From: David G. <go...@us...> - 2002-10-09 01:10:55
|
Mathew Yeates wrote: > I take it that doc utils cannot currently be used for > extracting documentation from doc strings. Bummer. Yes, I haven't had time to get this going yet. I hope to get moving "real soon now". You are (and anyone is) welcome to help out. Unfortunately, it requires knowledge of most of the Docutils system and more beyond, so I don't expect to be inundated with voluteers. > This will be an awesome feature when it finally makes it in. I hope so! > In the meantime, what is everybody using for python documentation? I'm not using anything except for the source itself, in anticipation of eventually using Docutils. But there are several other tools out there, such as HappyDoc (http://happydoc.sf.net) and epydoc (http://epydoc.sf.net). Only Docutils uses reStructuredText though. -- David Goodger <go...@us...> Open-source projects: - Python Docutils: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/ (includes reStructuredText: http://docutils.sf.net/rst.html) - The Go Tools Project: http://gotools.sourceforge.net/ |