大幅に向上した。板厚2.0mm
の鋼板を用いて同様の検討を行ったが。結果は同じであ
った。
The joints were subjected to a fatigue test based on the JIS tensile shear fatigue test method. The fatigue test was performed by a swing test, and the stress ratio was 0.05 and the frequency was 5 Hz. Table 1 shows the fatigue strength at 2 × 10 6 times. In spot welding, even if the strength of the steel sheet increases, the fatigue strength does not increase. On the other hand, solid solution type, Nb precipitation type,
In the case of using a high-strength steel sheet of a Ti precipitation type, the increase in fatigue strength was slight even when mechanical joining was used. On the other hand, when a two-phase steel sheet, a TRIP steel sheet, or a high burring steel sheet was used, the fatigue strength of the joint was significantly improved by using the mechanical joining method. 2.0mm thickness
A similar study was conducted using steel plates. The results were the same.

【0017】[0017]

【表1】 [Table 1]

【0018】(実施例2)表2に示した、実施例1と同
じ鋼板(試験片形状:50×150mm)を、同種材同士
の組み合わせで十字型に重ね合わせ、直径;5.0mm、
長さ;6.0mmのリベット(材質;SK4)を片面から
打ち込み、逆側のダイスでリベットを変形させて機械的
に接合した。また、比較のため、これらの鋼板をナゲッ
ト径が5.0mmになる条件でスポット溶接した。これら
の継手について、JIS十字引張疲労試験法に基づき疲
労試験を実施した。なお、疲労試験の条件は、第1の実
施例と同様である。2×106 回における疲労強度を表
2に示す。スポット溶接では、鋼板の強度が増加して
も、疲労強度は増加していない。一方、固溶型、Nb析
出型、Ti析出型の高強度鋼板を用いた場合には、機械
的接合を用いても、疲労強度の上昇はわずかであった。
これに対して、2相組織鋼板、TRIP鋼板、高バーリ
ング鋼板を用いた場合には、機械的接合を用いることに
より、継手の疲労強度は、大幅に向上した。板厚2.0
mmの鋼板を用いて同様の検討を行ったが結果は同じであ
った。
Example 2 The same steel plate (test piece shape: 50 × 150 mm) shown in Table 2 as in Example 1 was overlapped in a cross shape with a combination of similar materials, and had a diameter of 5.0 mm.
A rivet (material: SK4) having a length of 6.0 mm was driven in from one side, and the rivet was deformed with a die on the opposite side and mechanically joined. For comparison, these steel sheets were spot-welded under the condition that the nugget diameter became 5.0 mm. These joints were subjected to a fatigue test based on the JIS cross tensile fatigue test method. The conditions of the fatigue test are the same as in the first embodiment. Table 2 shows the fatigue strength at 2 × 10 6 times. In spot welding, even if the strength of the steel sheet increases, the fatigue strength does not increase. On the other hand, when a solid solution type, Nb precipitation type, or Ti precipitation type high-strength steel sheet was used, the increase in fatigue strength was slight even when mechanical joining was used.
On the other hand, when a two-phase structure steel plate, a TRIP steel plate, or a high burring steel plate was used, the fatigue strength of the joint was significantly improved by using mechanical joining. Sheet thickness 2.0
A similar study was conducted using a steel plate of mm, but the results were the same.

【0019】[0019]

【表2】 [Table 2]

【0020】[0020]

【発明の効果】以上説明した本発明の接合方法および接
合用材料を用いれば、従来一般に用いられてきたスポッ
ト溶接法に比べて高強度鋼板の接合部で高い疲労強度が
得られる。
By using the joining method and the joining material of the present invention described above, a higher fatigue strength can be obtained in the joint portion of a high-strength steel sheet as compared with the conventionally generally used spot welding method.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】スポット溶接部の疲労試験時における破壊の例
を説明するための断面図である。
FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view for explaining an example of destruction during a fatigue test of a spot weld.

【図2】本発明における接合方法の一例を説明するため
の断面図で、(a)はリベット打ち込み開始時、(b)
はリベット打ち込み後の状態を示している。
FIGS. 2A and 2B are cross-sectional views for explaining an example of a joining method according to the present invention, wherein FIG.
Indicates a state after rivet driving.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

1 高強度鋼板 2 ナゲット 3 リベット 4 ポンチ 5 ダイス DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 High-strength steel plate 2 Nugget 3 Rivet 4 Punch 5 Dice

Claims (3)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 引張強さが490〜1000MPa で、オ
ーステナイト、マルテンサイト、ベイナイトの1種以上
の組織とフェライト組織を含む複合組織を有する高強度
鋼板を被接合材とし、重ね合わせた該被接合材にリベッ
トを打ち込んで機械的に接合することを特徴とする疲労
特性に優れた高強度鋼板の接合方法。
1. A high-strength steel sheet having a tensile strength of 490 to 1000 MPa and a composite structure including at least one of austenite, martensite, and bainite and a ferrite structure is used as a material to be bonded, and the high-strength steel sheet is superposed. A method for joining high-strength steel sheets with excellent fatigue characteristics, characterized in that rivets are driven into the material and mechanically joined.
【請求項2】 0.2%耐力、引張強さ、ビッカース硬
さの値が下記の式で表されるリベットを用いることを特
徴とする請求項1に記載の疲労特性に優れた高強度鋼板
の接合方法。 1.2YP0.2M≦YP0.2R≦2.5YP0.2M 1.2TSM ≦TSR ≦2.5TSM 1.2HvM ≦HvR ≦2.5HvM ただし、 YP0.2M:被接合材の0.2%耐力、YP0.2R:リベッ
トの0.2%耐力 TSM :被接合材の引張強さ、 TSR :リベット
の引張強さ HvM :被接合材のビッカース硬さ、HvR :リベット
のビッカース硬さ
2. A high-strength steel sheet having excellent fatigue properties according to claim 1, wherein a rivet having a value of 0.2% proof stress, tensile strength and Vickers hardness represented by the following formula is used. Joining method. 1.2YP 0.2M ≤YP 0.2R ≤2.5YP 0.2M 1.2TS M ≤TS R ≤2.5TS M 1.2Hv M ≤Hv R ≤2.5Hv M where YP 0.2M : 0 of the material to be joined .2% proof stress, YP 0.2R : 0.2% proof stress of rivet TS M : Tensile strength of material to be joined, TS R : Tensile strength of rivet Hv M : Vickers hardness of material to be joined, Hv R : Rivet Vickers hardness
【請求項3】 請求項1または2に記載の接合方法に用
いる高強度鋼板であって、引張強さが490〜1000
MPa で、オーステナイト、マルテンサイト、ベイナイト
の1種以上の組織とフェライト組織を含む複合組織を有
するリベット接合用高強度鋼板。
3. A high-strength steel sheet used in the joining method according to claim 1, wherein the high-strength steel sheet has a tensile strength of 490 to 1000.
A high-strength steel sheet for rivet bonding having a composite structure including at least one of austenite, martensite, and bainite and a ferrite structure at MPa.
JP00716199A 1999-01-14 1999-01-14 Bonding method of high strength steel plate with excellent fatigue characteristics Expired - Fee Related JP3958883B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP00716199A JP3958883B2 (en) 1999-01-14 1999-01-14 Bonding method of high strength steel plate with excellent fatigue characteristics

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP00716199A JP3958883B2 (en) 1999-01-14 1999-01-14 Bonding method of high strength steel plate with excellent fatigue characteristics

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2000205213A true JP2000205213A (en) 2000-07-25
JP3958883B2 JP3958883B2 (en) 2007-08-15

Family

ID=11658364

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP00716199A Expired - Fee Related JP3958883B2 (en) 1999-01-14 1999-01-14 Bonding method of high strength steel plate with excellent fatigue characteristics

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3958883B2 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2015166111A (en) * 2006-05-13 2015-09-24 ヘンロッブ・リミテッドHenrob Limited Forming method for fastening part using self insertion rivet
CN106964741A (en) * 2017-05-15 2017-07-21 吉林大学 Rivet pulling device and staking method between a kind of alloy sheets and carbon fibre composite plate

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2015166111A (en) * 2006-05-13 2015-09-24 ヘンロッブ・リミテッドHenrob Limited Forming method for fastening part using self insertion rivet
US9364885B2 (en) 2006-05-13 2016-06-14 Henrob Limited Method for forming a joint
CN106964741A (en) * 2017-05-15 2017-07-21 吉林大学 Rivet pulling device and staking method between a kind of alloy sheets and carbon fibre composite plate

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP3958883B2 (en) 2007-08-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5151615B2 (en) Spot welding method for high strength steel sheet
JP6079466B2 (en) Lap welded member of high strength steel plate and method for producing the same
JP6447752B2 (en) Automotive parts having resistance welds
JP6191263B2 (en) Lap welded member and manufacturing method thereof
EP3028799A1 (en) Arc spot weld joint and method for producing same
JP2002161336A (en) Ultra-high tensile cold rolled steel sheet and method for producing the same
WO2020105325A1 (en) Joined structure and method for manufacturing joined structure
JP5429327B2 (en) Spot welding method for high strength steel sheet
JP5168204B2 (en) Spot welding method for steel sheet
JP2006021216A (en) Method for manufacturing tailored blank press molded parts
JP3944046B2 (en) Fatigue strength improvement method of spot welded joint by ultrasonic impact treatment
JP4724535B2 (en) Fatigue strength improvement method for high strength steel spot welded joint
JP2000202563A (en) Joining method of high strength steel sheet with excellent tensile and fatigue properties
JP3828855B2 (en) Method for improving tensile strength of spot welded joints by ultrasonic impact treatment
JP3958883B2 (en) Bonding method of high strength steel plate with excellent fatigue characteristics
JP3875878B2 (en) Spot-welding method for high-strength steel sheets with excellent fatigue strength characteristics of welds
JP2005103608A (en) Methods for improving corrosion resistance, tensile strength and fatigue strength of joints spot-welded high strength plated steel sheets
JP4044434B2 (en) High-strength tailored blank material with excellent deformation characteristics
JP3793244B2 (en) Structural steel welded joints with excellent fatigue strength
JPH11104838A (en) Structural steel welded joint with excellent fatigue strength
WO2021200692A1 (en) Method for manufacturing rivet joint, rivet joint, and rivet for electrical heating
CN118357583B (en) Solder, laser welding joint and manufacturing method thereof
JP7648019B2 (en) Resistance spot welding method and method for manufacturing welded parts
EP4574324A1 (en) Resistance spot welding method
JP5429326B2 (en) Spot welding method for high strength steel sheet

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20060912

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20061212

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20070213

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20070501

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20070511

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100518

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110518

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120518

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130518

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130518

Year of fee payment: 6

S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130518

Year of fee payment: 6

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130518

Year of fee payment: 6

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140518

Year of fee payment: 7

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees