What G2 users dislike about MicroStation:
"MicroStation has some drawbacks, like the lack of key-in commands similar to AutoCAD and a shortage of logical, intuitive shortcuts. The buttons aren’t always clearly labeled, which often leads to searching for the tools. Additionally, the GUI appears outdated, resembling the style of Windows 98 or XP. While this might optimize processing power, it’s time to upgrade to a more modern and user-friendly interface."
- MicroStation Review, Kristjan G.
3. GeoHECRAS: Best for hydraulic modeling
GeoHECRAS is a powerful tool for hydraulic modeling, especially in the context of floodplain management and infrastructure planning. According to G2 Data, 87% G2 users value its Hydrologic and Hydrolic capabilities.
Based on my review of G2 user feedback, this software is particularly effective for simulating water surface profiles in both steady and unsteady flow conditions. Many G2 users emphasize the importance of this feature for real-world applications, such as bridge crossings, stream restorations, and FEMA floodplain assessments, where precision is crucial.
One feature that I see getting a lot of praise is the georeferencing tool, which allows models to align accurately with real-world map coordinates. G2 users often emphasize the importance of spatial accuracy in projects such as infrastructure placement or flood risk zoning, where even minor misalignments can lead to significant downstream issues. This tool seems to help minimize these risks by ensuring precise data alignment.
I frequently see G2 reviewers highlight how support for 1D, 2D, and hybrid 1D-2D HEC-RAS modeling adds flexibility to the tool. This adaptability enables professionals to select the modeling approach best suited for their project, whether it involves a straightforward channel or a complex urban flood system. According to users, this flexibility ensures that hydraulic modeling remains accurate without unnecessarily complicating the process.
Based on feedback I gathered from G2 users, there’s a lot of love for GeoHECRAS’s integration with GIS platforms. Many users appreciate how easily data can be transferred between GeoHECRAS and GIS tools, which is critical for maintaining consistency across platforms. This interoperability helps ensure that the outputs remain reliable and aligned with the latest data sources, reducing the risk of errors and redundant effort.
Another feature that I’ve seen praised is the digital terrain cross-section tool. Users often highlight its ability to extract cross-sections directly from 3D terrain data, which is especially beneficial for engineers and planners working with complex topographies. This feature seems to significantly improve modeling accuracy and reduce the manual workload, which many G2 reviewers find valuable.
Visualization capabilities are also frequently mentioned in G2 reviews as a standout feature. Users appreciate the tool’s ability to produce clear, detailed representations of water surface profiles and flow paths, making it easier to present technical results to stakeholders. These visuals seem to help bridge the gap between complex technical analysis and real-world decision-making, a feature that several reviewers find especially useful when working with regulatory bodies or non-technical audiences.
However, many G2 users have noted that the user manual could be more comprehensive. While online tutorials provide helpful guidance for beginners, some reviewers mention that advanced tasks aren’t always fully covered. Enhancing the documentation could reduce the learning curve and make the software even more accessible to new users, though the existing resources still provide solid foundational guidance.
One area that several G2 reviewers mention is error-checking and input validation. While the software includes useful safeguards, verifying data accuracy sometimes requires manual effort. Automating more of this process could improve efficiency for high-volume datasets, but the current system still helps maintain reliable results.
Another recurring challenge that G2 users highlight is setting up survey coordinates and integrating spatial data. While the software manages most scenarios effectively, some users encounter minor issues when aligning multiple datasets. Improving this integration could reduce inconsistencies, though for many projects, the existing functionality works well.
Finally, I’ve read that several G2 users feel that while GeoHECRAS covers core hydraulic modeling needs, some advanced features—like sediment transport and detailed groundwater interaction—could be expanded. Enhancing these capabilities would better support multidisciplinary water resource analyses, yet the platform still provides strong performance for standard hydraulic modeling tasks.
What I like about GeoHECRAS:
- One feature I frequently see getting a lot of praise is the georeferencing tool. Users highlight its ability to align models accurately with real-world map coordinates, ensuring spatial accuracy in flood risk zoning and infrastructure placement.
- One aspect that stands out to me in the reviews is the integration with GIS platforms. Many G2 users appreciate how smoothly data can be transferred between GeoHECRAS and GIS tools, ensuring consistency and reducing errors across platforms.
What G2 users like about GeoHECRAS:
"GeoHECRAS is excellent for modeling drainage areas and complex floodplains, with its integration of GIS and mapping features making it much more user-friendly than HEC-RAS alone. The ability to import files from Google Earth and CAD streamlines the process, allowing you to consolidate existing survey data and areas in one place. The program is highly intuitive, with tools and features located exactly where you’d expect them. Our team uses it almost daily, and when crashes or bugs occur, CivilGeo’s support is quick and helpful."
- GeoHECRAS Review, Sarah K.
What I dislike about GeoHECRAS:
- I’ve noticed that the user manual could be more comprehensive. While online tutorials provide helpful guidance, several G2 reviewers mention that advanced tasks aren’t fully covered, though the existing resources still offer solid foundational support.
- Verifying data accuracy sometimes requires manual effort, which I’ve found a bit time-consuming. Multiple G2 users have highlighted this as well, and automating more error-checking could improve efficiency, even though the current safeguards generally maintain reliable results.
What G2 users dislike about GeoHECRAS:
"Some aspects of its 3D visualization could use improvement. For example, culverts designed with the 1D modeling approach don’t display accurately in the 3D view within a terrain."
- GeoHECRAS Review, Baylor W.
4. GeoHECHMS: Best for diverse hydrological scenarios
GeoHECHMS is often regarded as a highly capable tool for stormwater modeling, especially for analyzing complex hydrological conditions. Based on my review of G2 user feedback, many reviewers share an appreciation for its flexibility and ability to handle various stormwater design scenarios. Although I’ve not used it on active projects, users consistently highlight its potential to provide confidence in stormwater design across various landscapes.
A feature that stands out in the reviews is the automated calculation of the curve number (CN). I’ve read multiple G2 reviews praising this tool for its ability to streamline the process by automatically determining composite curve numbers based on land use and soil type. This automation appears to save a significant amount of time and substantially reduces the likelihood of errors, which users find invaluable in their tasks.
Another aspect that many G2 users highlight is the ease of comparing stormwater scenarios side by side. Whether for pre- and post-development conditions or testing different design options, this feature is frequently mentioned as a way to visualize potential impacts. I’ve noticed that it’s especially useful when presenting design choices to stakeholders, as it provides a clear and straightforward comparison of different outcomes.
From what I’ve gathered, GeoHECHMS' integration with CAD and GIS platforms is another standout feature. The seamless exchange of data between these systems eliminates the usual back-and-forth of file conversions, a point often praised in G2 reviews. Users emphasize that this integration helps maintain alignment between hydrological models and original design files, improving both efficiency and accuracy.
However, G2 reviews also point out areas for improvement. For example, I’ve noticed several users highlight terrain delineation on flatter sites as an area that could be refined. While the tool is generally effective, small variations may occasionally be missed, requiring minor manual corrections.
The manual watershed delineation is flexible, but working with closed polylines in CAD can be somewhat tedious. Some users suggest a more intuitive drawing tool to streamline this process, though the current workflow still accomplishes the task reliably.
Another feature that could use refinement, according to feedback I gathered, is automatic subbasin delineation and time of concentration (TOC) tools. There are instances where certain areas or junctions are overlooked during the automatic delineation process.
Improving these tools could enhance efficiency and reduce the need for manual adjustments, while the existing functionality continues to handle most common scenarios effectively.
I’ve seen a few reviewers mention the alert system for disconnected junctions, which serves as a useful safeguard. Some users feel it could be slightly more proactive, as changes affecting model connectivity aren’t always immediately flagged. Even so, the alert system effectively identifies issues when triggered, and a more responsive setup would simply enhance an already helpful feature.
What I like about GeoHECHMS:
- Based on my review of G2 feedback, I frequently see users highlighting the automated curve number (CN) calculation. They appreciate how it automatically determines composite curve numbers, saving time and minimizing errors in their workflows.
- One aspect that stands out to me in the reviews is the integration with CAD and GIS platforms. Many users praise how seamlessly the data exchange occurs between these systems, which helps improve efficiency and ensures consistency between the hydrological models and the original design files.
What G2 users like about GeoHECHMS:
"GeoHECHMS is built on a robust mapping system that supports a wide range of file formats, including Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI), Autodesk, Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR), and many others. Despite the complexity of the subject matter, its interface is refreshingly straightforward, making it accessible to users without requiring extensive technical expertise. This user-centric design sets a high standard, and other software vendors could learn from how CivilGeo develops tools tailored to end-users rather than just computer scientists."
- GeoHECHMS Review, Kenneth D.
What I dislike about GeoHECHMS:
- I’ve noticed that the user manual could be more comprehensive. While online tutorials provide helpful guidance, several G2 reviewers mention that advanced tasks aren’t fully covered, though the existing resources still offer solid foundational support.
- Verifying data accuracy sometimes requires manual effort, which I’ve found a bit time-consuming. Multiple G2 users have highlighted this as well, and automating more error-checking could improve efficiency, even though the current safeguards generally maintain reliable results.
What G2 users dislike about GeoHECHMS:
"The development of fractional Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) rainfall distributions is not very intuitive. Additionally, including better watershed maps in the reporting output would significantly enhance its usability and clarity."
- GeoHECHMS Review, John G.
5. Civil 3D: Best for road, grading, and utility design
Autodesk Civil 3D has long been considered an indispensable tool in the civil engineering field, particularly for its design automation tools, such as surface modeling, grading, and alignment creation.
From what I’ve seen in G2 reviews, users frequently highlight how these features automate repetitive tasks, reducing human error and freeing up time to focus on more complex aspects, such as design optimization and analysis.
A feature that consistently stands out in G2 reviews is its collaboration capabilities. Many users mention how well Civil 3D integrates with other Autodesk tools like AutoCAD and Revit, which seems essential for teams working collaboratively on the same project in real-time. This interoperability is often praised as a key strength, especially when it comes to seamless cross-tool workflows.
Another commonly appreciated feature is its support for industry-standard file formats such as IFC and LandXML. I’ve noticed that users often mention how this support helps facilitate smooth data sharing across different platforms, without running into compatibility issues. This seems particularly important for larger teams working with a diverse set of software tools, according to G2 reviews. According to G2 Data, 91% users value its ability to import and export different file formats.
A recurring theme in G2 feedback is the integration of GIS features. Users highlight how linking design elements with geospatial data enhances location-based analyses, such as flood risk assessments and terrain modeling. This functionality is particularly useful in infrastructure and site planning, as it enables users to better understand the spatial relationships within their designs.
From my review of G2 feedback, I’ve come across multiple reviewers pointing out the steep learning curve. Even experienced professionals mention that mastering the software’s commands and settings takes time, with many users relying on online tutorials and forums. Based on this feedback, it seems that improvements in in-app documentation or contextual help could greatly ease the learning process for new users.
In terms of challenges, I’ve noticed several reviewers mention the hatching tool, particularly when dealing with dense or overlapping entities. While functional, it can sometimes slow down the final drafting stages. Many users have suggested improvements to its consistency, which could further enhance the drafting process, though the tool still performs well for standard use cases.
Another area highlighted in the feedback is the customization of pointers and selection tools. The default crossing box can feel inefficient for large or detailed drawings, and users would benefit from more control over how they interact with design elements. Even so, the existing tools handle most civil engineering layouts effectively, and improvements would simply make them more streamlined.
Finally, I’ve seen a lot of positive feedback surrounding Civil 3D’s pipe network design capabilities. While customization can be tricky at first, once mastered, it provides excellent precision and control over stormwater and sewer systems. Many G2 users view this feature as a standout capability, demonstrating strong value for effective network layout and functionality.
What I like about Civil 3D:
- I frequently see G2 reviewers highlight the design automation tools like surface modeling, grading, and alignment creation. Users appreciate how these features reduce human error and free up time for more complex tasks.
- Something G2 reviewers seem to really appreciate is the collaboration capabilities. Many users call out the integration with AutoCAD and Revit, making cross-tool workflows seamless for teams working on shared projects in real-time.
What G2 users about Civil 3D:
"This software enables dynamic integration for my building and road projects, allowing for realistic presentations with easily accessible built-in tools and add-on options that help cut costs and time. Once I create my library for BIM, it will benefit all my projects and make my work more presentable to clients and engineers. It is specifically tailored for civil engineering, with numerous inbuilt features that make my work more focused and efficient in the field."
- Civil 3D Review, Sagar V.
What I dislike about Civil 3D:
- I’ve noticed that the hatching tool can struggle with dense or overlapping entities. While it works for standard drafting, multiple G2 reviewers mention that improving its consistency would speed up the final stages, though it still performs adequately for most tasks.
- Pointer customization and selection tools can feel a bit limiting, especially the default crossing box for large drawings. Several G2 users have also noted this, and more control would streamline workflows, even though the current tools handle most civil engineering layouts effectively.
What G2 users dislike about Civil 3D:
"Pipe networks can be tricky to work with. There are several issues, starting with the display of pipes in profiles. The process isn’t very intuitive, and changing pipe slopes is a long and complicated task."
- Civil 3D Review, Jeremy J.
6. OpenRoads Designer: Best for comprehensive roadway design and analysis
OpenRoads Designer stands out for its ability to simplify road and infrastructure design using a model-centric approach. Based on my review of G2 user feedback, this approach is frequently praised for improving collaboration and streamlining workflows, particularly in large civil engineering projects. I’ve come across multiple reviewers who highlight how this method helps teams visualize and manage the entire project lifecycle more efficiently.
Something G2 reviewers seem to really appreciate is the ability to work with intelligent models that include terrain data and detailed roadway or site features. From what I’ve seen, this provides users with a more comprehensive understanding of complex infrastructure systems. Several reviews emphasize how this holistic design environment contributes to better project planning and execution.
A consistently praised capability is the integration of multiple data types within a unified platform. Many users on G2 highlight how OpenRoads Designer supports survey, drainage, utilities, and roadway design in one place—eliminating the need to toggle between separate tools. This seems to reduce both workflow interruptions and the potential for inconsistencies across project phases.
One standout capability, according to users, is the ability to start with real-world data and create georeferenced 3D models. This functionality appears especially valuable for highway and site development projects. I frequently see G2 reviewers mention that this leads to more accurate and realistic modeling, with immediate visual feedback enhancing their control and confidence during design iterations.
Another feature I see getting a lot of love is the platform’s flexibility in handling both 2D and 3D deliverables. According to feedback I gathered from G2 users, this adaptability helps the software scale well across diverse infrastructure projects. Whether teams are working on basic plan sets or detailed 3D corridors, the tool accommodates varying levels of complexity, which is especially helpful in multidisciplinary environments.
From what I’ve read, the surface modeling and corridor design tools are considered among the most precise and controllable in terms of modeling. Users frequently call out their usefulness in refining alignments, grading, and cross-section development.
However, I’ve also noticed that some users encounter minor challenges with surface creation, particularly when restoring broken links or managing dependencies. While these situations can require extra attention, the software still provides solid core functionality for most projects.
Examining the broader review trends, performance occasionally emerges as an area for improvement. Bugs or undocumented changes may cause unexpected behavior, and version compatibility can complicate project continuity. Even so, the platform generally performs reliably, and updates or careful version management help maintain smooth workflows.
Lastly, based on my review of G2 feedback, there’s an opportunity to enhance training resources and onboarding support. Better guidance for setting up seed files and overall orientation could make the platform even more accessible to new users. Many reviewers note an initial learning curve, but once familiar with it, the software provides strong capabilities for civil engineering workflows.
What I like about OpenRoads Designer:
- From what I’ve gathered in G2 reviews, users appreciate how OpenRoads Designer simplifies complex projects by integrating multiple data types in one platform. This makes it easier for me to collaborate without switching tools constantly.
- I’ve noticed that many users highlight the value of starting with real-world data and creating 3D models. I can see how this approach helps improve accuracy and boosts my confidence in the design process.
What G2 users like about OpenRoads Designer:
"OpenRoads Designer provides an efficient solution for developing 3D models, automatically creating project elements in a 3D environment as you work. This enables you to consolidate all project components, including roadways, structures, drainage networks, and utilities, in a single location. The detailed 3D models help users of all experience levels visually review a project for potential issues and omissions. Civil cells enable the duplication of redundant design elements, such as entrances and pedestrian ramps. Item Types can be used to add additional metadata, such as bid item descriptions and specification notes, to elements within the model."
- OpenRoads Designer Review, Mike M.
What I dislike about OpenRoads Designer:
- I’ve noticed that surface creation can be tricky, especially when restoring broken links or managing dependencies. Multiple G2 reviewers also mention this, although the software still handles core functionality reliably for most projects.
- Performance and version compatibility issues can sometimes cause unexpected problems. Several G2 users highlight this too, and while updates help maintain smooth workflows, occasional refinements could improve overall stability.
What G2 users dislike about OpenRoads Designer:
"While the program offers vast capabilities, the previous user interface used for creating project record documents in OpenRoads Designer is more cumbersome and heavily reliant on menu trees. Changes made specifically for drawings can’t be easily migrated to the workspace for universal use in other files, which adds extra complexity to the process."
- OpenRoads Designer Review, Glenn B.
Best civil engineering design software: frequently asked questions (FAQs)
Q. Can civil engineering design software integrate with other tools?
Yes, many civil engineering design software tools can integrate with other applications, such as project management software, BIM tools, and CAD systems like AutoCAD, Revit, and STAAD Pro.
Q. Does civil engineering design software support sustainability or green building design?
Many civil engineering design software tools incorporate features such as energy modeling, material lifecycle analysis, and environmental impact assessments, enabling engineers to design more sustainable and energy-efficient buildings and infrastructure.
Q. Is training available for civil engineering design software?
Yes, most civil engineering design software providers offer training resources, including online tutorials, webinars, and certification programs. Many also offer in-person training sessions, user manuals, and community forums to help users improve their skills and navigate the software efficiently.
Q. Which are the best free civil engineering design software?
Most civil engineering design software tools offer free trials, but very few are completely free. Some tools, like Civil 3D, provide limited functionality in their free versions, suitable for smaller projects or educational purposes. Explore free civil engineering design software.
Q. What are the common challenges I could face with civil engineering design software?
Common challenges with civil engineering design software include a steep learning curve, especially for complex tools, compatibility issues with other software, high costs for advanced features, and the need for frequent software updates or maintenance. Additionally, data management and collaboration across different teams can sometimes be difficult if the software isn't well-integrated with other systems.
Make sure there’s a solid foundation
As structural engineer Bill Baker, who led the design of the Burj Khalifa, once said, “Engineering is not just about making things work, but making them work better.” This mindset is exactly what the best software delivers—it’s not just about meeting the basic requirements; it’s about enhancing how I would want to approach design, analysis, and project management.
Throughout my journey of evaluating the best civil engineering design software, I’ve realized that the right tools are much more than just a means to turn ideas into blueprints. They empower users to solve complex challenges in creative and efficient ways, helping them see beyond the obvious and approach design with a fresh perspective.
Civil engineering projects vary greatly in scope, complexity, and objectives. Whether designing a towering skyscraper, a complex bridge, or a more straightforward infrastructure project, the needs and challenges differ vastly. That’s why it’s crucial to explore different software options, thoroughly evaluate their features, and choose one that aligns with the specific needs of each project.
Use the best construction estimating software to streamline your budgeting and ensure your projects stay on track.
.png?width=1200&height=450&name=Untitled%20design%20(56).png)
