[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2008035338A2 - Procédé et système de protection active - Google Patents

Procédé et système de protection active Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2008035338A2
WO2008035338A2 PCT/IL2007/001153 IL2007001153W WO2008035338A2 WO 2008035338 A2 WO2008035338 A2 WO 2008035338A2 IL 2007001153 W IL2007001153 W IL 2007001153W WO 2008035338 A2 WO2008035338 A2 WO 2008035338A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
platform
projectile
threat
rocket
radar
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/IL2007/001153
Other languages
English (en)
Other versions
WO2008035338A3 (fr
Inventor
David Longman
Jacob Tzlil
Original Assignee
Elta Systems Ltd.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Elta Systems Ltd. filed Critical Elta Systems Ltd.
Priority to US12/442,053 priority Critical patent/US20100026554A1/en
Publication of WO2008035338A2 publication Critical patent/WO2008035338A2/fr
Publication of WO2008035338A3 publication Critical patent/WO2008035338A3/fr

Links

Classifications

    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41—WEAPONS
    • F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G7/00—Direction control systems for self-propelled missiles
    • F41G7/20—Direction control systems for self-propelled missiles based on continuous observation of target position
    • F41G7/30—Command link guidance systems
    • F41G7/301—Details
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41—WEAPONS
    • F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G5/00—Elevating or traversing control systems for guns
    • F41G5/08—Ground-based tracking-systems for aerial targets
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41—WEAPONS
    • F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G7/00—Direction control systems for self-propelled missiles
    • F41G7/20—Direction control systems for self-propelled missiles based on continuous observation of target position
    • F41G7/22—Homing guidance systems
    • F41G7/224—Deceiving or protecting means

Definitions

  • This invention relates to an active protection method and system and more specifically to active protection method and system for providing protection from a threat, particularly for use with a mobile or aerial platform such as a helicopter, UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) or the like.
  • a mobile or aerial platform such as a helicopter, UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) or the like.
  • a variety of methods are known relating to protecting a vehicle or the like from a destructive threat.
  • US Patent No. 4,233,605 discloses a Doppler radar signature simulator decoy for protecting a helicopter under attack by hostile weapons which home in on a Doppler radar return signal from the helicopter rotors.
  • the decoy returns a strong radar signal which duplicates a relatively weaker signal emitted from the helicopter rotors, leading hostile weapons to the decoy.
  • US Patent No. 6,980,151 discloses a bi-static continuous wave radar system and related methods for detecting incoming threats from ballistic projectiles includes a remote source of RF illumination, and a local receiver installed in one or more target aircraft.
  • a first receiving channel acquires direct path illumination from the source and provides a reference signal, and a second receiving channel acquires a scatter signal reflected by a projectile.
  • a processor coupled to each receiver corrects scatter signal Doppler offset induced by relative source motion, isolates narrowband Doppler signals to derive signatures characteristic of the projectile, and by executing appropriate algorithms, compares the derived signatures to modeled signatures stored in memory. If the comparison yields a substantial similarity, the processor outputs a warning signal sufficient to initiate defensive countermeasures.
  • 7,066,427 discloses an interceptor device adapted to protect a platform associated therewith against an incoming threat having a trajectory by intercepting the threat in an intercept zone.
  • Such an interceptor device comprises a housing defining an axis and a countermeasure device operably engaged with the housing. At least one detonating charge is housed by the housing and is operably engaged with the countermeasure device.
  • a controller device is in communication with the at least one detonating charge, wherein the controller device is housed by the housing and is configured to direct the at least one detonating charge to deploy the countermeasure device at least partially radially outward with respect to the axis of the housing and in correspondence with the trajectory of the threat to thereby cause the countermeasure to impact the threat in the intercept zone.
  • Flight GuardTM One active protection defense system is the Flight GuardTM system available by Israel Aircraft IndustriesTM Ltd. and Elta SystemsTM Ltd., Israel.
  • the Flight GuardTM system is mounted onboard an airborne platform, and is designed to detect an approaching heat seeking threat and in response, launch a deceiving countermeasure (flares).
  • the Flight GuardTM system is described e.g. at www.israeli- weapons.com/weapons/aircraft/systems/flight guard/Flight Guard.htm).
  • the TrophyTM system creates a hemispheric protected zone around the vehicle where incoming threats are intercepted and defeated. It has three elements providing threat detection and tracking, launching and intercept functions.
  • the threat detection and warning subsystem consists of several sensors, including flat-panel radars, placed at strategic locations around the protected vehicle, to provide full hemispherical coverage.
  • RPG's Rocket Propelled Grenade
  • RPG's represent a serious threat to mobile land and aerial platforms.
  • RPG's are considered the second cause of death of US soldiers in the Iraq war.
  • inexperienced RPG operators could engage a stationary target effectively from 150-300 meters, while experienced users could kill a target at up to 500 meters, and moving targets at 300 meters.
  • One known way of protecting a platform against RPG's is to cause explosion or discharge of the RPG's warhead away from the platform.
  • Another known protection approach against RPG's and short range missiles employ fitting the platform to be protected with armor (e.g. reactive armor, hybrid armor or slat armor).
  • armor e.g. reactive armor, hybrid armor or slat armor
  • arterial threat or “airborne threat” or “threat” are used interchangeably to refer to any threat, including projectiles, rockets, missiles and other aerial weapons, having a trajectory and ordnance such that may cause damage to a body or location that it is desired to protect if allowed to intercept and/or detonate and/or impact said body or location.
  • the protection systems and methods of the invention are useful for protecting many kinds of aerial platforms, including but not limited to, helicopters, UAVs (Unmanned Airborne Vehicle), RPVs (Remotely Piloted Vehicle), light aircraft, hovering platforms, low speed traveling platforms.
  • the protection systems and methods of the invention are useful for protecting platforms against many kinds of threats, including but not limited to, guided missiles or rockets, unguided missiles or rockets, self-guided and maneuvering missile or rocket, heat seeking missiles or rockets, radar lock missiles or rockets, shoulder missiles or rockets, short range missiles or rockets, RPG (Rocket Propelled Grenade), TOW (Tube-launched, Optically tracked, Wire-guided missile), Hot, Milan, Cornet, Stinger, Strela, and Sager.
  • an active protection system mountable onboard a platform for protecting the platform, comprising: a radar system configured for generating output data including threat output data corresponding to a velocity, a range, and an angle of the threat with respect to the platform in an airspace around the platform, the output data being useful for detecting, identifying and tracking of at least one threat approaching the platform, and; a countermeasure system capable of launching at least one non- fragmentation interceptor projectile in response to receiving a control command; a control unit configured for receiving the output data from the radar system and for generating the control command and transmitting the control command to the at least one non- fragmentation interceptor projectile, thereby enabling countering the threat
  • the radar system comprising one or more sensor unit, located at selected locations onboard the platform.
  • the radar system is further configured for tracking of the at least one projectile, and generating output data corresponding to a velocity, a range and an angle of the projectile with respect to the platform.
  • the radar system is a multibeam radar, a digital multibeam radar or a phased-array radar, e.g. a 32- beam multi-beam radar system or a digital multi beam radar system.
  • the radar system is designed to operate in a 10-20GHz frequency range, and the weight of the radar system is in the range of 10-100 Kg.
  • the countermeasure system comprises one or more recoilless battery of projectiles, located at selected locations onboard the platform, and associated with at least one activation unit, the activation unit being operatively connected to the control unit and configured for responding to a command signal from the control unit by launching one or more projectiles.
  • the countermeasure system comprises at least one recoilless battery of projectiles, associated with at least one activation and aiming unit, the activation and aiming unit being operatively connected to the control unit and configured for responding to a command signal from the control unit by aiming and launching one or more projectiles. Aiming is performed by aiming the battery as a whole or by aiming at least one part thereof.
  • the system further comprises a guidance system capable of guiding the projectile toward an engagement with the threat.
  • the system further comprises communication unit operable to facilitate at least uplink communication with the projectile, thereby enabling guiding the projectile toward a predicted engagement point with the threat.
  • control unit is a hardware/software utility configured for performing the following operations:
  • control unit is a hardware/software utility configured for performing the following operations:
  • control unit is communicatively coupled to platform instrumentation for receiving at least platform trajectory data and the calculation of the trajectory of the threat and the platform is carried out based on platform trajectory data received from the platform instrumentation.
  • control unit is further configured for processing platform trajectory data based on the output data, and the calculation of the trajectory of the threat and the platform is carried out based on the platform trajectory data.
  • control unit is further configured for tracking the at least one projectile, after it was launched, and to perform operations (b) and (c) based on information corresponding to velocity, range and angle of the projectile with respect to the platform that is measured after launch.
  • control unit is further configured for selecting one from among the batteries, in accordance with a predefined criteria, for launching the projectile, and for directing the command signal accordingly.
  • an active protection method for protecting a platform against an approaching threat comprising:
  • the generating of radar output data is carried out based on measurements received from one or more sensor unit, located at selected locations onboard the platform.
  • the method comprises tracking of the at least one projectile, and generating CM output data corresponding to a velocity, a range and an angle of the projectile with respect to the platform.
  • the method comprises providing uplink communication with the projectile, thereby enabling guiding the projectile toward a predicted engagement point with the threat.
  • the method comprises: calculating at least trajectory of the threat and the platform and determining an engagement point between the threat and the projectile; determining at least one suitable projectile to be launched, if at all; and repeating any one of operations (a) to (g) as many times as required.
  • the method comprises tracking the at least one projectile, after it was launched, and performing the calculating operation and/or determining operation based on information corresponding to velocity, range and angle of the projectile with respect to the platform, measured after launch.
  • the method comprises selecting one from among the batteries, in accordance with a predefined criteria, for launching the projectile, and directing the command signal accordingly.
  • the method comprises receiving platform trajectory data from platform instrumentation, and the calculation of the trajectory of the threat and the platform is carried out based on platform trajectory data received from the platform instrumentation.
  • platform trajectory data is processed based on radar output data.
  • Fig. 1 is a schematic representation of an active protection system according to an embodiment of the invention
  • Fig. 2 is a more detailed representation of an active protection system according to an embodiment of the invention
  • Fig. 3 is a flow chart illustrating a sequence of operations carried out in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
  • the present invention provides an active protection system and method for protecting a platform against aerial threats.
  • the concept of the invention will be disclosed mainly with reference to the protection of aerial platforms and specifically helicopters (other non-limiting examples of aerial platforms are RPV (Remotely Piloted Vehicle), UAV (Unmanned Airborne Vehicle), light aircraft, hovering platforms, low speed traveling platforms and more), however the invention is not limited thereto.
  • the protection system and method of the invention is useful against a variety of threats, such as RPG's, short range guided and unguided missiles or rockets, heat seeker missiles or rockets, radar lock missiles or rockets, shoulder missiles or rockets, and the like. As illustrated in Fig.
  • a helicopter 100 is fitted with an active protection system 10 (not shown in its entirety in Fig. 1), for protecting the helicopter 100 against one (or a variety of) RPG threat 120 (only one threat 120 is shown).
  • the protection system 10 is capable of detecting, identifying and tracking the threat 120, and in response, launching countermeasure devices, e.g. one (or a variety of) projectile 41, and directing it toward threat 120 (only one such projectile is shown).
  • Projectile 41 may be directed or guided toward a desired engagement point EP.
  • projectile 41 is capable of killing threat 120, e.g. by a direct hit or by discharging the threat (e.g.
  • projectile 41 is aimed at absorbing some or all of the kinetic energy carried by the threat.
  • the projectile 41 is designed to cause explosion of the threat 120 at a certain safety distance R away from the helicopter (by way of non-limiting example, the engagement between the threat and the projectile is designed to occur at about 30-50 meters away from the helicopter).
  • R safety distance
  • the engagement between the threat and the projectile is designed to occur at about 30-50 meters away from the helicopter.
  • Safety distance R is selected such that the platform will experience no direct hit from the threat; its particles (in case the threat exploded) or projectile's particles) as well as blast or jet flow. This is different from solutions that allow the platform to be protected to absorb a certain amount of energy, by means of a protecting shield or slat armor mounted thereon.
  • Fig. 2 is a more detailed illustration of a defense system 40 according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • the protection system includes a radar system 20, control unit (controller) 30 and countermeasure system 40.
  • Countermeasure system comprises at least one battery (or dispenser) of non- fragmentation interceptor projectiles 41.
  • the battery 40 comprises one or a plurality of interceptor projectiles 41 such as guided missiles or rockets, comprised in optionally recoilless launch tubes or ejection racks (not shown). According to an embodiment of the invention, the battery 40 may be placed at a suitable location on the helicopter, and in some embodiments it may be better to have two or more said batteries 40, located at selected locations, for example located on the port side and on the starboard side of the helicopter 100.
  • interceptor projectiles 41 such as guided missiles or rockets, comprised in optionally recoilless launch tubes or ejection racks (not shown).
  • the battery 40 may be placed at a suitable location on the helicopter, and in some embodiments it may be better to have two or more said batteries 40, located at selected locations, for example located on the port side and on the starboard side of the helicopter 100.
  • Each battery 40 may be associated with an activation unit 42 that is operatively connected to the controller 30, and is configured for responding to a command signal from the controller 30 by launching one or more projectiles 41.
  • the controller may also determine which battery is best located to maximize success of neutralization of the threat, and direct the command signal accordingly.
  • the controller 30 may also determine to launch a projectile 41 from a particular battery 40 as opposed to another battery 40 according to other criteria, for example when the stocks in another battery may be exhausted, and/or when one battery may be much fuller than another, balancing the weight distribution, so long as there is still enough safety margin to destroy the threat safely sufficiently far from the helicopter.
  • the controller 30 may provide a command signal for more than one projectile 41 to be launched to counter each moving object 120 of an aerial threat.
  • Each projectile 41 thus launched can be preprogrammed via the activation unit 42 and with data provided by the controller, to follow a particular desired trajectory designed to intercept the moving objects at a particular, preferably safe distance from the helicopter 100.
  • the desired trajectory for projectile 41 may be provided to the projectile (uplink communication) by means of a closed loop guidance system 50, and a corresponding guidance system comprised in the projectile, enabling the same to be guided to an engagement point via remote control, using positional and trajectory data thereof provided via the radar system 20 and controller 30 to correct the trajectory of the projectile 41 to the desired trajectory.
  • the location from which a selected projectile would be launched can be determined as follows: the batteries are placed at selected locations onboard the platform, e.g. at the front, back and sides of the platform.
  • the projectile best suitable for interception is selected and launched at a direction dictated by the position of the platform at the moment of launch.
  • the projectile is directed toward the target (toward the predicted engagement point) during its flight.
  • the battery and parts thereof cannot be directed toward a direction 5 required for launch or interception, without maneuvering of the platform as a whole (e.g. preliminary maneuver performed for positioning the platform and hence, one of the batteries, in a suitable launch position).
  • This embodiment employs guided or self-guided (maneuvering) projectiles.
  • Direction of the projectile toward the threat is carried out via io uplink communication (as well as downlink communication, according to certain embodiments of the invention), e.g. by providing the projectile with updated threat positioning data (for example, threat coordinates, engagement point coordinates, etc.), or with guidance instructions (for example, appropriate steering signal).
  • updated threat positioning data for example, threat coordinates, engagement point coordinates, etc.
  • guidance instructions for example, appropriate steering signal
  • the batteries or parts thereof can be aimed, e.g. moved relative to the platform, aligned, positioned or directed, prior to launch.
  • the controller (element 30 illustrated in Fig. 2) is further configured for determining aiming instructions and generating
  • the countermeasure system (element 40 illustrated in Fig. 2) comprises or is integrated with suitable aiming means (e.g motorized aiming unit) abapted for aiming
  • suitable aiming means e.g motorized aiming unit
  • the projectiles 41 are thus configured for accelerating to a high speed and for accurately maneuvering at such speeds to intercept the threat as quickly as possible, and as far away from the helicopter as possible. Further, the projectiles
  • the casing of the projectiles 41 in particular of the warhead thereof, may be made from an ablatable material such as to burn away in the blast, thereby further minimizing any possibility of fragments from the destruction of the incoming threat to subsequently damage the helicopter.
  • the interceptor projectiles 41 is a self guided and maneuvering, light weighted rocket of e.g. about 5kg or less, carrying e.g. about lkg or 0.5kg of detonation (or less), capable of traveling about 150-300 meters in a second.
  • the amount of detonation carried by the projectile is dictated, inter-alia, by the accuracy of guidance, which in turn, depends, inter alia, upon accuracy of radar readings.
  • countermeasure system 40 comprises a combination of projectiles capable of killing threats (e.g. generating blast that activate threat's warhead), and flairs capable of deceiving heat seeker and radar lock threats.
  • Projectiles capable of killing threats (e.g. generating blast that activate threat's warhead), and flairs capable of deceiving heat seeker and radar lock threats.
  • radar system 20 comprises one or more sensors (antenna arrays) 21 (three sensors are shown in Fig. 2 by way of a non-limiting example). The sensors are located at selected locations onboard the helicopter, thereby providing required coverage.
  • the radar system is designed to perform detection as well as tracking and fire control.
  • detection radars e.g. as used in the Flight GuardTM system
  • tracking radars have narrower field of view than detection radars.
  • the TrophyTM system uses wide angle radar for fire detection and narrow angle radar for tracking.
  • the present invention makes use of a single radar system to perform threat detection and tracking. This could be achieved e.g.
  • the radar system is a 32- beam multi beam or digital multi beam radar system.
  • the radar system is capable of performing detection as well as identification, tracking and fire control functions. Having the same radar performing detection, tracking and fire control functions contribute to better accuracy and better reaction time.
  • accuracy, efficiency e.g. in various weather conditions
  • antenna size as well as costs depend, inter-alia, on radar operation frequency range. Higher frequencies (e.g. 50-60GHz) typically yield better accuracy and efficiency in bad weather conditions, require smaller antennas and are substantially expensive systems compared to lower frequencies.
  • the radar system is designed to operate in the 10-20GHz frequency range, wherein the required accuracy is achieved by means of suitable antenna size, radar design and radar data processing.
  • the radar system In order to enable very short reaction time (of about few tens and hundreds of milliseconds from detection up to launch) required for efficient protection from threats like RPG's, the radar system needs to be highly accurate e.g. providing angular accuracy of about one milliradian and range accuracy of about 0.5 meter or less. Preferably, the radar system is light weighted, of about 15kg.
  • Control unit controller
  • control unit 30 is a hardware/software utility and as such its functions could be realized by one or more modules incorporated in the radar system 20; one or more modules incorporated in the counter-measure system 40; or certain control functions and operations could be realized by modules incorporated in the radar system 20, while others by modules incorporated in the countermeasure system 40. Further, such a control unit may be integrated with, or the functions thereof provided by, the fire control computer or the mission computer of the helicopter 100, when the helicopter is fitted with such a computer.
  • the controller 30 is configured to perform the following sequence of control operations 300, as illustrated in Fig. 3: Operation 310 - Threat detection, identification and tracking: radar data regarding airspace around the platform (e.g full airspace hemisphere around the helicopter; half hemisphere above or below the helicopter; or selected zones in the vicinity of the helicopter) is dynamically analyzed. A threat is detected and identified, e.g. based on comparison of threat signature to a lookout table; comparison of threat velocity to a threshold velocity; analysis of approach direction (angle), range and velocity; build up of threat trajectory based on data corresponding to several measurements, and the like. Trajectory and velocity of the platform may also be considered, e.g. in order to minimize effect of reflections from the platform itself. Upon identification, the threat is tracked, and output data, including threat output data corresponding to velocity, range and an angle of the threat with respect to the platform, is dynamically generated.
  • Threat detection, identification and tracking radar data regarding airspace around the platform (e.g full airspace hemisphere around the helicopter
  • Operation 320 trajectory calculations and determination of engagement point:
  • the desired engagement point (point EP illustrated in Fig. 1) is determined, based on calculation and prediction of threat and projectile trajectories.
  • the engagement point is determined such that neutralization of the threat may occur at a safe distance away from the helicopter (distance R illustrated in Fig. 1).
  • the engagement point is selected such that direct hit of the threat by the projectile is expected.
  • the engagement point is determined such that blast generated by explosion of the projectile's warhead will most probably discharge the threat's warhead before it reaches the platform.
  • operation 320 includes calculation, for each moving object whether it is expected to intercept and collide with the helicopter 100 or not, at the predicted flight path of the helicopter 100.
  • the moving objects which are determined to have a trajectory relative to the helicopter 100 that does not present a threat thereto, and will fly at a safe enough distance that even if it detonates no damage may be expected to the helicopter, may optionally be ignored, or optionally destroyed.
  • a command signal is generated and transmitted to the battery 40 for launching one or more interceptor projectiles 41 to counter the threat.
  • Operation 330 - CM (countermeasure) analysis and generation of a fire control command Upon identification of the threat and the determination of a suitable engagement point, a suitable countermeasure device is also determined.
  • the following control parameters are considered in order to determined the suitable CM device: time of launch; direction of launch; selection of battery from which the projectile is to be launched; selection of a specific projectile from a specific battery to be launched; determination of number and order of projectiles to be launched; explosion time of projectile's warhead; updated guidance information.
  • a result of an approach analysis e.g. identifying a threat approaching the platform (as opposeed to detection of a non-approaching threat in the vicinity of the platform) will dictate the reaction of the protection system.
  • Three non-limiting examples of the above are: (i) in response to approach detection and above a predefined threshold closing velocity and/or range and/or direction, a projectile will be launched from the platform without performance of preliminary platform maneuver; (ii) in formation flight, each platform conduct approach analysis that includes identification of approach toward the platform as well as toward the formation, based upon the platform role in the formation; and (iii) in response to approach detection and above a predefined threshold closing velocity and/or range and/or direction, a projectile will be launched from the platform even in a case where not enough radar data is measured in order to determined the engagement point and guidance data, prior to launch.
  • control parameters are considered, as follows: height of flight; formation flight details; terrain details; mission details and the like.
  • Such operational scenarios may encompass the following: detection and identification of a threat without launch of a countermeasure projectile (e.g. when such a launch may endanger other platforms or humans operating in the vicinity of the threatened platform; in formation flight, launch of a countermeasure projectile to intercept a threat endangering neighboring platform; in a networked environment, receiving alert of a threat and/or fire control command (including guidance information) from an external source (e.g. protection system mounted onboard another platform which is a member of the same network).
  • an external source e.g. protection system mounted onboard another platform which is a member of the same network.
  • the controller 30 may be adapted for operation when the helicopter is flying in proximity to other friendly aircraft including other helicopters, for example. Such proximity flying may include formation flying, for example.
  • the control unit 30 may be further adapted to identify whether other flying objects, e.g. as picked up by the helicopter radar, in particular radar system 20, and/or by using position information shared between friendly members of a communication network, are friendly aircraft. Having positively identified one or more friendly aircraft, the operation of the system 10 may be modified as follows. First, the controller 30 generates location and trajectory data for each friendly aircraft from data provided by the radar system 20, in a similar manner to that described with respect to an aerial threat, mutatis mutandis.
  • the controller determines whether the interception trajectories for the projectiles 41, and their blast radius when neutralizing the aerial threat, would endanger the friendly aircraft, at their projected positions. If the determination is that no danger is posed, then the projectiles are launched as before. On the other hand, if the projectile trajectories, or their blast radius could cause damage, then a different course of action is taken, e.g. in the case of a UAV operating in proximity to other platforms or forces, a decision to sacrifice the threatened UAV in order to save the other forces or platforms, could be taken
  • Operation 340 - transmitting control command to the countermeasure system the projectile is preprogrammed with flight directions prior to launch.
  • the projectile is a guided rocket and guidance information is dynamically calculated and transmitted to the projectile (uplink communication).
  • the control command includes aiming instructions that will be carried out by a suitable aiming unit, for aiming the battery itself or parts thereof.
  • each projectile is assigned (e.g. by the controller, the radar or the battery) with an identity, and this identity is used (e.g. by the controller, radar, guidance system) for generating the appropriate guidance updates.
  • the identity of the projectile is also used for communicating with the projectile.
  • each projectile is assigned with an identity prior to launch. Upon launch the identity is used by all components of the active protection system in all processing operations relating to the same projectile.
  • the guidance information that is generated by the guidance system is respectively assigned with the identities of the projectiles that were launched, and each projectile is responsive to the guidance information that is assigned to its own identity.
  • control unit In order to simplify explanations, the operations carried out by the control unit were presented as discrete operations, carried out in a sequential manner. It should be understood that the above detailed control operations are carried out rapidly, in a dynamic and iterative manner. For example, the determination of the engagement point is done iteratively based on newly measured radar data, and updated guidance information is generated and transmitted to the projectile in a dynamic manner.
  • the control unit as well as the radar system are adapted for high update rate, in order to provide the projectile with rapid and accurate guidance updates, needed to intercept the target e.g. at 30-50 meters away from the helicopter in about 300 milliseconds.
  • the protection system is integrated or designed to interface with platform systems and instrumentation, such that information collected by these systems is available to the protection system.
  • platform data e.g. speed, direction of flight, attitude, altitude and so on
  • the protection system may include additional elements to those described above with reference to Fig. 2, in order to autonomously acquire all necessary information.
  • the aforesaid reaction time of the system 10 may be defined as the minimum elapsed time required by the system 10 to identify a threat, calculate an interception trajectory for a projectile 41 based on the trajectory of the threat and of the helicopter, and launch at least one missile so that it destroys or neutralize the threat at a sufficiently spaced distance from the helicopter such that the blast, and possible debris created thereby, will not damage the helicopter.
  • Such a reaction time may be, for certain operational needs, for example from a few milliseconds, tens and hundreds of milliseconds up to a few seconds, as the operational requirements dictate, and the blast may be required to be more than 30 meters away from the helicopter 100.
  • the protection system is designed with a highly accurate, wide angle multi-beam or phased-array radar system capable of detection, identification, tracking and fire control.
  • the radar system is designed with several sensors located on different locations onboard the platform.
  • the radar is capable of providing very accurate output data in a relatively very short time.
  • the countermeasure system preferably is designed to have several batteries of projectiles located at different locations onboard the platform, thus enabling selecting the suitable countermeasure projectile which provides maximum kill success.
  • Good reaction time is also achieved due to the efficient control processing schemes, e,g, as described above with reference to Fig. 3.
  • Good reaction time is achieved by aiming the projectile battery - or parts thereof - prior to launce.
  • the use of guided or self- guided (maneuvering) projectiles together with efficient guidance processing further reduce reaction time.
  • the radar system 20 is critical to the effectiveness of the protection system 10, and the operation parameters of the radar system are defined, at least in part, by the type of threat and a minimum safety distance R away from the helicopter 100 at which the threat 120 can be intercepted.
  • the engagement distance R may be determined from a variety of factors such as, for example, the sensitivity of the radar system 20, the time necessary to actuate the countermeasure system 40 to launch the projectile 41, the effectiveness, accuracy acceleration and speed of the projectile 41, and the nature of the platform 100 to be protected.
  • the system 10 may be configured for operation with any other suitable aircraft, including small or large, manned or unmanned, fixed wing or rotor aircraft, or balloons or other types of air vehicles.
  • the system 10 may be configured for operation at a location for the protection thereof, for example a building, communication or radar installation, a camp, and so on, in a similar manner to that described above, mutatis mutandis, with the optional difference that weight constraints may be even more relaxed than in the case of moving vehicles, and furthermore, the radar system 20, controller 30 and batteries may optionally be significantly distanced one from another.
  • a central radar system may be provided in a camp, while at the same time providing a plurality of batteries at the periphery of the camp.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)
  • Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention se rapporte à un système et à un procédé de protection active conçus de préférence pour les plates-formes aériennes. Selon un mode de réalisation de l'invention, le système de protection active est monté à bord d'une plate-forme et vise à protéger ladite plate-forme. Il comprend un système radar configuré pour générer des données de sortie incluant des données sur les menaces correspondant à la vitesse, à la distance et à l'angle d'une menace par rapport à la plate-forme et dans un espace aérien donné autour de la plate-forme. Les données de sortie sont utiles pour détecter, identifier et surveiller au moins une menace à proximité de la plate-forme. Le système de protection active comprend également un système de contre-mesure capable de lancer au moins un projectile intercepteur sans fragmentation lorsqu'il en reçoit la commande. Il comprend enfin une unité de contrôle conçue pour recevoir les données de sortie provenant du système radar, pour générer la commande de contrôle et la transmettre audit au moins un projectile intercepteur sans fragmentation, et permettre ainsi de contrer la menace.
PCT/IL2007/001153 2006-09-20 2007-09-20 Procédé et système de protection active WO2008035338A2 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/442,053 US20100026554A1 (en) 2006-09-20 2007-09-20 Active protection method and system

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
IL178221 2006-09-20
IL178221A IL178221A0 (en) 2006-09-20 2006-09-20 Active protection method and system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2008035338A2 true WO2008035338A2 (fr) 2008-03-27
WO2008035338A3 WO2008035338A3 (fr) 2008-05-22

Family

ID=39092931

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/IL2007/001153 WO2008035338A2 (fr) 2006-09-20 2007-09-20 Procédé et système de protection active

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US20100026554A1 (fr)
IL (1) IL178221A0 (fr)
WO (1) WO2008035338A2 (fr)

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2010147520A1 (fr) 2009-06-16 2010-12-23 Saab Ab Système, appareil et procédé pour la protection d'un véhicule contre une menace éventuelle
ITTO20090790A1 (it) * 2009-10-20 2011-04-21 Oto Melara Spa Sistema elettronico per l'identificazione e la neutralizzazione di minacce in un'area predefinita
WO2014197038A1 (fr) * 2013-03-15 2014-12-11 Alliant Techsystems Inc. Procédés et appareils pour l'interception aérienne de menaces aériennes
US9170070B2 (en) 2012-03-02 2015-10-27 Orbital Atk, Inc. Methods and apparatuses for active protection from aerial threats
EP2150836B1 (fr) 2007-05-14 2015-11-04 Raytheon Company Procédés et dispositif de sélection d'une cible à partir de données de poursuite radar
US9501055B2 (en) 2012-03-02 2016-11-22 Orbital Atk, Inc. Methods and apparatuses for engagement management of aerial threats
US9551552B2 (en) 2012-03-02 2017-01-24 Orbital Atk, Inc. Methods and apparatuses for aerial interception of aerial threats
US11313650B2 (en) 2012-03-02 2022-04-26 Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation Methods and apparatuses for aerial interception of aerial threats
US11947349B2 (en) 2012-03-02 2024-04-02 Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation Methods and apparatuses for engagement management of aerial threats

Families Citing this family (30)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8245928B2 (en) * 2008-10-23 2012-08-21 Lockheed Martin Corporation Dual band threat warning system
US8423336B2 (en) * 2009-12-16 2013-04-16 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Aerodynamic simulation system and method for objects dispensed from an aircraft
EP2348276A1 (fr) * 2010-01-20 2011-07-27 Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH Système et méthode pour générer et évaluer des profils de risques spécifiques à une situation et initier une action appropriée pour protéger un véhicule
US8464949B2 (en) * 2011-02-24 2013-06-18 Raytheon Company Method and system for countering an incoming threat
JP5818479B2 (ja) * 2011-03-29 2015-11-18 三菱重工業株式会社 管制装置、表示装置、協調運用システム、及び管制方法
DE102011109658A1 (de) * 2011-08-08 2013-02-14 Rheinmetall Air Defence Ag Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Schutz von Objekten
FR2989204B1 (fr) * 2012-04-06 2014-04-11 Thales Sa Procede de determination d'une zone d'occupation probable instantanee ou anticipee d'un aeronef dans une zone de navigation aeroportuaire
US9632168B2 (en) 2012-06-19 2017-04-25 Lockheed Martin Corporation Visual disruption system, method, and computer program product
US9714815B2 (en) 2012-06-19 2017-07-25 Lockheed Martin Corporation Visual disruption network and system, method, and computer program product thereof
US9019375B1 (en) 2012-07-10 2015-04-28 The Boeing Company Target locator and interceptor imaging and sensing assembly, system and method
US9204104B1 (en) 2012-07-10 2015-12-01 The Boeing Company Imaging and sensing assembly, system and method
RU2013146664A (ru) * 2012-10-17 2015-04-27 Плазан Саса Лтд. Система активной защиты
WO2014093462A1 (fr) * 2012-12-12 2014-06-19 Alliant Techsystems Inc. Procédés et appareils pour la gestion d'engagement de menaces aériennes
US9103628B1 (en) 2013-03-14 2015-08-11 Lockheed Martin Corporation System, method, and computer program product for hostile fire strike indication
US9146251B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2015-09-29 Lockheed Martin Corporation System, method, and computer program product for indicating hostile fire
US9196041B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2015-11-24 Lockheed Martin Corporation System, method, and computer program product for indicating hostile fire
US10289761B1 (en) * 2013-06-12 2019-05-14 The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Method for modeling dynamic trajectories of guided, self-propelled moving bodies
US9753123B2 (en) * 2014-12-11 2017-09-05 Raytheon Company System and method to provide a dynamic situational awareness of attack radar threats
KR102417610B1 (ko) 2016-03-03 2022-07-07 삼성전자주식회사 근거리 초고주파 레이더를 이용한 코드 판독 방법 및 장치
US20220034633A1 (en) * 2017-05-29 2022-02-03 Plasan Sasa Ltd. Drone-Based Active Protection System
CN109613530B (zh) * 2018-12-21 2021-08-24 航天科工微电子系统研究院有限公司 一种低小慢空中目标多源信息融合的管控方法
US11099266B2 (en) * 2019-01-11 2021-08-24 International Business Machines Corporation Trajectory based threat alerting with friendly device augmentation
SE545273C2 (sv) * 2019-09-30 2023-06-13 Bae Systems Bofors Ab Metod för optimering av brisadpunkt samt vapensystem
SE543742C2 (sv) * 2020-02-17 2021-07-06 Bae Systems Bofors Ab Metod för eldledning av eldrörsluftvän samt ett eldledningssystem
CN113359847B (zh) * 2021-07-06 2022-03-11 中交遥感天域科技江苏有限公司 基于无线电遥感技术的无人机反制方法、系统和存储介质
CN113866762B (zh) * 2021-11-04 2022-10-18 济钢防务技术有限公司 一种基于雷达探测信息的无人机威胁判定方法
CN114448737B (zh) * 2022-04-11 2022-08-05 北京安盟信息技术股份有限公司 一种机床信息安全主动防护方法及系统
CN114849108B (zh) * 2022-07-06 2022-11-11 四川坤弘远祥科技有限公司 一种非贮压式抑爆系统的控制系统
SE2200135A1 (sv) * 2022-11-23 2024-05-24 Bae Systems Bofors Ab Adaptiva skottmönster
SE2300060A1 (sv) * 2023-06-26 2024-12-27 Bae Systems Bofors Ab Metod för eldledning

Family Cites Families (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2129948B1 (fr) * 1971-03-23 1976-06-11 Thomson Csf
US3956748A (en) * 1972-12-29 1976-05-11 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Omnidirectional tracking weapon control system
US5112006A (en) * 1975-03-12 1992-05-12 The Boeing Company Self defense missile
US4233605A (en) * 1979-02-15 1980-11-11 Northrop Corporation Helicopter radar decoy
DE3004633A1 (de) * 1980-02-08 1981-08-13 Licentia Patent-Verwaltungs-Gmbh, 6000 Frankfurt Feuerleitsystem gegen auch tiefstfliegende zielobjekte
US4641801A (en) * 1982-04-21 1987-02-10 Lynch Jr David D Terminally guided weapon delivery system
US4715263A (en) * 1985-12-30 1987-12-29 Mcdonnell Douglas Helicopter Co. Roll turret for a gun mount
FR2627269B1 (fr) * 1988-02-17 1993-05-14 Thomson Csf Systeme de correction de la trajectoire d'un projectile
US5180881A (en) * 1991-06-12 1993-01-19 Electronics & Space Corp. Beam steered laser for fire control
US5219133A (en) * 1992-04-03 1993-06-15 Christian Allen B Lone attack aircraft defense system
US5411225A (en) * 1993-07-26 1995-05-02 Lannon; Robert G. Reusable non-pyrotechnic countermeasure dispenser cartridge for aircraft
DE4426014B4 (de) * 1994-07-22 2004-09-30 Diehl Stiftung & Co.Kg System zum Schutz eines Zieles gegen Flugkörper
IL117589A (en) * 1996-03-21 2001-10-31 Israel Aircraft Ind Ltd Air-to-air missile guidance system
FR2807841B1 (fr) * 2000-04-18 2003-10-03 Thomson Csf Radar a imagerie bas cout a haute resolution
US6653972B1 (en) * 2002-05-09 2003-11-25 Raytheon Company All weather precision guidance of distributed projectiles
DE10229273B4 (de) * 2002-06-28 2007-01-25 Diehl Bgt Defence Gmbh & Co. Kg Objekt-Selbstschutzvorrichtung
US7104496B2 (en) * 2004-02-26 2006-09-12 Chang Industry, Inc. Active protection device and associated apparatus, system, and method
US7066427B2 (en) * 2004-02-26 2006-06-27 Chang Industry, Inc. Active protection device and associated apparatus, system, and method
US6980151B1 (en) * 2004-06-14 2005-12-27 General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems, Inc. System and method for onboard detection of ballistic threats to aircraft
US7059567B1 (en) * 2005-02-02 2006-06-13 Dino Scorziello Small weapons shield for helicopters
US7504982B2 (en) * 2005-12-06 2009-03-17 Raytheon Company Anti-Missile system and method
US7977614B2 (en) * 2006-09-03 2011-07-12 E.C.S. Engineering Consulting Services-Aerospace Ltd. Method and system for defense against incoming rockets and missiles

Cited By (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2150836B1 (fr) 2007-05-14 2015-11-04 Raytheon Company Procédés et dispositif de sélection d'une cible à partir de données de poursuite radar
WO2010147520A1 (fr) 2009-06-16 2010-12-23 Saab Ab Système, appareil et procédé pour la protection d'un véhicule contre une menace éventuelle
EP2443412A4 (fr) * 2009-06-16 2015-05-27 Saab Ab Système, appareil et procédé pour la protection d'un véhicule contre une menace éventuelle
ITTO20090790A1 (it) * 2009-10-20 2011-04-21 Oto Melara Spa Sistema elettronico per l'identificazione e la neutralizzazione di minacce in un'area predefinita
US10228689B2 (en) 2012-03-02 2019-03-12 Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems, Inc. Methods and apparatuses for engagement management of aerial threats
US9170070B2 (en) 2012-03-02 2015-10-27 Orbital Atk, Inc. Methods and apparatuses for active protection from aerial threats
US9501055B2 (en) 2012-03-02 2016-11-22 Orbital Atk, Inc. Methods and apparatuses for engagement management of aerial threats
US9551552B2 (en) 2012-03-02 2017-01-24 Orbital Atk, Inc. Methods and apparatuses for aerial interception of aerial threats
US10295312B2 (en) 2012-03-02 2019-05-21 Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems, Inc. Methods and apparatuses for active protection from aerial threats
US10436554B2 (en) 2012-03-02 2019-10-08 Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems, Inc. Methods and apparatuses for aerial interception of aerial threats
US10948909B2 (en) 2012-03-02 2021-03-16 Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems, Inc. Methods and apparatuses for engagement management of aerial threats
US10982935B2 (en) 2012-03-02 2021-04-20 Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation Methods and apparatuses for active protection from aerial threats
US11313650B2 (en) 2012-03-02 2022-04-26 Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation Methods and apparatuses for aerial interception of aerial threats
US11947349B2 (en) 2012-03-02 2024-04-02 Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation Methods and apparatuses for engagement management of aerial threats
US11994367B2 (en) 2012-03-02 2024-05-28 Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation Methods and apparatuses for aerial interception of aerial threats
US12025408B2 (en) 2012-03-02 2024-07-02 Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation Methods and apparatuses for active protection from aerial threats
WO2014197038A1 (fr) * 2013-03-15 2014-12-11 Alliant Techsystems Inc. Procédés et appareils pour l'interception aérienne de menaces aériennes

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
IL178221A0 (en) 2008-01-20
WO2008035338A3 (fr) 2008-05-22
US20100026554A1 (en) 2010-02-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20100026554A1 (en) Active protection method and system
EP3410057B1 (fr) Système de protection active basé sur un drone
US12025408B2 (en) Methods and apparatuses for active protection from aerial threats
AU2018203637B2 (en) An active protection system
US8464949B2 (en) Method and system for countering an incoming threat
EP2527865B1 (fr) Système, dispositif et procédé de protection des avions contre l'arrivée de missiles et de menaces
US7631833B1 (en) Smart counter asymmetric threat micromunition with autonomous target selection and homing
US10295312B2 (en) Methods and apparatuses for active protection from aerial threats
US20220034633A1 (en) Drone-Based Active Protection System
US12398982B2 (en) Incoming threat protection system and method of using same
Kallenborn et al. Breaking the shield: Countering drone defenses
WO2021236207A2 (fr) Applications de systèmes laser à impulsions ultracourtes
JP2023532299A (ja) 到来脅威防御システムおよびその使用方法
RU2601241C2 (ru) Способ активной защиты летательного аппарата и система для его осуществления (варианты)
KR20090131305A (ko) 전투용 헬기의 대공 미사일 요격 시스템
KR102831508B1 (ko) 하드킬 요격 시스템 기반의 물리적 대항 방어 시스템 및 이의 타겟 격추 방법
US20240247916A1 (en) Active protection against beam-riding guided munition
Shi et al. Effectiveness evaluation about self-screening jamming of assaulting aircraft in complex EM environment
Wong Systems engineering approach to ground combat vehicle survivability in urban operations
Mk Thales to showcase Flycatcher Mk2 and STARStreak at Defexpo
Langham et al. Unmanned Tactical Air Vehicles-An Electronic Combat Perspective
Two LESSON 1. INTRODUCTION TO THE IMPROVED NlKE HERCULESE MISSILE SYSTEM

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 07805611

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2

DPE1 Request for preliminary examination filed after expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed from 20040101)
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 12442053

Country of ref document: US

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 07805611

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2