[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2003039090A2 - Method and apparatus for error correction in a data transmission system - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for error correction in a data transmission system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2003039090A2
WO2003039090A2 PCT/US2002/034961 US0234961W WO03039090A2 WO 2003039090 A2 WO2003039090 A2 WO 2003039090A2 US 0234961 W US0234961 W US 0234961W WO 03039090 A2 WO03039090 A2 WO 03039090A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
value
error
decision
transition
input signal
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2002/034961
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2003039090A3 (en
Inventor
Hiroshi Takatori
James Little
Scott Chiu
Original Assignee
Intel Corporation
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Intel Corporation filed Critical Intel Corporation
Priority to AU2002363157A priority Critical patent/AU2002363157A1/en
Publication of WO2003039090A2 publication Critical patent/WO2003039090A2/en
Publication of WO2003039090A3 publication Critical patent/WO2003039090A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L7/00Arrangements for synchronising receiver with transmitter
    • H04L7/0054Detection of the synchronisation error by features other than the received signal transition
    • H04L7/0062Detection of the synchronisation error by features other than the received signal transition detection of error based on data decision error, e.g. Mueller type detection
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L25/00Baseband systems
    • H04L25/02Details ; arrangements for supplying electrical power along data transmission lines
    • H04L25/06DC level restoring means; Bias distortion correction ; Decision circuits providing symbol by symbol detection
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L7/00Arrangements for synchronising receiver with transmitter
    • H04L7/02Speed or phase control by the received code signals, the signals containing no special synchronisation information
    • H04L7/033Speed or phase control by the received code signals, the signals containing no special synchronisation information using the transitions of the received signal to control the phase of the synchronising-signal-generating means, e.g. using a phase-locked loop
    • H04L7/0334Processing of samples having at least three levels, e.g. soft decisions

Definitions

  • the present invention generally relates to high-speed data transmission. More specifically, the present invention relates to correcting the jitter spectrum in a transmission system that requires stringent jitter tolerance over a wide range of jitter frequencies, such as the incoming signal of a 1.544 Megabit-per-second (Mbit) point-to-point dedicated, digital circuit (TI) system, which may have very large jitter due to the cascade of several TI links in the network.
  • Mbit Megabit-per-second
  • TI dedicated, digital circuit
  • Networking applications have become very popular in recent years, particularly in response to an explosion in the use and variety of networks employed in a vast array of computing environments. Accordingly, many advances have been made in the related technology in order to improve the quality of these networking systems. For example, fully integrated transceivers for TI network channel service units (CSUs) and integrated services digital network (ISDN) primary rate interface applications are known in the art and are presently commercially available. These devices, such as the Intel LXT360 Tl/El transceiver, are useful for networking applications, such as timing recovery in TI network systems.
  • CSUs TI network channel service units
  • ISDN integrated services digital network
  • These devices such as the Intel LXT360 Tl/El transceiver, are useful for networking applications, such as timing recovery in TI network systems.
  • Such obstacles may include exceptionally large amplitude jitter, a wide variation in data density, large amounts of cable attenuation, and imperfect equalization.
  • Jitter is the general term used to describe the noise or uncertainty in the period of incoming data in a communications system.
  • bits arrive at time increments that are integer multiples of a bit repetition time.
  • data pulses arrive at times that deviate from these integer multiples. This deviation may cause errors in the transmission of data, particularly when the data is transmitted at high speeds.
  • the deviation or variation may be in the amplitude, frequency, or phase of the data.
  • Jitter may occur due to a number of causes, including inter-symbol interference, frequency differences between the transmitter and receiver clock, noise, and the non-ideal behavior of the receiver and transmitter clock generation circuits. Jitter is a problem of particular import in digital communications systems. First, jitter causes the received signal to be sampled at a non-optimal sampling point. This occurrence reduces the signal-to-noise ratio at the receiver and thus limits the information rate. Second, in conventional systems, each receiver typically extracts its receive sampling clock from the incoming data signal. Jitter makes this task significantly more difficult. Third, in long-distance transmission systems, where multiple repeaters reside in a chain, jitter accumulates. That is, each receiver extracts a clock from the incoming bit stream, re-times the data, and re-transmits the data utilizing the recovered clock. Each subsequent receiver thus sees a progressively larger degree of input jitter.
  • the receiver phase lock loop When an incoming signal contains a large and high frequency jitter component, the receiver phase lock loop (RPLL) tends to lose its ability to accurately catch up to the incoming signal phase movement. When this RPLL misadjustment becomes larger than a certain amount of the symbol period, it causes symbol error.
  • the phase misadjustment can be understood as the phase error of the recovered clock phase from that of the incoming signal.
  • the timing margin is defined as the largest phase error that occurs without causing symbol error.
  • Figure 1 illustrates this scenario in terms of the data decision instance margin.
  • Figure 1 is a superposition of possible signal traces for two symbol periods out of a long random sequence of data and is referred to as an eye diagram.
  • the timing margin shown in Figure 1 is from time TI to T3, where T2 is the optimal decision instance.
  • phase error causes the data decision to be made either before TI or after T3, then the data decision might be erroneous. In that case, the receiver starts making errors due to inter- symbol interference. Generally, this occurs when the phase error exceeds 40% of the symbol period, which is to the left of time TI and to the right of T3 in Figure 1.
  • Fig. 1 illustrates a time domain eye diagram with signal traces for two symbol periods out of a long random sequence of data as is known in the prior art
  • Fig. 2 illustrates a time domain eye diagram when the phase error exceeds 40% according to an embodiment of the present invention
  • Fig. 3 illustrates a block diagram of a receiver according to an embodiment of the present invention
  • Fig. 4 illustrates a general block diagram of a decision subsystem according to an embodiment of the present invention
  • Fig. 5 illustrates a specific block diagram of a decision subsystem according to an embodiment of the present invention
  • Fig. 6 illustrates a flow chart diagram of a decision operation according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION Fig. 2 illustrates a time domain eye diagram when the phase error exceeds 40% according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Point 1 02 is where symbol error occurs when the data transition is from -1 to 1
  • Point 2 04 is where symbol error occurs when the data transition is from 1 to -1.
  • Points 1 02 and 204 both identify locations where the phase is off by approximately 40% of the symbol period, in this instance left of the center phase, T2.
  • Point 2 04 is the opposite polarity of the signal with the same phase as point 1 02.
  • Point 3 06 is the where the symbol error would occur when the data transition is from 1 to -1
  • Point 4 08 is where the symbol error would occur when the data transmission is from -1 to 1.
  • Points 3 06 and 4 08 both identify locations where the phase is off by approximately 40% of the symbol period to the right of the center phase, T2.
  • Point 408 is the opposite polarity of the signal with the same phase error as Point 3 06.
  • the sampled value has an amplitude value that is approximately equal to 0.5.
  • the sampled value when the phase error is small is close to either +1, 0, or -1. Therefore, a sampled value of 0.5 indicates a marginal condition and means phase error might occur.
  • the present invention utilizes this information as the first indicator that phase error has occurred.
  • the present invention also confirms that a data value transition has occurred.
  • the invention samples the values from the adjacent instances and evaluates these in order to verify that a data value transition is occurring within a symbol period. In Fig. 2, the spacing of the adjacent sampling phase is assumed to be one half of the symbol period as illustrated by samples SI 10 and S2 12.
  • SI 10 and S2 12 are related to Point 1 02, where the data transition is supposed to be from a -1 value to a +1 value. If SI 10 and S2 12 are close to opposite values, for instance in this case -1 or +1, then the data transition from a - 1 value to a +1 value is confirmed.
  • the present invention utilizes the fact that most of the erroneous decisions due to sampling phase errors occur when the decision phase (where the data decision is made) is swapped with one or the other of the two adjacent sampling phases (e.g., T2 is swapped with TI or T3). This occurrence is the second indicator that phase error has occurred.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a block diagram of a receiver 20 according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the receiver 20 accepts the incoming data stream and extracts the data and phase information from the incoming data stream.
  • the incoming data stream is input to a band-limiting low pass filter (LPF) 21, whose output is input to an amplifier 22 where it is amplified with automatic gain control (AGC).
  • AGC automatic gain control
  • the output of the amplifier 22 is sampled utilizing an analog-to-digital (A/D) converter 24.
  • A/D analog-to-digital
  • the digital signal is then input to an equalizer (EQL) 25.
  • the digital signal output from the equalizer 25 is input to a phase detector 26, where the phase information is extracted.
  • the sampled digital output signal from the equalizer 25 is also input into a decision system 30, where a value of the equalized sampled signal is determined.
  • the phase information generated by the phase detector 26 is filtered through a loop filter 27 and fed to the oscillator 28 to control the oscillator phase and frequency.
  • the clock signal generated by the oscillator 28 is used as the sampling clock of the input signal for the A/D converter 24.
  • Fig. 4 illustrates a decision system 30 according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the decision subsystem 30 includes an initial decision circuit 32, an error estimator module 34, an error verifier module 36, a transition detecting module 38, and an error correction module 40.
  • the sampled digital output from the equalizer 25 is input into the decision circuit 32, where the value of the sampled digital output is determined.
  • the decision circuit's output value is the value output by the decision subsystem 30 if the error correction module 40 is not activated to change the value.
  • the value of the data output from the decision circuit 32 is input to the error estimator module 34.
  • the error estimator module 34 subtracts the data value output from the decision circuit 32 from the data value input to the decision circuit 32.
  • the output of the error estimator module 34 is then amplified to either 1 or -1 to represent the corrected error value, which will be used if an error has occurred and the error correction module 40 is activated. For example, if the error estimator module output is .3, then the output is amplified to 1. If the error estimator output is -.2, then the output is amplified to -1.
  • the error estimator output is input to the error verifier module 36, which decides if the value of the signal is within a specified range.
  • the error verifier module output is input to the error correction module 40.
  • the error verifier module output is illustratively, a high signal if the value is found to be within the specified range.
  • the sampled digital output from the equalizer 25 is also input to the transition detecting module 38.
  • Adjacent samples of the digital output are used by the transition detecting module 38.
  • adjacent phase samples are samples one-half a symbol period before and after the decision instance sample, as illustrated by points SI 10 and S2 12 in Fig. 2.
  • the transition detecting module 38 determines if a full data transition (from a -1 value to a +1 value or from a +1 value to a -1 value) has occurred by evaluating if the adjacent phase samples are close to opposite normal values like -1 and 1.
  • the output of the transition detecting module 38 is also input into the error correction 40.
  • the output of the transition detecting module 38 is illustratively, high if the transition detecting module 38 determines a data value transition has occurred within the symbol period
  • the error corrector 40 sends the command to select the corrected value, rather than the tentative value.
  • the sampled digital output of the equalizer 25 is input to the decision circuit 32 which determines its value.
  • the decision circuit 32 determines if the output value is -1, 0 or +1.
  • the output of the decision circuit 32 is held as the tentative value of the data, which value is used if the error correction module 40 is not activated.
  • the sampled digital output of the equalizer 25 is input along with the decision circuit's output value to the error estimator module 34.
  • the error estimator module 34 calculates the error signal by subtracting the sampled digital output value from the equalizer 25 from the decision circuit's output value.
  • the error estimator module output value is sent through a Signed Boolean (SGN) circuit 50, which amplifies all negative values to -1 and amplifies all positive values to +1. For example, a - .2 value from the error estimator module 34 is amplified to -1 by the SGN circuit 50. This value is the corrected error value.
  • SGN Signed Boolean
  • the error estimator module's output is also input to the error verifier module 36 (see Fig. 4) to determine if the value is within a specific range that is known to be potentially erroneous. In a data steam that consists of data inputs -1, 0, +1, a value of 0.5, or -0.5, does not indicate whether the values is -1, 0 or 1, and therefore those values (+0.5 and -0.5) are considered marginal.
  • the error verifier module 36 consists of an absolute value (ABS) circuit 51 and a comparator 53.
  • ABS absolute value
  • the value of the error estimator module's output is input to the ABS circuit 51, which makes the value of the error estimator module output a positive value under all circumstances.
  • the output of the ABS circuit 51 is input to the comparator 53, where it is compared to a reference value, which in this example is 0.4.
  • the output of the ABS circuit 51 is compared to a 0.4 value, in this example, because the comparator 53 is looking for a value from the error estimator 34 approximately equal to 0.5. If the output of the ABS circuit 51 is greater than 0.4, then the output of the comparator 53 is illustratively, high.
  • the output of the comparator 53 is labeled as SIGNAL_A. If SIGNAL_A is high, then the value has been determined to be in the range of marginality. SIGNAL_A is input into the error correction module 40.
  • the transition detecting module 38 confirms if a data value transition has occurred.
  • the transition detecting module 38 includes an adder circuit 60, an absolute value (ABS) circuit 61, and a comparator 63. Two samples are taken of the input signal from the equalizer 25, with the first, e.g., SI 10, one-half a symbol period before TI in Fig. 2 and the second, e.g., S2 12, one-half a symbol period after TI.
  • the data value of samples SI 10 and S2 12 are input to the adder circuit 60, which subtracts the data value before TI from the value after TI .
  • the output of the adder circuit 60 is input to the ABS circuit 61, which makes the resulting value a positive value under all circumstances.
  • the output of the ABS circuit 61 is input to the comparator 63 and compared to a reference value, which in this example is 1.5.
  • the comparator 63 uses a value of 1.5 because this would indicate that the data values of samples SI 10 and S2 12 are close to normal values like -1 or +1.
  • the comparator 63 generates an output, which is labeled as SIGNAL B.
  • SIGNAL_B is high if the output from the ABS circuit 61 is greater than 1.5 and will be low if the output is less than 1.5. If the two adjacent phase samples are close to normal values such as + 1 or -1, then the data transition within a symbol period is confirmed, and SIGNAL B is output high. SIGNAL B is input to the error correction module 40.
  • SIGNAL A and SIGNAL_B are both illustratively, high, then the correction module 40 issues a command to select the corrected value, which was output from the error estimator module 34 (see Fig. 4). Therefore, the data input from error correction module 40 overrides the tentative value, which was supplied initially by the decision circuit 32.
  • Fig. 6 illustrates a flow chart diagram of a decision operation according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • a decision circuit 32 calculates 70 a value of an input signal and holds that value as a tentative value.
  • An error estimator module 34 calculates 72 an error value, amplifies the error value and holds the amplified error value as a corrected value.
  • An error verifier module 36 determines 74 whether the amplified error value is within a marginal range.
  • a transition detecting module 38 determines 76 whether the input signal was in transition from a positive to negative state, or a negative to positive state during a symbol period.
  • An error correction module 40 overrides 78 the tentative value with the corrected value if the amplified error value is within the marginal range and if the input signal was in transition.
  • the invention is particularly important when the transceiver is implemented in sampled signal processing using the combination of an analog-to-digital converter and a digital signal processor (DSP).
  • DSP digital signal processor
  • the DSP approach is essential to enhancing the existing long haul analog TI transceiver implementation to a quad or octel structure to avoid channel-to-channel cross talk in the silicon.
  • the present invention provides a method and system for error correction in a highspeed data transmission system where jitter, or phase error, can cause inter-symbol interference.
  • a receiver includes a decision system. The decision system determines a tentative value of a sampled input signal. The decision system calculates an error value, amplifies the error value and holds it as a corrected error value. The decision system determines if the error value is within a marginal range and then determines if the sampled input signal is in a transition within a symbol period. If both of these conditions are met, then the decision system overrides the tentative value and substitutes the corrected value. While the description above refers to particular embodiments of the present invention, it will be understood that many modifications may be made without departing from the spirit thereof.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Dc Digital Transmission (AREA)
  • Detection And Prevention Of Errors In Transmission (AREA)

Abstract

A receiver includes a decision system. Which calculates a value of an input signal and holds the value as a tentative value. The decision system calculates an error value, amplifies the error value, and holds the amplified error value as a corrected value. If the amplified error value is within a marginal range and the input signal was in transition from a positive to negative state, or a negative to positive state, then the decision system overrides the tentative value with the corrected value.

Description

TITLE OF THE INVENTION
ERROR CORRECTION METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DATA TRANSMISSION
SYSTEM
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention The present invention generally relates to high-speed data transmission. More specifically, the present invention relates to correcting the jitter spectrum in a transmission system that requires stringent jitter tolerance over a wide range of jitter frequencies, such as the incoming signal of a 1.544 Megabit-per-second (Mbit) point-to-point dedicated, digital circuit (TI) system, which may have very large jitter due to the cascade of several TI links in the network.
2. Discussion of the Related Art
Networking applications have become very popular in recent years, particularly in response to an explosion in the use and variety of networks employed in a vast array of computing environments. Accordingly, many advances have been made in the related technology in order to improve the quality of these networking systems. For example, fully integrated transceivers for TI network channel service units (CSUs) and integrated services digital network (ISDN) primary rate interface applications are known in the art and are presently commercially available. These devices, such as the Intel LXT360 Tl/El transceiver, are useful for networking applications, such as timing recovery in TI network systems. However, there are obstacles that prevent such systems from providing better jitter tolerance - a desirable quality in communications networks and other networking applications. Such obstacles may include exceptionally large amplitude jitter, a wide variation in data density, large amounts of cable attenuation, and imperfect equalization. Jitter is the general term used to describe the noise or uncertainty in the period of incoming data in a communications system. In an ideal system, bits arrive at time increments that are integer multiples of a bit repetition time. However, in a real-world system, data pulses arrive at times that deviate from these integer multiples. This deviation may cause errors in the transmission of data, particularly when the data is transmitted at high speeds. The deviation or variation may be in the amplitude, frequency, or phase of the data. Jitter may occur due to a number of causes, including inter-symbol interference, frequency differences between the transmitter and receiver clock, noise, and the non-ideal behavior of the receiver and transmitter clock generation circuits. Jitter is a problem of particular import in digital communications systems. First, jitter causes the received signal to be sampled at a non-optimal sampling point. This occurrence reduces the signal-to-noise ratio at the receiver and thus limits the information rate. Second, in conventional systems, each receiver typically extracts its receive sampling clock from the incoming data signal. Jitter makes this task significantly more difficult. Third, in long-distance transmission systems, where multiple repeaters reside in a chain, jitter accumulates. That is, each receiver extracts a clock from the incoming bit stream, re-times the data, and re-transmits the data utilizing the recovered clock. Each subsequent receiver thus sees a progressively larger degree of input jitter.
When an incoming signal contains a large and high frequency jitter component, the receiver phase lock loop (RPLL) tends to lose its ability to accurately catch up to the incoming signal phase movement. When this RPLL misadjustment becomes larger than a certain amount of the symbol period, it causes symbol error. The phase misadjustment can be understood as the phase error of the recovered clock phase from that of the incoming signal. The timing margin is defined as the largest phase error that occurs without causing symbol error. Figure 1 illustrates this scenario in terms of the data decision instance margin. Figure 1 is a superposition of possible signal traces for two symbol periods out of a long random sequence of data and is referred to as an eye diagram. The timing margin shown in Figure 1 is from time TI to T3, where T2 is the optimal decision instance. If the phase error causes the data decision to be made either before TI or after T3, then the data decision might be erroneous. In that case, the receiver starts making errors due to inter- symbol interference. Generally, this occurs when the phase error exceeds 40% of the symbol period, which is to the left of time TI and to the right of T3 in Figure 1.
Accordingly, there is a need for an error correction method and apparatus that allows correction of symbol error even when phase error exceeds more than 40% of the symbol period. There is also a need for an error correction method and apparatus, to reduce error rates due to pattern jitter, having a simple implementation.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Fig. 1 illustrates a time domain eye diagram with signal traces for two symbol periods out of a long random sequence of data as is known in the prior art;
Fig. 2 illustrates a time domain eye diagram when the phase error exceeds 40% according to an embodiment of the present invention; Fig. 3 illustrates a block diagram of a receiver according to an embodiment of the present invention;
Fig. 4 illustrates a general block diagram of a decision subsystem according to an embodiment of the present invention;
Fig. 5 illustrates a specific block diagram of a decision subsystem according to an embodiment of the present invention; and Fig. 6 illustrates a flow chart diagram of a decision operation according to an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION Fig. 2 illustrates a time domain eye diagram when the phase error exceeds 40% according to an embodiment of the present invention. Point 1 02 is where symbol error occurs when the data transition is from -1 to 1, and Point 2 04 is where symbol error occurs when the data transition is from 1 to -1. Points 1 02 and 204 both identify locations where the phase is off by approximately 40% of the symbol period, in this instance left of the center phase, T2. For example, the error event occurs when the data decision instance, which should be at T2 (t=1.0) and thus coded as a +1 value, is instead decided at TI (t=0.6), where the amplitude is less than 0.5 and thus coded as a 0 value. Point 2 04 is the opposite polarity of the signal with the same phase as point 1 02.
An additional example of the error events that the present invention overcomes is identified in Fig. 2. Point 3 06 is the where the symbol error would occur when the data transition is from 1 to -1, and Point 4 08 is where the symbol error would occur when the data transmission is from -1 to 1. Points 3 06 and 4 08 both identify locations where the phase is off by approximately 40% of the symbol period to the right of the center phase, T2. The error event occurs when the data decision instance, which should be at T2 (t=0) and coded as a +1 value, is instead sampled at T3 (t=l .4) and therefore coded as a 0 value. Point 408 is the opposite polarity of the signal with the same phase error as Point 3 06.
In all four cases above and in most erroneous cases, the sampled value has an amplitude value that is approximately equal to 0.5. Generally, the sampled value when the phase error is small is close to either +1, 0, or -1. Therefore, a sampled value of 0.5 indicates a marginal condition and means phase error might occur. The present invention utilizes this information as the first indicator that phase error has occurred. The present invention also confirms that a data value transition has occurred. The invention samples the values from the adjacent instances and evaluates these in order to verify that a data value transition is occurring within a symbol period. In Fig. 2, the spacing of the adjacent sampling phase is assumed to be one half of the symbol period as illustrated by samples SI 10 and S2 12. SI 10 and S2 12 are related to Point 1 02, where the data transition is supposed to be from a -1 value to a +1 value. If SI 10 and S2 12 are close to opposite values, for instance in this case -1 or +1, then the data transition from a - 1 value to a +1 value is confirmed. Generally, the present invention utilizes the fact that most of the erroneous decisions due to sampling phase errors occur when the decision phase (where the data decision is made) is swapped with one or the other of the two adjacent sampling phases (e.g., T2 is swapped with TI or T3). This occurrence is the second indicator that phase error has occurred. Thus, when both conditions are satisfied, meaning the data value is found to be marginal and a transition is occurring within the symbol period, then the data value is corrected. Fig. 3 illustrates a block diagram of a receiver 20 according to an embodiment of the present invention. The receiver 20 accepts the incoming data stream and extracts the data and phase information from the incoming data stream. The incoming data stream is input to a band-limiting low pass filter (LPF) 21, whose output is input to an amplifier 22 where it is amplified with automatic gain control (AGC). The output of the amplifier 22 is sampled utilizing an analog-to-digital (A/D) converter 24.
The digital signal is then input to an equalizer (EQL) 25. The digital signal output from the equalizer 25 is input to a phase detector 26, where the phase information is extracted. The sampled digital output signal from the equalizer 25 is also input into a decision system 30, where a value of the equalized sampled signal is determined. The phase information generated by the phase detector 26 is filtered through a loop filter 27 and fed to the oscillator 28 to control the oscillator phase and frequency. The clock signal generated by the oscillator 28 is used as the sampling clock of the input signal for the A/D converter 24.
Fig. 4 illustrates a decision system 30 according to an embodiment of the present invention. The decision subsystem 30 includes an initial decision circuit 32, an error estimator module 34, an error verifier module 36, a transition detecting module 38, and an error correction module 40. The sampled digital output from the equalizer 25 is input into the decision circuit 32, where the value of the sampled digital output is determined. The decision circuit's output value is the value output by the decision subsystem 30 if the error correction module 40 is not activated to change the value.
The value of the data output from the decision circuit 32 is input to the error estimator module 34. The error estimator module 34 subtracts the data value output from the decision circuit 32 from the data value input to the decision circuit 32. The output of the error estimator module 34 is then amplified to either 1 or -1 to represent the corrected error value, which will be used if an error has occurred and the error correction module 40 is activated. For example, if the error estimator module output is .3, then the output is amplified to 1. If the error estimator output is -.2, then the output is amplified to -1.
The error estimator output is input to the error verifier module 36, which decides if the value of the signal is within a specified range. The error verifier module output is input to the error correction module 40. The error verifier module output is illustratively, a high signal if the value is found to be within the specified range.
The sampled digital output from the equalizer 25 is also input to the transition detecting module 38. Adjacent samples of the digital output are used by the transition detecting module 38. For example, adjacent phase samples are samples one-half a symbol period before and after the decision instance sample, as illustrated by points SI 10 and S2 12 in Fig. 2. The transition detecting module 38 determines if a full data transition (from a -1 value to a +1 value or from a +1 value to a -1 value) has occurred by evaluating if the adjacent phase samples are close to opposite normal values like -1 and 1. The output of the transition detecting module 38 is also input into the error correction 40. The output of the transition detecting module 38 is illustratively, high if the transition detecting module 38 determines a data value transition has occurred within the symbol period
If the outputs of the transition detecting module 38 and the error verifier module 36 are, for example, both high, then the error corrector 40 sends the command to select the corrected value, rather than the tentative value.
In one embodiment of the invention as illustrated in Fig. 5, the sampled digital output of the equalizer 25 is input to the decision circuit 32 which determines its value. In this embodiment, the decision circuit 32 determines if the output value is -1, 0 or +1. The output of the decision circuit 32 is held as the tentative value of the data, which value is used if the error correction module 40 is not activated.
The sampled digital output of the equalizer 25 is input along with the decision circuit's output value to the error estimator module 34. The error estimator module 34 calculates the error signal by subtracting the sampled digital output value from the equalizer 25 from the decision circuit's output value. The error estimator module output value is sent through a Signed Boolean (SGN) circuit 50, which amplifies all negative values to -1 and amplifies all positive values to +1. For example, a - .2 value from the error estimator module 34 is amplified to -1 by the SGN circuit 50. This value is the corrected error value.
The error estimator module's output is also input to the error verifier module 36 (see Fig. 4) to determine if the value is within a specific range that is known to be potentially erroneous. In a data steam that consists of data inputs -1, 0, +1, a value of 0.5, or -0.5, does not indicate whether the values is -1, 0 or 1, and therefore those values (+0.5 and -0.5) are considered marginal. In one embodiment of the invention, the error verifier module 36 consists of an absolute value (ABS) circuit 51 and a comparator 53. The value of the error estimator module's output is input to the ABS circuit 51, which makes the value of the error estimator module output a positive value under all circumstances. The output of the ABS circuit 51 is input to the comparator 53, where it is compared to a reference value, which in this example is 0.4. The output of the ABS circuit 51 is compared to a 0.4 value, in this example, because the comparator 53 is looking for a value from the error estimator 34 approximately equal to 0.5. If the output of the ABS circuit 51 is greater than 0.4, then the output of the comparator 53 is illustratively, high. The output of the comparator 53 is labeled as SIGNAL_A. If SIGNAL_A is high, then the value has been determined to be in the range of marginality. SIGNAL_A is input into the error correction module 40. The transition detecting module 38 confirms if a data value transition has occurred.
In one embodiment of the invention, the transition detecting module 38 includes an adder circuit 60, an absolute value (ABS) circuit 61, and a comparator 63. Two samples are taken of the input signal from the equalizer 25, with the first, e.g., SI 10, one-half a symbol period before TI in Fig. 2 and the second, e.g., S2 12, one-half a symbol period after TI.
The data value of samples SI 10 and S2 12 are input to the adder circuit 60, which subtracts the data value before TI from the value after TI . The output of the adder circuit 60 is input to the ABS circuit 61, which makes the resulting value a positive value under all circumstances. The output of the ABS circuit 61 is input to the comparator 63 and compared to a reference value, which in this example is 1.5. The comparator 63 uses a value of 1.5 because this would indicate that the data values of samples SI 10 and S2 12 are close to normal values like -1 or +1. The comparator 63 generates an output, which is labeled as SIGNAL B. SIGNAL_B is high if the output from the ABS circuit 61 is greater than 1.5 and will be low if the output is less than 1.5. If the two adjacent phase samples are close to normal values such as + 1 or -1, then the data transition within a symbol period is confirmed, and SIGNAL B is output high. SIGNAL B is input to the error correction module 40.
If SIGNAL A and SIGNAL_B are both illustratively, high, then the correction module 40 issues a command to select the corrected value, which was output from the error estimator module 34 (see Fig. 4). Therefore, the data input from error correction module 40 overrides the tentative value, which was supplied initially by the decision circuit 32.
Fig. 6 illustrates a flow chart diagram of a decision operation according to an embodiment of the present invention. A decision circuit 32 calculates 70 a value of an input signal and holds that value as a tentative value. An error estimator module 34 calculates 72 an error value, amplifies the error value and holds the amplified error value as a corrected value. An error verifier module 36 determines 74 whether the amplified error value is within a marginal range. A transition detecting module 38 determines 76 whether the input signal was in transition from a positive to negative state, or a negative to positive state during a symbol period. An error correction module 40 overrides 78 the tentative value with the corrected value if the amplified error value is within the marginal range and if the input signal was in transition.
The invention is particularly important when the transceiver is implemented in sampled signal processing using the combination of an analog-to-digital converter and a digital signal processor (DSP). The DSP approach is essential to enhancing the existing long haul analog TI transceiver implementation to a quad or octel structure to avoid channel-to-channel cross talk in the silicon.
The present invention provides a method and system for error correction in a highspeed data transmission system where jitter, or phase error, can cause inter-symbol interference. A receiver includes a decision system. The decision system determines a tentative value of a sampled input signal. The decision system calculates an error value, amplifies the error value and holds it as a corrected error value. The decision system determines if the error value is within a marginal range and then determines if the sampled input signal is in a transition within a symbol period. If both of these conditions are met, then the decision system overrides the tentative value and substitutes the corrected value. While the description above refers to particular embodiments of the present invention, it will be understood that many modifications may be made without departing from the spirit thereof. The accompanying claims are intended to cover such modifications as would fall within the true scope and spirit of the present invention. The presently disclosed embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being indicated by the appended claims, rather than the foregoing description, and all changes that come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are intended to be embraced therein.

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A method of error correction in a high-speed data transmission system, comprising: determining a value of an input signal at a decision timeframe and holding the value as a tentative value; estimating an error of the value, amplifying the error of the value, and holding the amplified error of the value as a corrected value; deciding if the amplified error of the value is within a defined marginal range; determining if the input signal is involved in a transition from a positive to negative state or from a negative to positive state during a symbol period; and correcting the tentative value to the corrected value if both the error of the value is in the defined marginal range and the input signal is involved in the transition.
2. A method of error correction in a high-speed data transmission system according to claim 1, wherein two adjacent values of the input signal are calculated before and after the decision timeframe to determine if the input signal is involved in a transition.
3. A method of error correction in a high-speed data transmission system according to claim 2, wherein the two adjacent values are calculated one-half a symbol period before and after the decision timeframe.
4. A method of error correction in a high-speed data transmission system according to claim 3, wherein the two adjacent values are involved in a transition from less than -
0.75, to greater than + 0.75 or from greater than + 0.75 to less than -0.75.
5. A method of error correction in a high-speed data transmission system according to claim 3, wherein the two adjacent values are involved in a transition from - 1 to + 1, or from +1 to -1.
6. A decision system in high-speed data transmission, comprising: a data decision circuit to determine a value of an input signal at a decision instance and to hold the value as a tentative value; an error estimator module to determine an error value of the value, to amplify the error value, and to hold the amplified error value as a corrected value; an error verifier module to determine whether the amplified error value is within a marginal range; a transition detecting module, to determine whether the input signal was in transition from a positive to negative state, or a negative to positive state during a symbol period; and an error correction module to determine whether the tentative value should be overridden by the corrected value.
7. The decision system according to claim 6, wherein the error verifier module includes an absolute value circuit to make the error value a positive number and a comparator to compare the error value to a reference value.
8. The decision system according to claim 6, wherein adjacent sample values of the input signal before and after the decision instance are used to determine if the input signal is in transition.
9. The decision system according to claim 8, wherein the adjacent samples values are calculated one-half a symbol period before and after the decision instance.
10. The decision system according to claim 8, wherein the transition detecting module includes an adder to add the adjacent sample values, an absolute value circuit to make positive the added adjacent sample values, and a comparator to compare the added adjacent sample values to a reference value.
1 1. A receiver utilized in high speed data transmission to output data values, comprising: an analog-to-digital converter to receive an input signal and to output a sampled digital signal and a phase information; a decision system to receive the sampled digital signal and to output a value from the receiver, wherein the decision system: receives the sampled digital signal, calculates a value at a decision instance, and assigns a tentative value; calculates an error value, amplifies the error value and holds it as a corrected value; determines if the error value is within a marginal range; determines whether the input signal was in a transition from a positive to negative state, or a negative to positive state during a symbol period; and outputs the corrected value as the value if the error value is within the marginal range and if the input signal is in a transition during a symbol period; a phase detector to receive the value and the phase information and to output a detected phase information; a loop filter to receive the detected phase information and to output a filtered phase information; and an oscillator to receive the filtered phase information and to output a clock signal as a sampling clock for the analog-to-digital converter.
12. The receiver according to claim 11, wherein adjacent sample values of the input signal before and after the decision instance are used to determine if the sampled digital signal is within a transition.
13. The receiver according to claim 12, wherein the adjacent sample values are calculated one-half a symbol period before and after the decision instance.
14. The receiver according to claim 11, wherein the decision system includes: a data decision circuit to receive the sampled digital signal, to calculate a value at a decision instance, and to assign the tentative value; an error estimator module to calculate an error value, to amplify the error value and to hold it as the corrected value; an error verifier module to determine if the error value is within a marginal range; a transition detecting module to determine whether the sampled digital signal was in a transition from a positive to negative state, or a negative to positive state during a symbol period; and an error correction module to output the corrected value as the value if the error value is within the marginal range and if the sampled digital signal is involved in a transition.
15. The receiver according to claim 14, wherein the error verifier module includes an absolute value circuit to make the error value a positive number and a comparator to compare the error value to a reference value.
16. The receiver according to claim 14, wherein the transition detecting module includes an adder to add the adjacent sample values, an absolute value circuit to make positive the added adjacent sample values, and a comparator to compare the added adjacent sample values to a reference value.
17. The system receiver according to claim 11, wherein the input signal is received from a TI data transmission system.
18. The system receiver according to claim 17, wherein the TI data transmission system includes a plurality of cascaded TI links.
19. A decision circuit, comprising: a machine-readable storage medium; and machine-readable program code, stored on the machine readable storage medium, the machine-readable program code having instructions to calculate a value of an input signal at a decision instance and to hold the value as a tentative value, calculate an error value, amplify the error value, and hold the amplified error value as a corrected value, determine whether the error value is within a marginal range, determine the input signal was in transition from a positive to negative state, or from a negative to positive state during a symbol period, and decide whether the tentative value should be overridden by the corrected value.
20. The decision circuit according to claim 19, wherein adjacent sample values of the input signal before and after the decision instance are used to determine if the input signal is in transition.
21. The decision circuit according to claim 20, wherein the adjacent sample values of the input signal are calculated one-half a symbol period before and after the decision instance.
PCT/US2002/034961 2001-10-31 2002-10-30 Method and apparatus for error correction in a data transmission system WO2003039090A2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2002363157A AU2002363157A1 (en) 2001-10-31 2002-10-30 Method and apparatus for error correction in a data transmission system

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US171201A 2001-10-31 2001-10-31
US10/001,712 2001-10-31

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2003039090A2 true WO2003039090A2 (en) 2003-05-08
WO2003039090A3 WO2003039090A3 (en) 2003-07-10

Family

ID=21697445

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2002/034961 WO2003039090A2 (en) 2001-10-31 2002-10-30 Method and apparatus for error correction in a data transmission system

Country Status (3)

Country Link
CN (1) CN100525270C (en)
AU (1) AU2002363157A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2003039090A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102769587A (en) * 2012-07-09 2012-11-07 广东威创视讯科技股份有限公司 Method and devices for enhancing PCI-E (Peripheral Component Interconnect - Express) data transmission stability
CN105897629A (en) * 2016-06-15 2016-08-24 晶晨半导体(上海)有限公司 Signal decision device and signal decision method

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3760282A (en) * 1972-03-29 1973-09-18 Ibm Data recovery system
US4912726A (en) * 1987-01-12 1990-03-27 Fujitsu Limited Decision timing control circuit
EP0594246B1 (en) * 1992-10-22 1998-03-04 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Data processing circuit
US5436589A (en) * 1994-01-31 1995-07-25 Motorola, Inc. Demodulator for frequency shift keyed signals

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN100525270C (en) 2009-08-05
WO2003039090A3 (en) 2003-07-10
AU2002363157A1 (en) 2003-05-12
CN1611045A (en) 2005-04-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7006564B2 (en) Adaptive equalizer
US9455848B1 (en) DFE-skewed CDR circuit
US7167516B1 (en) Circuit and method for finding the sampling phase and canceling precursor intersymbol interference in a decision feedback equalized receiver
US8953665B2 (en) Pattern-based loss of signal detector
US5761243A (en) Digital receiver with noise filter which also serves as a feedback filter providing intersymbol interference reduction
US11070351B1 (en) Controller and method for data communication
US8902963B2 (en) Methods and apparatus for determining threshold of one or more DFE transition latches based on incoming data eye
EP1701496A1 (en) Burst error limiting feedback equalizer system and method for multidimensional modulation systems
US7606301B2 (en) Method and apparatus for adaptively establishing a sampling phase for decision-feedback equalization
US4484338A (en) Data transmission systems
WO2019205670A1 (en) Phase detection method, phase detection circuit, and clock recovery device
WO2002032067A1 (en) Method for automatic frequency control
US6640194B2 (en) Timing jitter frequency detector for timing recovery systems
US7035365B2 (en) Error correction method and apparatus for data transmission system
US7649933B2 (en) Method and apparatus for determining a position of an offset latch employed for decision-feedback equalization
US20100128828A1 (en) Methods and apparatus for adapting one or more equalization parameters by reducing group delay spread
EP0577212B1 (en) Adaptive viterbi detector
US7190740B2 (en) Arrangement for dynamic DC offset compensation
US5987065A (en) Adaptive equalizer
US10505705B1 (en) Receiver with cancellation of intrinsic offset from decision feedback equalization to enhance data margin
WO2003039090A2 (en) Method and apparatus for error correction in a data transmission system
US7154979B2 (en) Timing recovery with variable bandwidth phase locked loop and non-linear control paths
US9083498B2 (en) Method and device for processing data and communication system comprising such device
US20030081699A1 (en) Phase detector
WO2003039063A2 (en) Timing recovery with varaible bandwidth phase locked loop and non-linear control paths

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ OM PH PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG UZ VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 20028265270

Country of ref document: CN

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Country of ref document: JP