You can subscribe to this list here.
2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
|
Aug
(7) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(7) |
2006 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(17) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(1) |
2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(8) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(1) |
2008 |
Jan
(17) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(19) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(35) |
2009 |
Jan
(40) |
Feb
(16) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(6) |
May
|
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(15) |
Dec
(15) |
2010 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(12) |
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
|
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
2011 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
|
Apr
(12) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
|
2012 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(10) |
May
|
Jun
(14) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2013 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(37) |
Aug
(20) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(34) |
Dec
|
2014 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(24) |
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(28) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(2) |
2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(13) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(11) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
|
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
(6) |
Mar
|
Apr
(9) |
May
(23) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(7) |
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(8) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(3) |
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2019 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(6) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(31) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(7) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2021 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2022 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
(4) |
15
(2) |
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
(4) |
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
From: Stephen S. <rad...@gm...> - 2013-01-21 23:57:54
|
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Jeremia Bär <je...@je...> wrote: > Hi, > > I looked at liblo for the first time today. I had some problems getting > the example codes to run until I realized this is because of a subtle > difference of C and C++. In 'example_server.c', line 82 > > lo_arg_pp(types[i], argv[i]); > > (where types is of 'const char*') compiles nicely as C code using gcc. > Using the same code from C++ however, compiling with g++, yields the > following compiling error: > > examples/example_server.c: In function ‘int generic_handler(const char*, > const char*, lo_arg**, int, void*, void*)’: > examples/example_server.c:82:36: error: invalid conversion from ‘char’ > to ‘lo_type’ > examples/example_server.c:82:36: error: initializing argument 1 of ‘void > lo_arg_pp(lo_type, void*)’ > > Researching I found this: In C, an enum (e.g. lo_type) is always of type > int. Thus, an implicit type-cast is performed. In C++, enum is a > distinct type and implicit conversion is not allowed. Making the cast > explicit makes the code work in both C and C++, like so: > > lo_arg_pp((lo_type) types[i], argv[i]); > > Now I see that this is an example C code and maybe even a C++ programmer > should be aware of that difference. But it's quite nasty so I'd suggest > changing the example code to the above line or add a comment for naive > C++ programmers like I am ;-) Hi, Great suggestion. I had to think about whether it was worth changing, but I think you're right, it's a tiny change and could resolve some confusion for newcomers. Committed! > I very much like liblo. It's very straightforward. Glad to hear it! I can tell you that there are in fact some shiny new C++ bindings coming down the line ;) Steve |
From: Jeremia B. <je...@je...> - 2013-01-21 22:57:43
|
Hi, I looked at liblo for the first time today. I had some problems getting the example codes to run until I realized this is because of a subtle difference of C and C++. In 'example_server.c', line 82 lo_arg_pp(types[i], argv[i]); (where types is of 'const char*') compiles nicely as C code using gcc. Using the same code from C++ however, compiling with g++, yields the following compiling error: examples/example_server.c: In function ‘int generic_handler(const char*, const char*, lo_arg**, int, void*, void*)’: examples/example_server.c:82:36: error: invalid conversion from ‘char’ to ‘lo_type’ examples/example_server.c:82:36: error: initializing argument 1 of ‘void lo_arg_pp(lo_type, void*)’ Researching I found this: In C, an enum (e.g. lo_type) is always of type int. Thus, an implicit type-cast is performed. In C++, enum is a distinct type and implicit conversion is not allowed. Making the cast explicit makes the code work in both C and C++, like so: lo_arg_pp((lo_type) types[i], argv[i]); Now I see that this is an example C code and maybe even a C++ programmer should be aware of that difference. But it's quite nasty so I'd suggest changing the example code to the above line or add a comment for naive C++ programmers like I am ;-) I very much like liblo. It's very straightforward. Regrads, Jeremia |
From: Camille T. <ca...@os...> - 2013-01-21 16:12:14
|
Awesome, thanks Steve !!! On 21 janv. 2013, at 16:43, Stephen Sinclair <rad...@gm...> wrote: > Hi, > > A long-awaited patch for handling buffers for open TCP streams has > been pushed! Previously, the TCP stream did not succeed if a whole > message was not read in one shot, and the fix for this broke > non-blocking behaviour. The correct fix is to save incomplete > messages from the stream in a buffer and append to it the next time > recv() is called. > > This is one of the last important things I wanted to take care of > before 0.27, so please test. > > I noticed that my hostname branch causes testlo to fail on Mac, so > I'll be looking at that next. > > Steve > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, > MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current > with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft > MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412 > _______________________________________________ > liblo-devel mailing list > lib...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/liblo-devel |
From: Stephen S. <rad...@gm...> - 2013-01-21 15:43:11
|
Hi, A long-awaited patch for handling buffers for open TCP streams has been pushed! Previously, the TCP stream did not succeed if a whole message was not read in one shot, and the fix for this broke non-blocking behaviour. The correct fix is to save incomplete messages from the stream in a buffer and append to it the next time recv() is called. This is one of the last important things I wanted to take care of before 0.27, so please test. I noticed that my hostname branch causes testlo to fail on Mac, so I'll be looking at that next. Steve |
From: Stephen S. <rad...@gm...> - 2013-01-15 14:36:44
|
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Sigurd Saue <sig...@nt...> wrote: > Yes. Building with ".\autogen.sh --disable-debug" built without errors. Glad to hear it. I've got a patch that fixes the warnings on MingW, but there were a few problems with unsupported printf formatting of 64-bit numbers (e.g. "%lld") that I don't want to simply remove, so I've got to think about how to correctly handle that. Steve |
From: Sigurd S. <sig...@nt...> - 2013-01-15 08:27:43
|
Yes. Building with ".\autogen.sh --disable-debug" built without errors. Thanks! Sigurd -----Original Message----- From: Stephen Sinclair [mailto:rad...@gm...] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 5:52 PM To: liblo development list Subject: Re: [liblo] Changes in November cause MinGW problems On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Sigurd Saue <sig...@nt...> wrote: > > Thank you for quick response. I’ve updated to latest again, but now get the following error: > > address.c:401:20: error: passing argument 4 of 'setsockopt' from > incompatible pointer type [-Werror] > > address.c:569:13: error: passing argument 1 of 'lstrcmpW' from > incompatible pointer type [-Werror] These errors are generated by -Werror. They should be fixed, but they should only show up if you are configured for debug mode. Are you able to compile if you don't enable debug mode? Steve ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412 _______________________________________________ liblo-devel mailing list lib...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/liblo-devel |
From: Stephen S. <rad...@gm...> - 2013-01-14 16:51:46
|
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Sigurd Saue <sig...@nt...> wrote: > > Thank you for quick response. I’ve updated to latest again, but now get the following error: > > address.c:401:20: error: passing argument 4 of 'setsockopt' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror] > > address.c:569:13: error: passing argument 1 of 'lstrcmpW' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror] These errors are generated by -Werror. They should be fixed, but they should only show up if you are configured for debug mode. Are you able to compile if you don't enable debug mode? Steve |
From: Sigurd S. <sig...@nt...> - 2013-01-14 15:00:42
|
Thank you for quick response. I’ve updated to latest again, but now get the following error: make[3]: Entering directory `/d/Develop/liblo/src' /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -Wall -I.. -DWIN32 -D_WIN32_WINNT=0x501 -O0 -g -Wall -Werror -MT liblo_la-address.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/liblo_la-address.Tpo -c -o liblo_la-address.lo `test -f 'address.c' || echo './'`address.c libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -Wall -I.. -DWIN32 -D_WIN32_WINNT=0x501 -O0 -g -Wall -Werror -MT liblo_la-address.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/liblo_la-address.Tpo -c address.c -DDLL_EXPORT -DPIC -o .libs/liblo_la-address.o address.c: In function 'lo_address_set_flags': address.c:401:20: error: passing argument 4 of 'setsockopt' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror] d:\develop\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.6.2/../../../../include/winsock2.h:551:32: note: expected 'const char *' but argument is of type 'int *' address.c: In function 'lo_inaddr_find_iface': address.c:569:13: error: passing argument 1 of 'lstrcmpW' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror] d:\develop\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.6.2/../../../../include/winbase.h:1929:23: note: expected 'LPCWSTR' but argument is of type 'const char *' cc1.exe: all warnings being treated as errors make[3]: *** [liblo_la-address.lo] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/d/Develop/liblo/src' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/d/Develop/liblo/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/d/Develop/liblo' make: *** [all] Error 2 From: Stephen Sinclair [mailto:rad...@gm...] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 3:39 PM To: liblo development list Subject: Re: [liblo] Changes in November cause MinGW problems On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Sigurd Saue <sig...@nt...<mailto:sig...@nt...>> wrote: Hi, I tried to build liblo from the latest GIT, but it failed due to "netinet/tcp.h" not found (in address.c). I build on Windows 7 using MinGW, and the sys/netinet files are not present there. This dependency was introduced into liblo 2012-09-03. When I reverted to an earlier commit, liblo built fine. Is there a way to remove this dependency on Windows again (e.g. by checking WIN32)? Hello, Yes, I just pushed a patch to fix this as well as add a couple of missing functions to the .def file. I compiled with MingW without errors, let me know how it goes. Steve |
From: Stephen S. <rad...@gm...> - 2013-01-14 14:38:59
|
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Sigurd Saue <sig...@nt...> wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to build liblo from the latest GIT, but it failed due to > "netinet/tcp.h" not found (in address.c). I build on Windows 7 using MinGW, > and the sys/netinet files are not present there. This dependency was > introduced into liblo 2012-09-03. When I reverted to an earlier commit, > liblo built fine. > > Is there a way to remove this dependency on Windows again (e.g. by > checking WIN32)? > > Hello, Yes, I just pushed a patch to fix this as well as add a couple of missing functions to the .def file. I compiled with MingW without errors, let me know how it goes. Steve |
From: Sigurd S. <sig...@nt...> - 2013-01-14 14:23:27
|
Hi, I tried to build liblo from the latest GIT, but it failed due to "netinet/tcp.h" not found (in address.c). I build on Windows 7 using MinGW, and the sys/netinet files are not present there. This dependency was introduced into liblo 2012-09-03. When I reverted to an earlier commit, liblo built fine. Is there a way to remove this dependency on Windows again (e.g. by checking WIN32)? Sigurd |