You can subscribe to this list here.
2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
|
Aug
(7) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(7) |
2006 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(17) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(1) |
2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(8) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(1) |
2008 |
Jan
(17) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(19) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(35) |
2009 |
Jan
(40) |
Feb
(16) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(6) |
May
|
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(15) |
Dec
(15) |
2010 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(12) |
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
|
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
2011 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
|
Apr
(12) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
|
2012 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(10) |
May
|
Jun
(14) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2013 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(37) |
Aug
(20) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(34) |
Dec
|
2014 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(24) |
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(28) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(2) |
2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(13) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(11) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
|
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
(6) |
Mar
|
Apr
(9) |
May
(23) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(7) |
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(8) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(3) |
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2019 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(6) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(31) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(7) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2021 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2022 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
(1) |
20
|
21
(1) |
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
(2) |
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From: Stephen S. <rad...@gm...> - 2008-11-25 20:01:17
|
Hi, I've was just thinking about when to do that actually. I'll have a look over the bug list and see if there's any other small items that could be tackled before doing 0.26. Anyways, feel free to use 0.24 or the svn version until that time if you want. Steve On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Fabien Pélisson <fab...@gm...> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using fluxus which requires the liblo. The proposed version on > sourceforge (actually 0.25) does not provide the declaration of lo_arg_size > in lo_lowlevel.h required by fluxus. Looking at the svn repository (rev > 140), this function was moved back in lo_lowlevel.h . > Could you tell me if you have plan to make a new release ? > > Thank you, > > Best regards, > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great > prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > liblo-devel mailing list > lib...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/liblo-devel > > |
From: F. P. <fab...@gm...> - 2008-11-25 17:35:56
|
Hi, I'm using fluxus which requires the liblo. The proposed version on sourceforge (actually 0.25) does not provide the declaration of lo_arg_size in lo_lowlevel.h required by fluxus. Looking at the svn repository (rev 140), this function was moved back in lo_lowlevel.h . Could you tell me if you have plan to make a new release ? Thank you, Best regards, |
From: Stephen S. <rad...@gm...> - 2008-11-21 23:54:53
|
Committed, thanks! I didn't even know this. ;-) I've always just returned 0. Steve 2008/11/19 Steve Harris <S.W...@ec...>: > Hi all, > > I've attached a patch that makes it explicit what the return value from > method handlers does. > Could probably be better, but before it wasn't stated anywhere that I could > see. > > Cheers, > Steve > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great > prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > liblo-devel mailing list > lib...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/liblo-devel > > |
From: Steve H. <S.W...@ec...> - 2008-11-19 11:40:19
|
Hi all, I've attached a patch that makes it explicit what the return value from method handlers does. Could probably be better, but before it wasn't stated anywhere that I could see. Cheers, Steve |