Re: [PyMOL] count_atoms and states

Hi,

Thank you for your effort.

This would be the very best option? Thinking the use case that users need
all the states would be a lot harder.

I would rather let state 0 refer to all the states like now, but upper
nonexistent states give an error. This would remove some errors by 1, and
would work as is for single state objects.

Em qui, 15 de ago de 2019 05:56, Thomas Holder <
tho...@sc...> escreveu:

>
> > On Aug 12, 2019, at 2:56 PM, Christian Cole French <
> chr...@sc...> wrote:
> >
> > Maybe the nonexistent state warning is something that should be
> implemented elsewhere as well.
>
> Selecting state 0 is now an error:
>
>
> https://github.com/schrodinger/pymol-open-source/commit/c09ce287d447e6c703e57d31ae3e5d53f8359ee1
>
> Cheers,
>   Thomas
>
> --
> Thomas Holder
> PyMOL Principal Developer
> Schrödinger, Inc.
>
>