Astro by Astronomer Reviews & Product Details - Page 3

Astro reduces the necessity for a dedicated DevOps team member. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some of the tasks provided by Astro have more limited capabilities compared to Airflow, and in certain areas, such as alerts, they are not as effective. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Management of the deployments and in general the documentation Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The DAGs view from the Astro website. I prefer to jump directly into the Airflow deployment to find the DAGs that I want Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think the UI UX is well designed for someone new to understand the product quickly and use it seamlessly Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

When too many jobs are done on a single day at similar times the astronomer may crash Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The platform offers straightforward code deployment and provides managed Airflow, making it convenient to set up and maintain workflows. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The cost is quite high, but it does save a significant amount of time when setting up Airflow. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

User-friendly interface, improving workflow management and ease of adoption. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

High learning curve for new users, requiring more time to explain concepts. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

User friendly UX and Reliable Infra using Kubernetes Cluster Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Lots of cases, I have to go into Airflow UI for trouble shooting and debugging Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Great support. Leading the changes in Airflow Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The cost is somewhat high, but I appreciate not having to manage the infrastructure myself. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like that its managed, and its the best way to get into airflow by far. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Not as transparent in terms of pricing, i can host airflow locally myself and save money. They have to work more to support the core features for the enterprise. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We have used the astronmer environment for the airflow , it's easier and flexible Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I worked as associate level. All are good Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

With Astronomer we don't need to worry about the infrastructure, everything is abstracted to us, we just need to click a few times to implement a new deployment (very easy) access the Astronomer UI, and start doing things. This improved our team's speed to develop new solutions a lot! Astronomer became our daily tool for workflow management. Avoiding wasting time with deployments and machines and focusing on what is truly important, the business. Having the most recent version of airflow available one day after the release is a plus, we can count on the bug fixes and new features as fast as possible (faster than if we had our airflow solution or any other SaaS). The airflow support team has helped us to unblock many problems, most of them about how Airflow works and the best use of the tool, also we were able to deploy easily every single integration that we use with our current cloud provider. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Astronomer still lacks some "premium features", something that is not available at opensource version of Airflow. I know that we have some extra tools like lineage (this one needs a lot more of attention from astronomers team to be something easy and valid to use) and the "cloud ide" which is a great idea however needs more completeness, for example it lacks the ability to simply install private libraries or connect with macro functions (like jinja) from our SQL definition. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.