[go: up one dir, main page]

US20080269935A1 - Method and apparatus for quality control of mechanical pieces - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for quality control of mechanical pieces Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20080269935A1
US20080269935A1 US12/100,989 US10098908A US2008269935A1 US 20080269935 A1 US20080269935 A1 US 20080269935A1 US 10098908 A US10098908 A US 10098908A US 2008269935 A1 US2008269935 A1 US 2008269935A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
stations
slow
mechanical
piece
time
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US12/100,989
Other versions
US8096041B2 (en
Inventor
Carlo Agrati
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Dimac Srl
Original Assignee
Dimac Srl
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Dimac Srl filed Critical Dimac Srl
Assigned to DIMAC S.R.L. reassignment DIMAC S.R.L. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: AGRATI, CARLO
Publication of US20080269935A1 publication Critical patent/US20080269935A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US8096041B2 publication Critical patent/US8096041B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/08Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T29/00Metal working
    • Y10T29/49Method of mechanical manufacture
    • Y10T29/49995Shaping one-piece blank by removing material
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T29/00Metal working
    • Y10T29/51Plural diverse manufacturing apparatus including means for metal shaping or assembling
    • Y10T29/5124Plural diverse manufacturing apparatus including means for metal shaping or assembling with means to feed work intermittently from one tool station to another
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T29/00Metal working
    • Y10T29/51Plural diverse manufacturing apparatus including means for metal shaping or assembling
    • Y10T29/5124Plural diverse manufacturing apparatus including means for metal shaping or assembling with means to feed work intermittently from one tool station to another
    • Y10T29/5127Blank turret
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T74/00Machine element or mechanism
    • Y10T74/14Rotary member or shaft indexing, e.g., tool or work turret
    • Y10T74/1488Control means

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates to quality control methods, processes and apparatuses.
  • it relates to a method for quality control of mechanical pieces and a control apparatus for quality control of mechanical pieces.
  • the present disclosure relates to a method for quality control of mechanical pieces, such as screws, pins, pivots and similar, intended for mass-production mechanical industries, such as the automobile and household appliances industries and similar, by means of an apparatus comprising in a casing a plurality of operation stations and a piece-holder table which is pitched revolving to convey the pieces to the operation stations.
  • the present disclosure also relates to a control apparatus for quality control of mechanical pieces, such as screws, pins, pivots and similar, intended for mass-production mechanical industries, such as the automobile and household appliances industries and similar, by means of an apparatus comprising in a casing a plurality of operation stations and a piece-holder table, of which there are operation stations that perform brief operations, so-called fast stations, and operation stations that perform long operations, so-called slow stations.
  • Apparatuses for quality control of mechanical pieces such as bolts and screws and similar are commonly used to select mechanical pieces which do not come within a specific dimensional tolerance.
  • a dimensional tolerance of ⁇ 0.01 mm can be required.
  • control apparatus In order to detect such tolerances, the control apparatus must be provided with operation stations for controlling the mechanical pieces, comprising artificial vision systems, laser sensors, gauges, feeler pins and so on and with a conveyor belt which positions the mechanical piece near each operation station.
  • operation stations for controlling the mechanical pieces comprising artificial vision systems, laser sensors, gauges, feeler pins and so on and with a conveyor belt which positions the mechanical piece near each operation station.
  • the movement of the conveyor belt is programmed so that the mechanical piece transits at an operation station long enough to allow the station to control said piece.
  • the mechanical piece transits in front of all the operation stations and no tolerance defect is detected, the mechanical piece is selected, otherwise it is rejected.
  • Said control apparatuses comprise an operation station where the mechanical pieces are loaded, for example fed by a piece-holder placed outside the automatic machine, a rotating table where the pieces are deposited by means of the loading operation station and a plurality of control operation stations fixed around the rotating table.
  • the number and type of control operation stations can be varied, by mounting or removing control operation stations around the rotating table, according to the space available and the size of the single stations.
  • the table can be rotated at a predetermined angular pitch, i.e. alternating predetermined angular pitch rotations with predetermined time intervals when the rotating table is substantially fixed with respect to the stations.
  • the loading operation station deposits the mechanical pieces, one at a time, on the rotating table so that the piece transits at the control operation stations; the rotating table is programmed so that the piece stops at each station for a predetermined length of time; sufficient to control the dimensional tolerances.
  • Each mechanical piece is either selected or rejected substantially at the end of a rotation of the rotating table, i.e. after stopping for the predetermined time at the control operation stations.
  • the technical problem at the base of the present disclosure is to increase the efficiency of a control apparatus of the above-mentioned type, increasing the number of pieces which can be controlled per time unit and, at the same time, guaranteeing high precision in the control of dimensional tolerances ensuring, therefore, a stopping time for each control operation station sufficient to carry out the corresponding control. More in particular, the technical problem is to increase the efficiency of a control apparatus for all possible configurations of the control operation stations mounted around the rotating table, determining the speed with which the mechanical pieces are positioned on the rotating table according to the number of control operation stations mounted around it and according to the time necessary to carry out the control at each station.
  • the number of slow operation stations is increased, for example by putting a slow operation station beside each slow operation station already positioned along the rotating table, rotating the table at a predetermined pitch and stopping it for different time lengths, activating during the short time intervals only the fast operation stations, for example the loading operation station and, during the long time intervals substantially all the stations, so that the greater operational capacity of the fast operation stations is compensated by the greater number of slow stations.
  • the operation stations to subdivide the operation stations into two groups, a first group comprising operation stations with operation times shorter than the predetermined time, or fast stations, and a second group comprising operation stations with operation times longer than the predetermined time, or slow stations;
  • the technical problem at the base of the present disclosure is also solved by a control apparatus to put the above-described method into effect.
  • the fast operation stations are exploited both during the fast time intervals and during the slow time intervals and the number of mechanical pieces controlled in the time unit is not limited by the operation time of a slow station.
  • the duration of the stopping time of the rotating table can be established according to the number of slow operation stations, the operation speed of said stations and the complexity of the mechanical piece to be controlled, so making it possible to optimize the efficiency with which each piece is controlled for every possible configuration of the operation stations.
  • FIG. 1 represents a plant view of an apparatus according to the present disclosure
  • FIG. 2 schematically represents the apparatus of FIG. 1 ;
  • FIG. 3 schematically represents the apparatus of FIG. 1 in another phase of its functioning
  • FIG. 4 represents, in a flow diagram, the operation phases of the apparatus according to the present disclosure.
  • an apparatus is shown for quality control of mechanical pieces 2 , such as screws, pins, pivots and similar, intended for mass-production mechanical industries, such as such as the automobile and household appliances industries and similar.
  • the apparatus 1 comprises an input channel 3 for moving the mechanical pieces 2 from a loading tank 6 to a rotating table 4 , comprising a guide 4 a for the mechanical pieces 2 .
  • an operation station S 1 intended to load the pieces 2 on the table 4 , removes a piece 2 from the input channel 3 and deposits it in the guide 4 a , in a loading position 4 b.
  • the rotating table 4 can be rotated in such a way as to alternate a predetermined stopping time, during which the operation station S 1 , also called loading station S 1 , loads a mechanical piece 2 into the loading position 4 b , with a rotation of the table 4 at a predetermined pitch, in order to position the mechanical piece 2 at another operation station S 2 , S 4 , for example an artificial vision system, laser sensor or gauge.
  • the operation station S 2 , S 4 where the mechanical piece 2 is positioned, carries out quality control while the loading station S 1 loads another mechanical piece 2 in the loading position 4 b.
  • the operation stations S 1 , S 2 , S 4 have different operation times.
  • the operation station S 1 is a fast station V 1 which requires a short interval of time T 1 to acquire a mechanical piece 2 and deposit it in the loading position 4 b.
  • the operation stations S 2 , S 4 are slow stations L 1 , L 3 and require a long interval of time T 2 compared to the time T 1 to carry out a precise control.
  • the operation stations S 1 , S 2 , S 4 are divided into two groups, a first group comprising operation stations S 1 to be kept active for operation times T 1 shorter than the predetermined time, or fast stations V 1 , and a second group comprising operation stations S 2 , S 4 to be kept active for operation times T 2 longer than the predetermined time, also called slow station L 1 , L 3 .
  • the method of the present disclosure also provides, for each slow station L 1 , L 3 , an equal slow station L 2 , L 4 , placed at said predetermined pitch.
  • the slow stations L 2 , L 4 are additional stations intended to carry out the same type of control as the slow stations L 1 and L 3 .
  • the slow stations L 2 and L 4 are activated at the same time as the slow stations L 1 and L 3 , during the longer operation times T 2 , in order to carry out controls on different mechanical pieces 2 at the same time.
  • the rotating table 4 is set in rotation according to two different stopping times, a first brief stop T 1 and a second longer stop T 2 respectively.
  • the station V 1 is activated to load a mechanical piece 2 in the loading position 4 b , while all the slow stations L 1 , L 2 , L 3 , L 4 are deactivated, since they are not able to carry out a control in the time interval T 1 of the short stop.
  • FIG. 2 represents the rotating table 4 in an initial state where the mechanical piece 2 a is inserted in the loading position 4 b and a second mechanical piece 2 b is ready for insertion from station V 1 .
  • the rotating table 4 moves by a predetermined pitch, to convey the first mechanical piece 2 a , so freeing the loading position 4 b in favor of the piece 2 b , and a short stop T 1 during which the station V 1 deposits the second piece 2 b in the loading position 4 b.
  • the rotating table rotates by another angular pitch, simultaneously positioning the first piece 2 a at the operation station L 2 and the second mechanical piece 2 b at the operation station L 1 , as schematically illustrated in FIG. 2 .
  • the rotating table 4 carries out a long stop T 2 , during which the slow stations L 1 and L 2 carry out the same type of control on two different mechanical pieces, 2 b and 2 a respectively.
  • the loading station is also operative and deposits a third piece 2 c in the loading position 4 b freed by the previous pitch movement.
  • the rotating table 4 At the end of the long stop T 2 , the rotating table 4 first rotates by an angular pitch to move the piece 2 c and free the loading position 4 b in favor of a fourth piece 2 d , then stops for a brief time interval T 1 to load the piece 2 d and, subsequently, rotates another angular pitch to position the pieces 2 c and 2 d at the slow stations L 1 , L 2 respectively.
  • the first piece 2 a and the second 2 b are transported to the slow stations L 3 and L 4 , so that, during the long stop T 2 , while the stations L 1 and L 2 are operating on the third and fourth pieces 2 c and 2 d , the slow stations L 4 and L 3 are operating on the first and second pieces 2 a and 2 b.
  • the method of the present disclosure provides a loading step which comprises depositing at least two mechanical pieces 2 a , 2 b on the guide 4 a of the rotating table 4 , carrying out at least one angular pitch between loading of consecutive pieces and at least one corresponding short stop T 1 to allow the fast station V 1 to load the piece, and a control step comprising a long stop T 2 during which the pieces 2 a , 2 b are simultaneously controlled by the slow stations L 1 , L 2 , L 3 , L 4 .
  • the fast loading station V 1 is not delayed by the slow stations L 1 , L 2 , L 3 , L 4 since the rotating table 4 is rotated, alternately, with a short stop T 1 to exploit the loading speed of the fast station V 1 and a long stop T 2 which gives the slow stations L 1 , L 2 , L 3 , L 4 a time T 2 sufficient to carry out the corresponding control.
  • the method provides for the operation stations to be divided into two groups, a first group comprising operation stations to be kept active for operation times T 1 shorter than a predetermined time, or fast stations, and a second group comprising operation stations to be kept active for operation times longer than said predetermined time, or slow stations.
  • an equal slow station is provided angularly distanced by an uneven number of pitches.
  • a pair of equal slow stations could be distanced by an uneven number of pitches so that the two mechanical pieces 2 a and 2 b deposited consecutively in the guide 4 a , even if not simultaneously controlled by the pair of equal stations, are controlled by one or the other station of the pair during different long stops T 2 .
  • the piece-holder table 4 is stopped at every pitch alternately with said shorter operation times T 1 and longer operation times T 2 for a predetermined time, the slow stations L 1 , L 2 , L 3 , L 4 being deactivated during the shorter operation times T 1 .
  • the number and type of stations installed or activated on the rotating table 4 can be varied; consequently, in order to optimize the number of mechanical pieces controlled per time unit, it is necessary to calibrate the duration of the short stop T 1 and the long stop T 2 according to the maximum operation times of the slow stations L 1 , L 2 , L 3 , L 4 and to the operation times of the fast station V 1 .
  • control apparatus 1 is set by means of a control interface which makes it possible for the user to select a plurality of operation parameters, comprising the number and type of operation stations to be activated, the duration of the short stop T 1 for the fast stations V 1 , the duration of the long stop T 2 for the slow stations L 1 , L 1 , L 2 , L 3 and the type of control carried out by the single slow stations L 1 , L 1 , L 2 , L 3 .
  • the method according to the present disclosure provides a minimum duration T 2 min for the long stop T 2 .
  • the minimum duration T 2 min is calculated according to the type of control set for the slow stations L 1 , L 1 , L 2 , L 3 , since the more complex the type of control that said slow stations L 1 , L 1 , L 2 , L 3 must carry out, the longer the minimum duration T 2 min .
  • the method controls that the duration of the long stop T 2 is greater than the minimum duration T 2 min , verifying that the slow stations L 1 , L 1 , L 2 , L 3 are able to carry out the control in the time T 2 set by the user.
  • a calculation step of the minimum duration T 2 min is described hereunder, supposing that the slow stations are stations of the photographic type L 1 , L 1 , L 2 , L 3 which take one or more photographs of the mechanical piece 2 from different angles.
  • the different photographic angles can be obtained by rotating the mechanical piece on the guide or by moving the photographic station compared to the piece 2 .
  • the operating parameters pertaining to the type of control of the photographic station L 1 , L 1 , L 2 , L 3 comprise both the number of shots to be taken per piece and the necessity to rotate the photographic station with respect to the mechanical piece in order to obtain photographs from different angles.
  • the method determines the minimum duration T 2 min of the long stop T 2 according to the number of shots to be taken and controls that that duration of the long stop T 2 is greater than the minimum duration T 2 min .
  • the greater the number of shots to be taken the longer the operation times of a photographic station L 1 , L 1 , L 2 , L 3 .
  • the photographic stations L 1 , L 1 , L 2 , L 3 can be programmed to move between successive photographs.
  • the minimum operation duration T 2 min of a photographic station depends not only on the number of shots to be taken but also on the time needed to move the photographic station.
  • the method of the present disclosure calculates the minimum duration T 2 min by means of a formula of the type:
  • T 2 min [( X *number of shots per piece)+( Y *movement)] ms
  • the time necessary to take a photograph is, for example 80 ms while the time necessary to move the photographic station L 1 , L 2 , L 3 , L 4 is approximately 180 ms.
  • the “movement” variable is Boolean, i.e. it is set at value 1 if the photographic station L 1 , L 2 , L 3 , L 4 moves or at value 0 if the station does not move.
  • the control interface makes it possible to vary the operating parameters during activation of the slow stations L 1 , L 2 , L 3 , L 4 , in particular increasing or decreasing the duration of the long stop T 2 .
  • the method according to the present disclosure emits an alarm if the user sets the duration of the long stop T 2 at a value lower than the minimum duration T 2 min and rejects mechanical pieces 2 controlled during the operating time of the apparatus 1 when the long stop T 2 is shorter than the minimum duration T 2 min .
  • the user can also increase the duration of the long stop T 2 , so as to allow other slow stations to carry out particularly elaborate controls.
  • the method according to the disclosure also sets the duration of the short stop T 1 by means of the control interface, controlling that said duration is sufficient to load a mechanical piece 2 by means of the fast station V 1 .
  • An alarm signal is generated if the duration of the time T 1 is lower than a predetermined value or calculated automatically.
  • the method according to the present disclosure makes it possible for the user to request automatic setting of the long stop T 2 , for example at the value of the minimum duration T 2 min , so obtaining maximum number of controls of the; mechanical pieces 2 .
  • the movement of the table 4 is calculated to be synchronized so as to keep the mechanical pieces 2 stationary in front of an active operation station and to rotate by the angular pitch when a short stop T 1 or a long stop T 2 is necessary.
  • a signal is emitted, for example a visual signal on the control interface or an acoustic signal.
  • the method according to the disclosure sends a start-up signal to the rotating table 4 , to rotate by an angular pitch and permit loading of a mechanical piece, and a subsequent short stop signal to load said piece on the guide 4 a.
  • the method according to the disclosure sends another start-up signal to the rotating table 4 , to rotate by an angular pitch, and a subsequent long stop signal to load a successive mechanical piece and operation of the slow stations L 1 , L 2 , L 3 , L 4 .
  • the method according to the present disclosure stores a plurality of dimensional tolerance values for a mechanical piece, detected by the operation stations where the mechanical piece transited.
  • a step for expelling the pieces from the rotating table 4 which takes place substantially after complete rotation of the pieces on the rotating table, the mechanical pieces with acceptable dimensional tolerances are collected differentially.
  • a fast expulsion station is provided for the expulsion of the piece from the table 4 .
  • the method according to the disclosure re-checks the operating parameters, substantially controlling that the duration of the long stop T 2 is sufficient for operation of the slow stations L 1 , L 2 , L 3 , L 4 and emitting an acoustic or visual signal as described above, if the long stop T 2 is too short and the apparatus 1 cannot correctly synchronize the operation stations and the rotating table.
  • control method of the present disclosure makes it possible to exploit the fast stations V 1 both during the fast stopping times T 1 and during the short stopping times T 2 , so avoiding limits to the number of mechanical pieces controlled in the time unit at the operation time of the slow stations L 1 , L 2 , L 3 , L 4 .
  • the duration of the stopping time of the rotating table can be set according to the number of operation stations, the operating speed of said stations and the complexity of the mechanical piece to be controlled, so making it possible to optimize the efficiency with which the pieces are controlled for every possible configuration of the operation stations.
  • the present disclosure makes it possible to increase, in an unusual manner, the productivity of the control apparatus without however increasing the structural complexity.
  • the disclosure adapts the apparatus with the sole purpose of increasing the number of positions around the rotating table and the number of operation stations inserted in said positions, so obtaining an increase in productivity by means of electronic control of the operation stations and of the predetermined pitch movement of the rotating table, with stops of differing durations.
  • safety of the operation of the control apparatus is improved compared to a conventional apparatus since the number of fast operation stations, notoriously known as the most delicate, is kept unaltered.
  • the method and the apparatus according to the present disclosure are unusually flexible since the duration of the long stopping time for operation of the slow operation stations and the operating parameters of the operation stations can easily and rapidly be adjusted and during apparatus operation.

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Specific Conveyance Elements (AREA)
  • Automatic Assembly (AREA)
  • Finish Polishing, Edge Sharpening, And Grinding By Specific Grinding Devices (AREA)

Abstract

Method for quality control of mechanical pieces, such as screws, pins, pivots and similar, intended for mass-production mechanical industries such as automobile and household appliances industries and similar, by means of an apparatus comprising in casings a plurality of operation stations and a piece-holder table which is pitched revolving to convey the pieces to the operation stations. The method comprises: subdividing the operation stations into two groups, a first group comprising fast operation stations with operation times shorter than a predetermined time, and a second group comprising slow operation stations With operation times longer than a predetermined time; providing, for each slow operation station of the second group of slow stations an equal slow operation station angularly distanced by an uneven number of pitches; stopping the piece-holder table at each pitch alternately with said operation times shorter or longer than said predetermined time; deactivating all the slow operation stations during the operation time shorter than the predetermined time. Also a quality control apparatus is disclosed.

Description

    CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application claims priority to European Patent Application EP 07425211.5 filed on Apr. 13, 2007, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
  • FIELD
  • The present disclosure relates to quality control methods, processes and apparatuses. In particular, it relates to a method for quality control of mechanical pieces and a control apparatus for quality control of mechanical pieces.
  • More specifically, the present disclosure relates to a method for quality control of mechanical pieces, such as screws, pins, pivots and similar, intended for mass-production mechanical industries, such as the automobile and household appliances industries and similar, by means of an apparatus comprising in a casing a plurality of operation stations and a piece-holder table which is pitched revolving to convey the pieces to the operation stations.
  • The present disclosure also relates to a control apparatus for quality control of mechanical pieces, such as screws, pins, pivots and similar, intended for mass-production mechanical industries, such as the automobile and household appliances industries and similar, by means of an apparatus comprising in a casing a plurality of operation stations and a piece-holder table, of which there are operation stations that perform brief operations, so-called fast stations, and operation stations that perform long operations, so-called slow stations.
  • BACKGROUND
  • Apparatuses for quality control of mechanical pieces such as bolts and screws and similar are commonly used to select mechanical pieces which do not come within a specific dimensional tolerance.
  • In particular, some mechanical pieces such as special bushes, molded or machined nuts or inserts, bar or wire pieces machined on a double lathe, pieces obtained through hot or cold molding based on drawings, punching or machining, must meet a very high quality standard, meeting strict dimensional tolerances.
  • For example, for a mechanical piece with a diameter of 3 mm and a length of 8 mm, a dimensional tolerance of ±0.01 mm can be required.
  • In order to detect such tolerances, the control apparatus must be provided with operation stations for controlling the mechanical pieces, comprising artificial vision systems, laser sensors, gauges, feeler pins and so on and with a conveyor belt which positions the mechanical piece near each operation station.
  • The movement of the conveyor belt is programmed so that the mechanical piece transits at an operation station long enough to allow the station to control said piece.
  • If the mechanical piece transits in front of all the operation stations and no tolerance defect is detected, the mechanical piece is selected, otherwise it is rejected.
  • Other control apparatuses are known with a rotating table.
  • Said control apparatuses comprise an operation station where the mechanical pieces are loaded, for example fed by a piece-holder placed outside the automatic machine, a rotating table where the pieces are deposited by means of the loading operation station and a plurality of control operation stations fixed around the rotating table.
  • In some control apparatuses, the number and type of control operation stations can be varied, by mounting or removing control operation stations around the rotating table, according to the space available and the size of the single stations.
  • The table can be rotated at a predetermined angular pitch, i.e. alternating predetermined angular pitch rotations with predetermined time intervals when the rotating table is substantially fixed with respect to the stations.
  • In order to control the pieces, the loading operation station deposits the mechanical pieces, one at a time, on the rotating table so that the piece transits at the control operation stations; the rotating table is programmed so that the piece stops at each station for a predetermined length of time; sufficient to control the dimensional tolerances.
  • Several mechanical pieces, loaded one at a time by the loading operation station, can be present at the same time on the rotating table and can be controlled at the same time by the control operation stations.
  • In this way, the time required by a first control operation station to finish a first control of a first mechanical piece is exploited by a second control operation station to carry out a second control of a second mechanical piece.
  • Each mechanical piece is either selected or rejected substantially at the end of a rotation of the rotating table, i.e. after stopping for the predetermined time at the control operation stations.
  • Even if the above-mentioned control apparatuses make it possible to identify defects within very severe dimensional tolerances, they have some evident limitations.
  • The need to control a high number of mechanical pieces in a short time and the need to guarantee strict tolerance for each piece makes it imperative to optimize the efficiency of the control apparatus, i.e. to increase the number of mechanical pieces which can be controlled in the time unit.
  • However, with the control apparatuses currently available it is not possible to increase the number of pieces controlled per time unit, since each single control operation station positioned around the rotating table must have a stopping time sufficient to allow said operation station to carry out the corresponding control.
  • The technical problem at the base of the present disclosure is to increase the efficiency of a control apparatus of the above-mentioned type, increasing the number of pieces which can be controlled per time unit and, at the same time, guaranteeing high precision in the control of dimensional tolerances ensuring, therefore, a stopping time for each control operation station sufficient to carry out the corresponding control. More in particular, the technical problem is to increase the efficiency of a control apparatus for all possible configurations of the control operation stations mounted around the rotating table, determining the speed with which the mechanical pieces are positioned on the rotating table according to the number of control operation stations mounted around it and according to the time necessary to carry out the control at each station.
  • SUMMARY
  • According to the present disclosure, in a control apparatus of the type described above, the number of slow operation stations is increased, for example by putting a slow operation station beside each slow operation station already positioned along the rotating table, rotating the table at a predetermined pitch and stopping it for different time lengths, activating during the short time intervals only the fast operation stations, for example the loading operation station and, during the long time intervals substantially all the stations, so that the greater operational capacity of the fast operation stations is compensated by the greater number of slow stations.
  • On the basis of said solution, the above-mentioned technical problem is solved by a method for controlling the quality of mechanical pieces, such as screws, pins, pivots, etc, intended for mass-production mechanical industries such as the automobile and household appliances industries and similar, by means of an apparatus comprising in a casing a plurality of operation stations and a piece holder table which is pitched revolving to convey the pieces to the operation stations characterized in that it comprises the following steps:
  • to subdivide the operation stations into two groups, a first group comprising operation stations with operation times shorter than the predetermined time, or fast stations, and a second group comprising operation stations with operation times longer than the predetermined time, or slow stations;
  • to provide, for each operation station of the second group of slow stations, an equal operation station angularly distanced by an uneven number of pitches;
  • to stop the piece-holder table at each pitch alternately with said operation times shorter or longer than the predetermined time;
  • to deactivate the slow operation stations during the shorter operation times.
  • The technical problem at the base of the present disclosure is also solved by a control apparatus to put the above-described method into effect.
  • Advantageously, according to the method and apparatus of the present disclosure, the fast operation stations are exploited both during the fast time intervals and during the slow time intervals and the number of mechanical pieces controlled in the time unit is not limited by the operation time of a slow station.
  • The duration of the stopping time of the rotating table can be established according to the number of slow operation stations, the operation speed of said stations and the complexity of the mechanical piece to be controlled, so making it possible to optimize the efficiency with which each piece is controlled for every possible configuration of the operation stations.
  • Further advantages according to the control method and apparatus of the present disclosure will become more apparent from the following detailed description of an exemplary but non-limiting embodiment thereof.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 represents a plant view of an apparatus according to the present disclosure;
  • FIG. 2 schematically represents the apparatus of FIG. 1;
  • FIG. 3 schematically represents the apparatus of FIG. 1 in another phase of its functioning;
  • FIG. 4 represents, in a flow diagram, the operation phases of the apparatus according to the present disclosure.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • With reference to the attached drawings, schematically illustrated and generally indicated with reference number 1, an apparatus is shown for quality control of mechanical pieces 2, such as screws, pins, pivots and similar, intended for mass-production mechanical industries, such as such as the automobile and household appliances industries and similar.
  • The apparatus 1 comprises an input channel 3 for moving the mechanical pieces 2 from a loading tank 6 to a rotating table 4, comprising a guide 4 a for the mechanical pieces 2. In particular, an operation station S1, intended to load the pieces 2 on the table 4, removes a piece 2 from the input channel 3 and deposits it in the guide 4 a, in a loading position 4 b.
  • The rotating table 4 can be rotated in such a way as to alternate a predetermined stopping time, during which the operation station S1, also called loading station S1, loads a mechanical piece 2 into the loading position 4 b, with a rotation of the table 4 at a predetermined pitch, in order to position the mechanical piece 2 at another operation station S2, S4, for example an artificial vision system, laser sensor or gauge.
  • During the stop, the operation station S2, S4, where the mechanical piece 2 is positioned, carries out quality control while the loading station S1 loads another mechanical piece 2 in the loading position 4 b.
  • The operation stations S1, S2, S4 have different operation times.
  • In the description hereunder and with reference to FIG. 2, for exemplary but non-limiting purposes, it is presumed that the operation station S1 is a fast station V1 which requires a short interval of time T1 to acquire a mechanical piece 2 and deposit it in the loading position 4 b.
  • The operation stations S2, S4, however, are slow stations L1, L3 and require a long interval of time T2 compared to the time T1 to carry out a precise control.
  • According to the method of the present disclosure, the operation stations S1, S2, S4 are divided into two groups, a first group comprising operation stations S1 to be kept active for operation times T1 shorter than the predetermined time, or fast stations V1, and a second group comprising operation stations S2, S4 to be kept active for operation times T2 longer than the predetermined time, also called slow station L1, L3.
  • The method of the present disclosure also provides, for each slow station L1, L3, an equal slow station L2, L4, placed at said predetermined pitch.
  • The slow stations L2, L4 are additional stations intended to carry out the same type of control as the slow stations L1 and L3. In particular, the slow stations L2 and L4 are activated at the same time as the slow stations L1 and L3, during the longer operation times T2, in order to carry out controls on different mechanical pieces 2 at the same time.
  • More in particular, the rotating table 4 is set in rotation according to two different stopping times, a first brief stop T1 and a second longer stop T2 respectively.
  • During the short stop T1, the station V1 is activated to load a mechanical piece 2 in the loading position 4 b, while all the slow stations L1, L2, L3, L4 are deactivated, since they are not able to carry out a control in the time interval T1 of the short stop.
  • FIG. 2 represents the rotating table 4 in an initial state where the mechanical piece 2 a is inserted in the loading position 4 b and a second mechanical piece 2 b is ready for insertion from station V1.
  • The rotating table 4 moves by a predetermined pitch, to convey the first mechanical piece 2 a, so freeing the loading position 4 b in favor of the piece 2 b, and a short stop T1 during which the station V1 deposits the second piece 2 b in the loading position 4 b.
  • At the end of the short stop T1, the rotating table rotates by another angular pitch, simultaneously positioning the first piece 2 a at the operation station L2 and the second mechanical piece 2 b at the operation station L1, as schematically illustrated in FIG. 2.
  • In said configuration, the rotating table 4 carries out a long stop T2, during which the slow stations L1 and L2 carry out the same type of control on two different mechanical pieces, 2 b and 2 a respectively. During the long stop T2, the loading station is also operative and deposits a third piece 2 c in the loading position 4 b freed by the previous pitch movement.
  • At the end of the long stop T2, the rotating table 4 first rotates by an angular pitch to move the piece 2 c and free the loading position 4 b in favor of a fourth piece 2 d, then stops for a brief time interval T1 to load the piece 2 d and, subsequently, rotates another angular pitch to position the pieces 2 c and 2 d at the slow stations L1, L2 respectively.
  • As a result of the above-described angular pitches and stops, the first piece 2 a and the second 2 b are transported to the slow stations L3 and L4, so that, during the long stop T2, while the stations L1 and L2 are operating on the third and fourth pieces 2 c and 2 d, the slow stations L4 and L3 are operating on the first and second pieces 2 a and 2 b.
  • In other words, with reference to the configuration of the operation stations in FIG. 1, the method of the present disclosure provides a loading step which comprises depositing at least two mechanical pieces 2 a, 2 b on the guide 4 a of the rotating table 4, carrying out at least one angular pitch between loading of consecutive pieces and at least one corresponding short stop T1 to allow the fast station V1 to load the piece, and a control step comprising a long stop T2 during which the pieces 2 a, 2 b are simultaneously controlled by the slow stations L1, L2, L3, L4.
  • Advantageously, the fast loading station V1 is not delayed by the slow stations L1, L2, L3, L4 since the rotating table 4 is rotated, alternately, with a short stop T1 to exploit the loading speed of the fast station V1 and a long stop T2 which gives the slow stations L1, L2, L3, L4 a time T2 sufficient to carry out the corresponding control.
  • Given the embodiment of FIG. 1, it can immediately be seen that the method according to the present disclosure can be applied to a plurality of configurations where the number of operation stations mounted and fixed around the rotating table 4 can be varied.
  • In particular, the method provides for the operation stations to be divided into two groups, a first group comprising operation stations to be kept active for operation times T1 shorter than a predetermined time, or fast stations, and a second group comprising operation stations to be kept active for operation times longer than said predetermined time, or slow stations.
  • For each slow station, an equal slow station is provided angularly distanced by an uneven number of pitches.
  • In fact, unlike the embodiment described with reference to FIG. 2 where the equal slow stations respectively L1, L2 and L3, L4 are positioned in successions a pair of equal slow stations could be distanced by an uneven number of pitches so that the two mechanical pieces 2 a and 2 b deposited consecutively in the guide 4 a, even if not simultaneously controlled by the pair of equal stations, are controlled by one or the other station of the pair during different long stops T2.
  • The piece-holder table 4 is stopped at every pitch alternately with said shorter operation times T1 and longer operation times T2 for a predetermined time, the slow stations L1, L2, L3, L4 being deactivated during the shorter operation times T1.
  • As mentioned above, in a control apparatus, the number and type of stations installed or activated on the rotating table 4 can be varied; consequently, in order to optimize the number of mechanical pieces controlled per time unit, it is necessary to calibrate the duration of the short stop T1 and the long stop T2 according to the maximum operation times of the slow stations L1, L2, L3, L4 and to the operation times of the fast station V1.
  • More in particular, according to the method of the present disclosure, the control apparatus 1 is set by means of a control interface which makes it possible for the user to select a plurality of operation parameters, comprising the number and type of operation stations to be activated, the duration of the short stop T1 for the fast stations V1, the duration of the long stop T2 for the slow stations L1, L1, L2, L3 and the type of control carried out by the single slow stations L1, L1, L2, L3.
  • In order to avoid malfunctioning of the apparatus 1, due to incorrect setting of operation parameters, for example to avoid rejection of quality mechanical pieces 2, the method according to the present disclosure provides a minimum duration T2 min for the long stop T2.
  • The minimum duration T2 min is calculated according to the type of control set for the slow stations L1, L1, L2, L3, since the more complex the type of control that said slow stations L1, L1, L2, L3 must carry out, the longer the minimum duration T2 min.
  • In particular, the method controls that the duration of the long stop T2 is greater than the minimum duration T2 min, verifying that the slow stations L1, L1, L2, L3 are able to carry out the control in the time T2 set by the user.
  • For exemplary purposes, a calculation step of the minimum duration T2 min is described hereunder, supposing that the slow stations are stations of the photographic type L1, L1, L2, L3 which take one or more photographs of the mechanical piece 2 from different angles. The different photographic angles can be obtained by rotating the mechanical piece on the guide or by moving the photographic station compared to the piece 2.
  • The operating parameters pertaining to the type of control of the photographic station L1, L1, L2, L3 comprise both the number of shots to be taken per piece and the necessity to rotate the photographic station with respect to the mechanical piece in order to obtain photographs from different angles.
  • The method determines the minimum duration T2 min of the long stop T2 according to the number of shots to be taken and controls that that duration of the long stop T2 is greater than the minimum duration T2 min. In fact, the greater the number of shots to be taken, the longer the operation times of a photographic station L1, L1, L2, L3.
  • As said above, the photographic stations L1, L1, L2, L3 can be programmed to move between successive photographs. In this case, the minimum operation duration T2 min of a photographic station depends not only on the number of shots to be taken but also on the time needed to move the photographic station.
  • In this case, the method of the present disclosure calculates the minimum duration T2 min by means of a formula of the type:

  • T2min=[(X*number of shots per piece)+(Y*movement)]ms
  • where X is the time necessary to take a photograph and Y is the time necessary to carry out movement of the photographic station L1, L2, L3, L4.
  • The time necessary to take a photograph is, for example 80 ms while the time necessary to move the photographic station L1, L2, L3, L4 is approximately 180 ms. The “movement” variable is Boolean, i.e. it is set at value 1 if the photographic station L1, L2, L3, L4 moves or at value 0 if the station does not move.
  • The control interface makes it possible to vary the operating parameters during activation of the slow stations L1, L2, L3, L4, in particular increasing or decreasing the duration of the long stop T2.
  • The method according to the present disclosure emits an alarm if the user sets the duration of the long stop T2 at a value lower than the minimum duration T2 min and rejects mechanical pieces 2 controlled during the operating time of the apparatus 1 when the long stop T2 is shorter than the minimum duration T2 min.
  • The user can also increase the duration of the long stop T2, so as to allow other slow stations to carry out particularly elaborate controls.
  • The method according to the disclosure also sets the duration of the short stop T1 by means of the control interface, controlling that said duration is sufficient to load a mechanical piece 2 by means of the fast station V1. An alarm signal is generated if the duration of the time T1 is lower than a predetermined value or calculated automatically.
  • Advantageously, the method according to the present disclosure makes it possible for the user to request automatic setting of the long stop T2, for example at the value of the minimum duration T2 min, so obtaining maximum number of controls of the; mechanical pieces 2.
  • On the basis of the user's settings, the movement of the table 4 is calculated to be synchronized so as to keep the mechanical pieces 2 stationary in front of an active operation station and to rotate by the angular pitch when a short stop T1 or a long stop T2 is necessary.
  • If the user's settings cannot be satisfied, for example because two equal stations distanced by an uneven number of pitches are not available, a signal is emitted, for example a visual signal on the control interface or an acoustic signal.
  • On the other hand, if the user's settings can be satisfied, the method according to the disclosure sends a start-up signal to the rotating table 4, to rotate by an angular pitch and permit loading of a mechanical piece, and a subsequent short stop signal to load said piece on the guide 4 a.
  • At the end of the short stop, the method according to the disclosure sends another start-up signal to the rotating table 4, to rotate by an angular pitch, and a subsequent long stop signal to load a successive mechanical piece and operation of the slow stations L1, L2, L3, L4.
  • The method according to the present disclosure stores a plurality of dimensional tolerance values for a mechanical piece, detected by the operation stations where the mechanical piece transited. During a step for expelling the pieces from the rotating table 4, which takes place substantially after complete rotation of the pieces on the rotating table, the mechanical pieces with acceptable dimensional tolerances are collected differentially. In particular, a fast expulsion station is provided for the expulsion of the piece from the table 4.
  • When a user modifies the operating parameters of the apparatus 1 during operation, for example increasing or decreasing the duration of the long stop T2, the method according to the disclosure re-checks the operating parameters, substantially controlling that the duration of the long stop T2 is sufficient for operation of the slow stations L1, L2, L3, L4 and emitting an acoustic or visual signal as described above, if the long stop T2 is too short and the apparatus 1 cannot correctly synchronize the operation stations and the rotating table.
  • Advantageously, the control method of the present disclosure makes it possible to exploit the fast stations V1 both during the fast stopping times T1 and during the short stopping times T2, so avoiding limits to the number of mechanical pieces controlled in the time unit at the operation time of the slow stations L1, L2, L3, L4.
  • Advantageously, the duration of the stopping time of the rotating table can be set according to the number of operation stations, the operating speed of said stations and the complexity of the mechanical piece to be controlled, so making it possible to optimize the efficiency with which the pieces are controlled for every possible configuration of the operation stations.
  • Advantageously, the present disclosure makes it possible to increase, in an unusual manner, the productivity of the control apparatus without however increasing the structural complexity. In fact, the disclosure adapts the apparatus with the sole purpose of increasing the number of positions around the rotating table and the number of operation stations inserted in said positions, so obtaining an increase in productivity by means of electronic control of the operation stations and of the predetermined pitch movement of the rotating table, with stops of differing durations.
  • Advantageously, according to the present disclosure, safety of the operation of the control apparatus is improved compared to a conventional apparatus since the number of fast operation stations, notoriously known as the most delicate, is kept unaltered.
  • Finally, the method and the apparatus according to the present disclosure are unusually flexible since the duration of the long stopping time for operation of the slow operation stations and the operating parameters of the operation stations can easily and rapidly be adjusted and during apparatus operation.
  • Accordingly, what has been shown are a method and apparatus for quality control of mechanical pieces. While such method and apparatus have been described by means of specific embodiments and applications thereof, it is understood that numerous modifications and variations could be made thereto by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the claims, the disclosure may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein.

Claims (15)

1. A method for quality control of mechanical pieces, by way of an apparatus comprising a plurality of operation stations and a piece-holder table configured to revolve in a pitched manner to convey the mechanical pieces to the operation stations, the method comprising:
subdividing the operation stations into two groups, a first group comprising fast operation stations to be kept operating with operation times shorter than a predetermined time, and a second group comprising slow operation stations to be kept operating with operation times longer than a predetermined time;
providing, for each slow operation station, an equally slow operation station angularly distanced by an uneven number of pitches;
stopping the piece-holder table at each pitch alternately with said operation times shorter or longer than said predetermined time; and
deactivating all the slow operation stations during said operation times shorter than said predetermined time.
2. The method according to claim 1, further comprising providing a user control interface to set said operation time longer than said predetermined time and/or to set one or more operating parameters of said slow operation stations.
3. The method according to claim 2, further comprising varying said operation time longer than said predetermined time by way of said user control interface during operation of said operation stations.
4. The method according to claim 3, further comprising providing an automatic calculation of a minimum duration of said longer operation time, said calculation receiving input of said operating parameters of said slow operation stations.
5. The method according to claim 4, further comprising emitting an alarm signal if the longer operation time is shorter than the minimum duration and rejecting the mechanical pieces loaded on the piece-holder table when said longer operation time is shorter than the minimum duration.
6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the mechanical pieces include at least one of screws, pins, and pivots, and are adapted for mass production in mechanical industries.
7. The method according to claim 6, wherein the mechanical industries include automobile industries and household appliances industries.
8. A control apparatus for quality control of mechanical pieces, the control apparatus comprising a piece-holder table and a plurality of operation stations, the operation stations comprising fast operation stations to be kept operating for plural instances of a short operating time, and slow operation stations to be kept operating for plural instances of a long operating time,
wherein the piece-holder table is a pitched rotating table stopping at each pitch alternately with a short stop, lasting said short operating time, and with a long stop, lasting said long operating time, the control apparatus further comprising at least two equally slow stations placed at an angular distance at an uneven number of pitches, the slow stations being started up only on occasion of the long stop of the piece-holder table.
9. The control apparatus according to claim 8, said fast operation stations comprise a station for loading the mechanical pieces on said piece-holder table and a station for unloading the pieces from said table.
10. The control apparatus according to claim 9, further comprising a user control interface configured to
set said long operation time; and
set one or more operating parameters of said slow operation stations.
11. The control apparatus according to claim 10, wherein said slow operation stations comprise photographic stations.
12. The control apparatus according to claim 11, wherein said one or more operating parameters comprise a number of photographs to be taken by said photographic stations in said long operation time.
13. The control apparatus according to claim 12, wherein said one or more operating parameters comprise a variable to enable one or more movements of said photographic stations with respect to said mechanical piece to take said photographs from one or more different angles.
14. The control apparatus according to claim 8, wherein the mechanical pieces include at least one of screws, pins, and pivots, and are adapted for mass production in mechanical industries.
15. The control apparatus according to claim 14, wherein the mechanical industries include automobile industries and household appliances industries.
US12/100,989 2007-04-13 2008-04-10 Method and apparatus for quality control of mechanical pieces Active 2030-11-17 US8096041B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP07425211.5 2007-04-13
EP07425211 2007-04-13
EP07425211A EP1980362B1 (en) 2007-04-13 2007-04-13 Method and apparatus for quality control of mechanical pieces

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20080269935A1 true US20080269935A1 (en) 2008-10-30
US8096041B2 US8096041B2 (en) 2012-01-17

Family

ID=38875058

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/100,989 Active 2030-11-17 US8096041B2 (en) 2007-04-13 2008-04-10 Method and apparatus for quality control of mechanical pieces

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US8096041B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1980362B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE472388T1 (en)
DE (1) DE602007007435D1 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103100735A (en) * 2012-02-03 2013-05-15 上海电气机床成套工程有限公司 Four-station door hinge numerical control double-shaft drilling machine
DE102016111434B3 (en) * 2016-06-22 2017-12-14 Schuler Pressen Gmbh Plant for processing of disk parts

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3938748A (en) * 1969-03-03 1976-02-17 Giuseppe Camardella Machine tool with intermittently rotatable turret, more particularly a coil winder, and method of operating same
US4507993A (en) * 1983-03-24 1985-04-02 The Warner & Swasey Company Machine tool with two speed turret indexing
JPS6274556A (en) * 1985-09-24 1987-04-06 Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd Automatic conveying device
US4823459A (en) * 1986-09-30 1989-04-25 Tanaka Seiko Co., Ltd. Automatic finishing system for wound coil in coil winding machine
US6788805B1 (en) * 1999-08-03 2004-09-07 Hitachi High-Tech Instruments Co., Ltd. Electronic component-recognizing device
US7777871B2 (en) * 2008-04-29 2010-08-17 Acushnet Company Apparatus for measuring physical properties of golf balls and cores

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6178608B1 (en) * 1999-03-26 2001-01-30 Bourn & Koch Machine Tool Co. Rotary transfer machine
RU2226972C2 (en) * 2002-02-19 2004-04-20 "ЛегПром Прогресс" Method and apparatus for manufacture of boots with double-layer sole

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3938748A (en) * 1969-03-03 1976-02-17 Giuseppe Camardella Machine tool with intermittently rotatable turret, more particularly a coil winder, and method of operating same
US4507993A (en) * 1983-03-24 1985-04-02 The Warner & Swasey Company Machine tool with two speed turret indexing
JPS6274556A (en) * 1985-09-24 1987-04-06 Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd Automatic conveying device
US4823459A (en) * 1986-09-30 1989-04-25 Tanaka Seiko Co., Ltd. Automatic finishing system for wound coil in coil winding machine
US6788805B1 (en) * 1999-08-03 2004-09-07 Hitachi High-Tech Instruments Co., Ltd. Electronic component-recognizing device
US7777871B2 (en) * 2008-04-29 2010-08-17 Acushnet Company Apparatus for measuring physical properties of golf balls and cores

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE602007007435D1 (en) 2010-08-12
ATE472388T1 (en) 2010-07-15
US8096041B2 (en) 2012-01-17
EP1980362A1 (en) 2008-10-15
EP1980362B1 (en) 2010-06-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3541162B1 (en) Component mounting line production management system and production management method
AU2013350264B2 (en) Computer numerical control assembly or processing of components
JP5666954B2 (en) Method and apparatus for manufacturing a helical spring by spring winding
US20100063617A1 (en) Machining state checking method and machining state checking apparatus
EP0515149A1 (en) Apparatus for applying scratch-resistant coatings to plastic ophthalmic lenses
JP2015510841A (en) Method and apparatus for manufacturing a helical spring by spring winding
US8096041B2 (en) Method and apparatus for quality control of mechanical pieces
US11282320B2 (en) Method and apparatus for sorting disc-shaped objects
CN101904560B (en) Cutting device and method for setting up and testing the operation preparation of cutting device
CN108292121A (en) Method for transport box
JP6321511B2 (en) Equipment abnormality judgment method and equipment abnormality judgment system
EP0565019B1 (en) Device for incorporating missing articles in a stream of articles in the process of being packaged
US8706264B1 (en) Time synchronized registration feedback
JP3680253B2 (en) Method and apparatus for inserting electronic component with lead wire
CN119993721B (en) A fully automatic magnetic core threading, glue dispensing and drying machine
JP2002217594A (en) Method and apparatus for inserting electronic component
ITMI20070754A1 (en) METHOD FOR THE QUALITY CONTROL OF MECHANICAL PARTS AND RELATIVE CONTROL EQUIPMENT
JP5128804B2 (en) Inspection method and inspection apparatus
EP1494348A2 (en) Container inspection machine
CN115972586A (en) Welding system and method for medical infusion filter
CN120112468A (en) Method for unloading processed products for unloading workpieces and machine-type unloading assembly, as well as production method and machine-type production assembly
SU1530412A1 (en) Automated sector
WO2023170731A1 (en) Buffer conveyor
CN114364482A (en) Method for positioning a machining head of a laser machining device, and associated laser machining device and computer program product
JPH074744B2 (en) Method and device for determining proper work time in plural works

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: DIMAC S.R.L., ITALY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:AGRATI, CARLO;REEL/FRAME:021222/0720

Effective date: 20080410

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YR, SMALL ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M2552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 8

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YR, SMALL ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M2553); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 12